Immediate and delayed effects of using a classroom case exemplar in teacher education: The role of presentation format

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 194-206

  Moreno, Roxana ^a   Valdez, Alfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Exemplars; Learning; Modeling; Teacher education; Video

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847607955     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.194     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. Artificial Intelligence Communications, 7, 39-59.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Armengol, E., & Plaza, E. (2003). Remembering similitude terms in case-based reasoning. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2734, 121-130.
4. Baggett, P. (1979). Structurally equivalent stories in movie and text and the effect of the medium on recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 333-356.
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Barnett, C. (1991). Building a case-based curriculum to enhance the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 263-272.
7. Barnett, C., & Tyson, P. (1999). Case methods and teacher change: Shifting authority to build autonomy. In M. Lundeberg, B. Levin, & H. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases, (pp. 53-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Beck, R. J., King, A., & Marshall, S. K. (2002). Effects of videocase construction on preservice teachers' observations of teaching. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 345-361.
9. Bikle, K., Billings, E., & Hakuta, K. (2003). Trends in two-way immersion research. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.). Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 589-606). New York: Macmillan.
10. Borich, G. D., & Tombari, M. L. (1997). Educational psychology: A contemporary approach. Harlow, NY: Longman.
11. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1998). The role of context in teacher learning and teacher education. In Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing teachers to enhance student success in the workplace and beyond. Information Series No. 376 (pp. 34-68). Columbus. OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education Center on Education and Training for Employment. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED429263)
12. Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2002). Observational learning and the effects of model-observer similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 405-415.
13. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61-100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
14. Cennamo, K. S. (1993). Learning from video. Factors influencing learners' preconceptions and invested mental effort. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 41, 33-45.
15. Copeland, W. D., & Decker, D. L. (1996). Video cases and the development of meaning making in preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 467-481.
16. Dembo, M. H. (1994). Applying educational psychology (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
17. Derry, S. J., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2005). Reconceptualizing teacher education: Supporting case-based instructional problem solving on the World Wide Web. In L. PytlikZillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Bruning (Eds.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 21-38). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
18. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2004). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Fetsco, T., & McClure, J. (2005). Educational psychology: An integrated approach to classroom decisions. Boston: Pearson Education.
22. Fitzgerald, G. E., & Semrau, L. P. (1998). The effects of learner differences on usage patterns and learning outcomes with hypermedia case studies. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 309-341.
23. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393-408.
24. Goodlad, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation's schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Harrington, J. L. (1999). Discovering teaching and learning through cases. In M. Lundeberg, B. Levin, & H. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 29-51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Henry, L. A., Castek, J., Roberts, L., Coiro, J., & Leu, D. J., Jr. (2004). Case technologies to enhance literacy learning: A new model for early literacy teacher preparation. Knowledge Quest, 33(2), 26-29.
27. Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Vaillancourt, B., & Yoon, S. (2003). New applications for multimedia cases: Promoting reflective practice in preservice teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11, 483-500.
28. Holmes Group. (1995). Tomorrow's school of education: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
29. Kamii, C. (Producer). (2000). Double-column addition: A teacher uses Piaget's theory [Motion picture]. (Available from Teachers College Press, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027)
30. Koehler, M. J. (2002). Designing case-based hypermedia for developing understanding of children's mathematical reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 151-195.
31. Koehler, M. J., & Lehrer, R. (1998). Designing a hypermedia tool for learning about children's mathematical cognition. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18, 123-145.
32. Koehler, M. J., Petrosino, A. J., & Lehrer, R. (1998). Designing cases for hypermedia environments in teacher education. In A. Bruckman, M. Guzdial, J. Kolodner, & A. Ram (Eds.), Proceedings from the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 324-325). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
33. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffman.
34. Kolodner, J. L., & Guzdial, M. (2000). Theory and practice of case-based learning aids. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 215-242). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Lacey, C. A., & Merseth, K. K. (1993). Cases, hypermedia and computer networks: Three auricular innovations for teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25, 543-551.
36. Laframboise, K. L., & Griffith, P. L. (1997). Using literature cases to examine diversity issues with preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 369-382.
37. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Investigating teaching: New pedagogies and new technologies for teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Lampert, M., Heaton, R., & Ball, D. (1994). Using technology to support a new pedagogy of mathematics teacher education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 276-289.
39. Lester, J. C., Towns, S. G., & Fitzgerald, P. J. (1999). Achieving affective impact: Visual emotive communication in lifelike pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 278-291.
40. Levin, B. B. (1999). The role of the facilitator in case discussions. In M. Lundeberg, B. Levin, & H. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 101-115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Lumsdaine, A. (1961). Instruments and media of instruction. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 583-682). Chicago: Rand McNally.
42. Lundeberg, M. (1999). Discovering teaching and learning through cases. In M. Lundeberg, B. Levin, & H. Harrington (Eds.). Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 3-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Lundeberg, M. A., Levin, B. B., & Harrington, H. L. (Eds.) (1999). Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Merseth, K. (1991). The case for cases in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.
45. Merseth, K. K. (1999). Foreword: A rationale for case-based pedagogy in teacher preparation. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.) Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. ix-xv). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Moreno, R. (2005). Instructional technology: Promise and pitfalls. In L. PytlikZillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Bruning (Eds.). Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 1-19). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
47. Ormrod, J. E. (2004). Educational psychology: Developing learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement design and analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Motivation and classroom learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.). Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (pp. 103-122). New York: Wiley.
50. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.
51. Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.). (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Richardson, V., & Kile, R. S. (1999). Learning from video-cases. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.). Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases. (pp. 121-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 629-639.
54. Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113-142.
56. Santrock, J. W. (2006). Educational psychology classroom update: Preparing for PRAXIS and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
57. Schank, R. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Schank, R. (1997). Virtual learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
59. Schunk, D. (2000). Learning theories (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
60. Sears, S. J., & Hersh, S. B. (1998). Contextual teaching and learning: An overview of the project. In Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing teachers to enhance student success in the workplace and beyond. Information Series No. 376 (pp. 1-16). Columbus, Oil: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education Center on Education and Training for Employment. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427263)
61. Shulman, J. H. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1-30). New York: Teachers College Press.
62. Shulman, J. H., & Colbert, J. A. (Eds.). (1988). The intern teacher case-book. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED296998)
63. Slavin, R. E. (2003). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
64. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50, 25-28.
66. Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 457-521). Washington. DC: American Educational Research Association.
67. Tang, J. C., & Isaacs, E. (1993). Why do users like video? Studies of multimedia-supported collaboration. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal, 1, 163-196.
68. Valmont, W. J. (1995). Creating videos for school use. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
69. van den Berg, E., Jansen, L., & Blijleven, P. (2004). Learning with multimedia cases: An evaluation study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12, 491-509.
70. Wetzel, C. D., Radtke, P. H., & Stern, H. W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. New York: Macmillan.
72. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
73. Wilkerson, L., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1996). Bridging problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367-427.
75. Williams, S. M., & Hmelo, C. E. (Eds.). (1998). Special issue: Learning through problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7.
76. Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational psychology (8th ed.). Developing a grading rubric [CD-ROM video clip]. (Available from Allyn & Bacon, 160 Gould Street, Needham Heights, MA 02494)
77. Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.