Self-consistent estimation of inter-residue protein contact energies based on an equilibrium mixture approximation of residues

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 49-68

  Miyazawa, Sanzo ^a,b   Jernigan, Robert L ^b  

^a GUNMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Empirical potential; Knowledge based potential; Protein fold recognition; Quasi chemical approximation; Statistical potential

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENERGY TRANSFER; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 0032960853     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990101)34:1<49::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-L     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
2. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256: 623-644.
3. Hinds DA, Levitt M. A lattice model for protein structure prediction at low resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2536-2540.
4. Hinds DA, Levitt M. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J Mol Biol 1994;243:668-682.
5. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
6. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 1993;16:92-112.
7. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Protein stability for single substitution mutants and the extent of local compactness in the denatured state. Protein Eng 1994;7:1209-1220.
8. Hendlich M, Lackner P, Weitckus S, Floechner H, Froschauer R, Gottsbachner K, Casari G, Sippl MJ. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models; the calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;216:167-180.
9. Sippl MJ, Weitckus S. Detection of native-like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three-dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformations. Proteins 1992;13:258-271.
10. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
11. Godzik A, Skolnick J. Sequence-structure matching in globular proteins: Application to super-secondary and tertiary structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:12098-12102.
12. Kocher J-PA, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1598-1613.
13. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Empirical energy potentials with reference states for protein fold and sequence recognition. Submitted.
14. Godzik A, Koliński A, Skolnick J. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 1995;4:2107-2117.
15. Bowie JU, Lüthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
16. Nishikawa K, Matsuo Y. Development of pseudoenergy potentials for assessing protein 3-D-1-D compatibility and detecting weak homologies. Protein Eng 1993;6:811-820.
17. Matsuo Y, Nakamura H, Nishikawa K. Detection of protein 3D-1D compatibility characterized by the evaluation of side-chain packing and electrostatic interactions. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1995;118:137-148.
18. Lüthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 1992;356:83-85.
19. Pellegrini M, Doniach S. Computer simulation of antibody binding specificity. Proteins 1993;15:436-444.
20. Altuvia Y, Schueler O, Margalit H. Ranking potential binding peptides to MHC molecules by a computational threading approach. J Mol Biol 1995;249:244-250.
21. Wallqvist A, Jernigan RL, Covell DG. A preference-based free-energy parameterization of enzyme-inhibitor binding. Applications to HIV-1-protease inhibitor design. Protein Sci 1995;4:1881-1903.
22. Wilson C, Doniach S. A computer model to dynamically simulate protein folding: Studies with crambin. Proteins 1989;6:193-209.
23. Skolnick J, Kolinski A. Simulations of folding of a globular proteins. Science 1990;250:1121-1125.
24. Sun S. Reduced representation model of protein structure prediction: Statistical potential and genetic algorithms. Protein Sci 1993;2:762-785.
25. Koliński A, Skolnick J. Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme. Proteins 1994;18:338-352.
26. Miller S, Janin J, Lesk AM, Chothia C. Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J Mol Biol 1987;196:641-656.
27. Pohl FM. Empirical protein energy maps. Nature New Biol 1971;234:277-279.
28. Pohl FM. Statistical analysis of protein structures. In: Jaenieke R, editor. Protein Folding. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press; 1980. p 183-196.
29. Némethy G, Scheraga HA. Protein folding. Quart Rev Biophys 1977;10:239-352.
30. Bryant S, Lawrence CE. The frequency of ion-pair substructures in proteins is quantitatively related to electrostatic potential: A statistical model for nonbonded interactions. Proteins 1991;9:108-119.
31. MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. Influence of proline residues on protein formation. J Mol Biol 1991;218:397-412.
32. Rashin AA, Ionif M, Honig B. Internal cavities and buried waters in globular proteins. Biochemistry 1986;25:3619-3625.
33. Thomas PD, Dill KA. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: How accurate are they? J Mol Biol 1996;257:457-469.
34. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 1996;264: 1164-1179.
35. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996; 258:367-392.
36. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 1953;21:1087-1092.
37. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB et al. The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
38. Raghunathan G, Jernigan RL. Ideal architecture of residues packing and its observation in protein structures. Protein Sci 1997;6:2072-2083.
39. Nozaki Y, Tanford C. The solubility of amino acids and two glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions; establishment of hydrophobicity scale. J Biol Chem 1971;246:2211-2217.
40. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. Scop: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
41. Gutin AM, Badretdinov AYa, Finkelstein AV. Why are the statistics of globular protein structure Boltzmann-like? Mol Biol (Russia), Engl Transl 1992;26:94-102.
42. Finkelstein AV, Badretdinov AYa, Gutin AM. Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins 1995;23: 142-150.
43. Skolnick J, Jaroszewski L, Kolinski A, Godzik A. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasi-chemical approximation correct? Protein Sci 1997;6:676-688.
44. Munson PJ, Singh RK. Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Prot Sci 1997;6:1467-1481.
45. Sippl MJ. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1993;7:473-501.
46. Hendlich M, P Lackner S, Witckus H et al. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models; the calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;216:167-180.