When the book is better than the movie: How contrasting video cases influence text learning

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 337-355

  Beitzel, Brian ^a   Derry, Sharon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69149087457     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.40.3.e     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: The University Press.
2. Beitzel, B. D. (2004). Designing contrasting video case activities to facilitate learning of complex subject matter (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International, 65, 2893A.
3. Beitzel, B. D., & Serlin, R. C. (2009). Withering criticism: Or, how to humbly conclude a theory is wrong. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
6. Derry, S. J. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychologist, 31, 163-174.
7. Derry, S. J. (Ed.). (2007). Guidelines for video research in education. Chicago: Data Research and Development Center.
8. Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Feltovich, J., Nagarajan, A., Chernobilsky, E., & Halfpap, B. (2005). Making a mesh of it: A STELLAR approach to teacher professional development. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2005, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Nagarajan, A., Chernobilsky, E., & Beitzel, B. D. (2006). Cognitive transfer revisited: Can we exploit new media to solve old problems on a large scale? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 145-162.
10. diSibio, M. (1982). Memory for connected discourse: A constructivist view. Review of Educational Research, 52, 149-174.
11. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
12. Glenberg, A. M., Brown, M., & Levin, J. R. (2007). Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 389-399.
13. Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children's reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424-436.
14. Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1-26.
15. Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Hammer, D., & van Zee, E. (2006). Seeing the science in children's thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in physical science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. Krasny, K. A., Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2007). Unwarranted return: A response to McVee, Dunsmore, and Gavelek's (2005) "Schema Theory Revisited". Review of Educational Research, 77, 239-244.
18. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Levin, J. R., Serlin, R. C., & Seaman, M. A. (1994). A controlled, powerful multiple-comparison strategy for several situations. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 153-159.
20. Loftus, E. F. (2003). Make-believe memories. American Psychologist, 58, 867-873.
21. Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2007). Improving Native American children's
22. listening comprehension through concrete representations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 537-550.
23. McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75, 531-566.
24. McVee, M. B., Gavelek, J. R., & Dunsmore, K. L. (2007). Considerations of the social, individual, and embodied: A response to comments on "Schema Theory Revisited". Review of Educational Research, 77, 245-248.
25. Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321-334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (2007). Immediate and delayed effects of using a classroom case exemplar in teacher education: The role of presentation format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 194-206.
27. Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Peirce, C. S. (1986). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. In C. J. W. Kloesel (Ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce (Vol. 3, pp. 323-338). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
29. Poletiek, F. H. (2001). Hypothesis-testing behaviour. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
30. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
31. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475-522.
32. Schwartz, D. L., & Hartman, K. (2007). It's not television anymore: Designing digital video for learning and assessment. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 335-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden
34. efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 129-184.
35. Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers' professional vision in video clubs. In R.
36. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383-395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2007). Research on how people learn with and from video. In S. J. Derry (Ed.), Guidelines for video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel (pp. 47-58). Chicago: Data Research and Development Center.
38. Spiro, R. J. (1977). Remembering information from text: The "state of schema" approach. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 137-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P., & Ramchandran, A. (2007). Reflections on a post-Gutenberg epistemology for video use in ill-structured domains: Fostering complex learning and cognitive flexibility. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 93-100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P., Thota, J. J., & Feltovich, P. J. (2003). Cognitive flexibility theory: Hypermedia for complex learning, adaptive knowledge application, and experience acceleration. Educational Technology, 43(5), 5-10.
41. Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W. P., Schmitz, J. G., Samarapungavan, A., & Boerger, A. E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B. K. Britton & S.M. Glynn (Eds.), Executive control processes in reading (pp. 177-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Whewell, W. (1858). Novum organon renovatum. London: John W. Parker and Son.
43. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriulum Development.