Cognitive transfer revisited: Can we exploit new media to solve old problems on a large scale?

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 145-162

  Derry, Sharon J ^a   Hmelo Silver, Cindy E ^b   Nagarajan, Anandi ^b   Chernobilsky, Ellina ^b   Beitzel, Brian D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347329610     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/0576-R724-T149-5432     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arbuagh, J. B., & Benbunan-Finch, R. (2005). Contextual, factors that influence ALN effectiveness. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Beitzel, B. D. (2004). Designing contrasting video case activities to facilitate learning of complex subject matter. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
3. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
4. Chernobilsky, E., Nagarajan, A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2005). Problem-based learning online: Multiple perspectives on collaborative knowledge construction. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers, & T-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 2005 (pp. 63-52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Derry, S. J. (2006). eSTEP as a case of theory-based web course design. In A. O'Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning and technology (pp. 171-196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Derry, S. J., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2005). Reconceptualizing teacher education: Supporting case-based instructional problem, solving on the World Wide Web. In L. PytlikZillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Bruning (Eds.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 21-38). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
8. Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Feltovich, J. Nagarajan, A., Chernobilsky, E., & Halfpap, B. (2005). Making a mesh of it: A STELLAR approach to teacher professional development. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers, & T-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 2005 (pp. 105-11.4). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Derry, S. J., Seymour, J., Steinkuehler, C., Lee, J., & Siegel, M. (2004). From ambitious vision to partially satisfying reality: An evolving socio-technical design supporting community and collaborative learning in teacher education. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 256-295). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, Netherlands: Open Universitat Nederland.
11. Goldman-Segall, R., & Maxwell, J. (2003). Computers, the internet, and new media for learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 393-427). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
12. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266.
13. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2006). Design principles for scaffolding technology-based inquiry. In A. M. O'Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.). Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology (pp. 1.47-170). Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum.
14. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Derry, S. J., Woods, D., DelMarcelle, M., & Chernobilsky, E. (2005). From parallel play to meshed interaction: The evolution of the eSTEP system. In D. Suthers, T. Koschmann, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 2005. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75, 531-566.
16. Nagarajan, A. (2006) Scaffolding preservice teachers in contrasting video case analysis activities. Dissertation in progress. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
17. Nagarajan, A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Chernobilsky, E. (2004). The benefits and challenges of learning from contrasting video cases. Poster presented at the International Conference for the Learning Sciences, Santa Monica, CA.
18. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475-522.
19. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. Duffy & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Swan, K., and Shea, P. (2005). The development of virtual learning communities. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.