Latent class models for conjoint analysis

Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 295-319

  Ramaswamy, Venkatram ^a   Cohen, Steven H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Stratford Marketing Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956550710     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71404-0_15     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Aaker, D. (1998). Strategic Marketing Management. New York.
2. Addelman, S. (1962). Orthogonal Main-effect Plans for Asymmetrical Factorial Experi-ments. Technometrics, 4. 21-46.
3. Akaike, H. (1974), A New Look at Statistical Model Identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 716-723.
4. Allenby, G. M., Aurora, N. and Ginter, J. L. (1995), Incorporating Prior Knowledge in Conjoint Analysis Studies, Journal of Marketing Research 32, 152-162.
5. Allenby, G. M., Aurora, N. and Ginter, J. L. (1998), On the Heterogeneity of Demand. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 384-389.
6. Allenby, G. M. and Ginter, J. L. (1995), Using Extremes to Design Products and Segment Markets, Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 392-403.
7. Allenby, G. M. and Rossi, P. E. (1999), Marketing Models of Consumer Heterogeneity, Journal of Econometrics, 89. 57-78.
8. Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Abe, M., Bockenholt, U., Bolduc, D., Gopinath, D., Mori- kawa, T., Ramaswamy, V., Rao, V., Revelt, D. and Steinberg, D. (1997), Modeling Methods for Discrete Choice Analysis, Marketing Letters; 8, 273-286.
9. Ben-Akiva, M. and Gershenfeld, S. (1998), Multi-featured Products and Services: Analyzing Pricing and Bundling Strategies, Journal of Forecasting. 17. 175-196.
10. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. R. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applica-tion to Travel Demand Cambridge.
11. Bockenholt, U., Bozdogan, H., DeSarbo, W. S., Dillon, W. R., Gupta, S., Kamakura, W., Kumar, A., Ramaswamy, V. and Zenor, M. (1994), Issues in the Specification and Ap-plication of Latent Structure Models of Choice, Marketing Letters, 5, 323-334.
12. Bretton-Clark (1992), Conjoint Analyzer, Morristown.
13. Cattin, P. and Wittink, D. (1982). Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey, Journal of Marketing, 46. 44-53.
14. Cohen, S. H. (1997), Perfect Union: CBCA Marries the Best of Conjoint and Discrete Choice Models, Marketing Research Magazine. 3, 12-17.
15. Cohen, S. H. and Ramaswamy, V. (1998), Latent Segmentation Models, Marketing Research Magazine. 10, 15-22.
16. Damien, P., Dellaportas, P. and Ramaswamy, V. (1998), How Many Segments: A Full Bayesian Approach for Latent Segmentation Models, presentation made at the Advanced Research Techniques Forum, Beaver Creek.
17. Damien, P. S., Wakefield, J. and Walker, G. (1999), Gibbs Sampling for Bayesian Noncon- jugate and Hierarchical Models Using Auxiliary Variables, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 61, 331-344.
18. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the E.M. Algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39. 1-38.
19. DeSarbo, W. S., Wedel, M., Vriens, M. and Ramaswamy, V. (1992), Latent Class Metric Conjoint Analysis, Marketing Letters. 3, 273-288.
20. DeSarbo, W. S., Oliver, R. L. and Rangaswamy, A. (1989), A Simulated Annealing Methodology for Clusterwise Linear Regression, Psychometrika, 54, 707-36.
21. DeSarbo, W. S., Ramaswamy, V. and Cohen, S. H. (1995), Market Segmentation with Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis, Marketing Letters, 6, 137-147.
22. Dillon, W. R. and Kumar, A. (1994), Latent Structure and Other Mixture Models in Marketing: An Integrative Survey and Overview, in: Bagozzi, R., ed., Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, Cambridge, 295-351.
23. Elrod, T., Louviere, J. J. and Davey, K. S. (1992), An Empirical Comparison of Ratings- based and Choice-based Conjoint Models, Journal of Marketing Research, 29. 368- 377.
24. Gelfand, A. E., and Smith, A. F. M. (1990), Sampling-based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398-409.
25. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. and Rubin, D. B. (1996), Bayesian Data Analysis, London.
26. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. and Spiegel halter, D. (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, London.
27. Green, P. E. and Krieger, A. M. (1991), Segmenting Markets with Conjoint Analysis, Journal of Marketing, 55. 20-31.
28. Green, P. E. and Rao, V. R. (1971), Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 355-363.
29. Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. (1990), Conjoint Analysis in Marketing Research: New Developments and Directions, Journal of Marketing 54, 3-19.
30. Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. (1978), Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues & Outlook, Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103-123.
31. Green, P. E. and Wind, Y. (1973), Multiattribute Decisions in Marketing: A Measurement Approach. Hinsdale.
32. Hagerty, M. R. (1985), The Cost of Simplifying Preference Models, Marketing Science, 5. 298-319.
33. Haley, R. L. (1985), Developing Effective Communications Strategy: A Benefit Segmentation Approachy New York.
34. Johnson, R. M. (1994), The CBC System for Choice-based Conjoint Analysis, Sawtooth Software.
35. Johnson, R. M. (1997), Individual Utilities from Choice Data: A New Method, Washington.
36. Kamakura, W. A. and Russell, G. J. (1989), A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure, Journal of Marketing Research. 26, 379-390.
37. Kamakura, W. A. (1988), A Least Squares Procedure for Benefit Segmentation with Conjoint Experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 157-167.
38. Krishnan, M., Ramaswamy, V., Meyer, M. C. and Damien, P. (1998), Customer Satisfaction for Financial Services: The Role of Products, Services, and Technology. Management Science, forthcoming.
39. Kuhfeld, W. F., Tobias, R. D. and Garratt, M. (1994), Efficient Experimental Designs with Marketing Research Applications. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 545-557.
40. Liechty, J., Ramaswamy, V., and Cohen, S. H. (1999), Menu-based Conjoint Analysis lor Mass Customization: An Application to a Web-based Information Service, working paper, Ann Arbor.
41. Louviere, J. J. (1988), Analyzing Individual Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis. Sage University Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series #67, Newbury Park.
42. Louviere, J. J. (1994), Conjoint Analysis, in: Bagozzi, R., ed., Advanced Methods of Marketing Research. Cambridge, 223-259.
43. Louviere, J. J., Ilensher, D. and Swait, J. (1999), Conjoint Preference Elicitation Methods in the Broader Context of Random Utility Theory Preference Elicitation Methods, Working paper. Sydney.
44. Louviere, J. J. and Woodvvortli, G. G. (1983), Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350-367.
45. McFadden, D. (1986), The Choice Theory Approach to Marketing Research, Marketing Science, 5. 275-297.
46. Moore, W. L. (1980). Levels of Aggregation in Conjoint Analysis: An Empirical Comparison, Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 516-523.
47. Ogawa, K. (1987), An Approach to Simultaneous Estimation and Segmentation in Conjoint Analysis, Marketing Science, 6, 66-81.
48. Oliphant, K., Eagle, T. C., Louviere, J. J. and Anderson, D. (1992), Cross-task Comparison of Ratings-based and Choice-based Con joint, Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, 383-394.
49. Punj, G. and Stewart, D. W. (1983). Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: A Review and Suggestions lor Applications, Journal of Marketing Research. 20, 134-148.
50. Ramaswamy, V. and DeSarbo, W. S. (1990). SCULPTRE: A New Methodology for Deriving and Analyzing Hierarchical Product-Market Structures from Panel Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 418-427.
51. Ramaswamy, V., DeSarbo, W. S., Reibstein, D. J. and Robinson, W. T. (1993), An Empirical Pooling Approach for Estimating Marketing Mix Elasticities with PIMS Data, Marketing Science, 12, 103-124.
52. Ramaswamy, V., Chatterjee, R., and Cohen, S. H. (1996), Joint Segmentation on Distinct Interdependent Bases with Categorical Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 337- 350.
53. Rossi, P. E., McCulloch, R. E. and Allenby, G. M. (1996), The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing. Marketing Science. 15. 321-340.
54. Smith, A. F. M., and Roberts, G. O. (1993), Bayesian Computations via the Gibbs Sampler and Related Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 55, 3-23.
55. Struh L S. (1994), Discrete Choice Modeling: Understanding a 'Better Conjoint than Conjoint', Quirk s Marketing Research Review, 8. 6-12.
56. Titterington, D. M. (1990), Some Recent Research in the Analysis of Mixture Distributions, Statistics, 4 619-641.
57. Vriens, M., Wedel, M. and Wilms, T. (1996), Metric Conjoint Segmentation Methods: A Monte Carlo Comparison, Journal of Marketing Research; 23, 73-85.
58. Wedel, M. and DeSarbo, W. S. (1994), A Review of Recent Developments in Latent Class Regression Models, in: Bagozzi. R. P., ed., Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, Cambridge, 352-388.
59. WedeL M. and Kamakura W. (1997), Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations. Boston.
60. Wedel, M. and Kistemaker, C. (1989), Consumer Benefit Segmentation using Clusterwise Linear Regression, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 6, 45-59.
61. Wedel, M. and Steenkamp, J. B. (1989), A Clustcrwise Regression Method for Simultaneous Fuzzy Market Structuring and Benefit Segmentation, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 385-396.
62. Wind, Y. (1978), Issues and Advances in Segmentation Research, Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 317-337.
63. Wittink, D. R. and Cattin, P. (1989), Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update, Journal of Marketing, 53, 91-96.
64. Wittink, D. R., Vriens, M. and Burhentie, W. (1994), Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis in Europe: Results and Critical Reflections, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15. 41-52.