Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 389-399

  Glenberg, Arthur M ^a   Brown, Megan ^a   Levin, Joel R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

First grade; Manipulation; Reading; Reading comprehension; Reading groups; Reading intervention; Small groups

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249650750     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: 10902384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 577-660
2. Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Pavesi G., and Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology 73 (1995) 2608-2611
3. Fogassi L., Ferrari P.F., Gesierich B., Rozzi S., Chersi F., and Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308 (2005) 662-667
4. Gallase V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., and Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119 (1996) 593-609 (Part 2)
5. Gallese V., Keysers C., and Rizzolatti G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2004) 396-403
6. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Houghton Mifflin, New York
7. Glenberg A.M. What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1997) 1-19
8. Glenberg A.M., Gutierrez T., Levin J.R., Japuntich S., and Kaschak M.P. Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children's reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (2004) 424-436
9. Glenberg, A. M., Jaworski, B., & Rischal, M. (2005). Improving reading improves math. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
10. Glenberg A.M., Meyer M., and Lindem K. Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 26 (1987) 69-83
11. Glenberg A.M., and Robertson D.A. Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes 28 (1999) 1-26
12. Glenberg A.M., and Robertson D.A. Symbol grounding and meaning: a comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43 (2000) 379-401
13. Johnson-Laird P.N. Mental models (1983), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Kaschak M.P., Madden C.J., Therriault D.J., Yaxley R.H., Aveyard M., Blanchard A., et al. Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition 94 (2005) B79-B89
15. Kerst S., and Levin J.R. A comparison of experimenter-provided and subject-generated strategies in children's paired-associate learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 65 (1973) 300-303
16. Kintsch W. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 163-182
17. Koriat A., and Pearlman-Avnion S. Memory organization of action events and its relationship to memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (2003) 435-454
18. Kormi-Nouri R., Nyberg L., and Nilsson L.G. The effect of retrieval enactment on recall of subject-performed tasks and verbal tasks. Memory & Cognition 22 (1994) 723-728
19. Landauer T.K., and Dumais S.T. A solution to Plato's problem: the Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 211-240
20. Levin J.R. On functions of pictures in prose. In: Pirozzolo F.J., and Wittrock M.C. (Eds). Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (1981), Academic Press, New York 203-228
21. Levin J.R. Randomized classroom trials on trial. In: Phye G.D., Robinson D.H., and Levin J.R. (Eds). Empirical methods for evaluating educational interventions (2005), Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego 3-27
22. Levin J.R., Levin M.E., Glasman L.D., and Nordwall M.B. Mnemonic vocabulary instruction: additional effectiveness evidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology 17 (1992) 156-174
23. Marley S.C., and Levin J.R. Pictorial illustrations, visual imagery, and motor activity: their instructional implications for Native American children with learning disabilities. In: Morris R.J. (Ed). Disability research and policy: Current perspectives (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 103-123
24. Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2005, Apr.). Can text-relevant motor activity improve the recall of learning-disabled Native American children? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
25. Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2006, Aug.). Improving Native American children's processing of written text through concrete visual representations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.
26. Masur E.F. Maternal labeling of novel and familiar objects: implications for children's development of lexical constraints. Journal of Child Language 24 (1997) 427-439
27. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning (2001), Cambridge University Press, New York
28. Onwuegbuzie A.J., and Levin J.R. Without supporting statistical evidence, where would reported measures of substantive importance lead? To no good effect. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 2 (2003) 133-151
29. Paivio A. Mental representation: A dual coding approach (1986), Oxford University Press, New York
30. Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., and Barsalou L.W. Verifying properties from different modalities for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 119-124
31. Rizzolatti G., and Arbib M.A. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience 21 (1998) 188-194
32. Rubman C.N., and Waters H.S. A, B seeing: the role of constructive processes in children's comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (2000) 503-514
33. Sadoski M., and Paivio A. Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
34. Woodcock R.W. Woodcock reading mastery tests-Revised (1998), American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN