Of politics and purpose: Political salience and goal ambiguity of US federal agencies

Public Administration

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 457-484

  Lee, Jung Wook ^a   Rainey, Hal G ^b   Chun, Young Han ^c  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; BUREAUCRACY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FEDERAL SYSTEM;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 68349127202     PISSN: 00333298     EISSN: 14679299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01772.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (126)

1. Aberbach, J.D. 1990. Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2. Aberbach, J.D. and T. Christensen. 2003. 'Translating "Theoretical Ideas" into Modern State Reform: Economic-Inspired Reforms and Competing Models of Governance', Administration & Society, 35, 5, 491-509.
3. Allison, G.T. 1983. 'Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?', in J.L. Perry and K.L. Kraemer (eds), Public Management. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, pp. 72-91.
4. Balla, S.J. 1998. 'Administrative Procedure and Political Control of the Bureaucracy', American Political Science Review, 92, 3, 663-73.
5. Barzelay, M. 2001. The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6. Behn, R.D. 1998. 'What Right Do Public Managers Have to Lead?', Public Administration Review, 58, 3, 209-24.
7. Blumenthal, W.M. 1983. 'Candid Reflections of a Businessman in Washington', in J.L. Perry and K.L. Kraemer (eds), Public Management. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, pp. 22-33.
8. Bohte, J. and K. Meier. 2000. 'Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating', Public Administration Review, 60, 2, 173-82.
9. Boyatzis, R.E. 1982. The Competent Manager. New York: John Wiley.
10. Boyne, G.A. and A.A. Chen. 2007. 'Performance Targets and Public Service Improvement', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 3, 455-77.
11. Bozeman, B. 2000. Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Breul, J.D. 2007. 'GPRA-A foundation for Performance Budgeting', Public Performance & Management Review, 30, 3, 312-31.
13. Brudney, J.L. and F.T. Hebert. 1987. 'State Agencies and Their Environments: Examining the Influence of Important External Actors', Journal of Politics, 49, 1, 186-206.
14. Buchanan, B. 1974. 'Government Managers, Business Executives, and Organizational Commitment', Public Administration Review, 35, 4, 339-47.
15. Buchanan, B. 1975. 'Red Tape and the Service Ethic: Some Unexpected Differences between Public and Private Managers', Administration and Society, 6, 4, 423-38.
16. Burkhead, J. and J. Miner. 1971. Public Expenditure. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
17. Chun, Y.H. and H.G. Rainey. 2005a. 'Goal Ambiguity in US Federal Agencies', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 1, 1-30.
18. Chun, Y.H. and H.G. Rainey. 2005b. 'Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in US Federal Agencies', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 4, 529-57.
19. Chun, Y.H. and H.G. Rainey. 2006. 'Consequences of Goal Ambiguity in Public Organizations', in G. Boyne, K. Meier, L. O'Toole Jr., and R. Walker (eds), Public Service Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92-112.
20. Cooper, P.J. 1996. 'Understanding What the Law Says about Administrative Responsibility', in J.L. Perry (ed.), Handbook of Public Administration, 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 115-35.
21. Daft, R.L. 2004. Organization Theory and Design, 8th edn. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.
22. Dahl, R.A. and C.E. Lindblom. 1953. Politics, Economics, and Welfare. New York: Harper and Row.
23. Derthick, M. 1990. Agency under Stress: The Social Security Administration in American Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24. DiMaggio, P. 1987. 'Nonprofit Organizations in the Production and Distribution of Culture', in W. Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 203-18.
25. Downs, A. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. New York: Little Brown.
26. Dull, M. 2006. 'Why PART? The Institutional Politics of Presidential Budget Reform', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 2, 187-216.
27. Eisner, M.A., and K.J. Meier. 1990. 'Presidential Control versus Bureaucratic Power: Explaining the Reagan Revolution in Antitrust', American Journal of Political Science, 34, 1, 269-87.
28. Epstein, D., and S. O'Halloran. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Epstein, L. and J.A. Segal. 2000. 'Measuring Issue Salience', American Journal of Political Science, 44, 1, 66-83.
30. Feldman, M. 1989. Order without Design: Information Production and Policy Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Fenno, R.F. 1978. Home Style: Representatives in Their Districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
32. Fesler, J.W. 1980. Public Administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33. Franklin, A.L. 1999. 'Managing for Results in Arizona: A Fifth-Year Report Card', Public Productivity and Management Review, 23, 2, 194-209.
34. Furlong, S.R. 1998. 'Political Influence on the Bureaucracy: The Bureaucracy Speaks', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 1, 39-65.
35. Gable, C. 1998. Strategic Action Planning Now! A Guide for Setting and Meeting Your Goals. New York: St Lucie.
36. Gilmour, J.B. and D.E. Lewis. 2006. 'Assessing Performance Budgeting at OMB: The Iinfluence of Politics, Performance, and Program Size', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 2, 169-86.
37. Gormley, W. 1989. Taming the Bureaucracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Hammond, T. and J. Knott. 1996. 'Who Controls the Bureaucracy? Presidential Power, Congressional Dominance, Legal Constraints, and Bureaucratic Autonomy in a Model of Multi-Institutional Policy-Making', Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 12, 1, 119-66.
39. Hargrove, E.C. and J.C. Glidewell (eds). 1990. Impossible Jobs in Public Management. Lawrence. KS: University of Kansas Press.
40. Hirschmann, D. 2002. 'Thermometer or Sauna?: Performance Measurement and Democratic Assistance in the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)', Public Administration, 80, 2, 235-55.
41. Ho, A. 2007. 'GPRA after a Decade: Lessons from the Government Performance and Results Act and Related Federal Reforms', Public Performance & Management Review, 30, 3, 307-11.
42. Hood, C. and A. Dunsire. 1981. Bureaumetrics: The Quantitative Comparison of British Central Government Agencies. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
43. Huber, J.D. and C.R. Shipan. 2002. Deliberate Discretion: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Ingraham, P.W., P.G. Joyce and A.K. Donahue. 2003. Government Performance: Why Management Matters. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45. James, O. 2004. 'The UK Core Executives Use of Public Service Agreements as a Tool of Governance', Public Administration, 82, 2, 397-419.
46. Kelemen, M. 2000. 'Too Much or Too Little Ambiguity: The Language of Total Quality Management', Journal of Management Studies, 37, 4, 483-98.
47. Kettl, D.F. 2000. The Global Public Management Reform: A Report on the Transformation of Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
48. Kiousis, S. 2004. 'Explicating Media Salience: A Factor Analysis of New York Times Issue Coverage during the 2000 US Presidential Election', Journal of Communication, 54, 1, 71-87.
49. Knott, J.H. and G.J. Miller. 1987. Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of Institutional Choice. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
50. Krause, G.A. 1996. 'The Institutional Dynamics of Policy Administration: Bureaucratic Influence over Securities Regulation', American Journal of Political Science, 40, 1083-121.
51. Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52. Lee T.W., E.A. Locke and G.P. Latham. 1989. 'Goal Setting Theory and Job Performance', in L. A. Pervin (ed.), Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 291-326.
53. LeLoup, L.T. and S.A. Shull. 2003. The President and Congress: Collaboration and Combat in National Policymaking, 2nd edn. New York: Longman.
54. Lewis, D.E. 2003. Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1947-1997. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55. Light, P. 1995. Thickening Government: Federal Hierarchy and the Diffusion of Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
56. Lindblom, C.E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.
57. Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
58. Locke, E.A., D. Chah, S. Harrison and N. Lustgarten. 1989. 'Separating the Effects of Goal Specificity from Goal Level', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 27-88.
59. Locke, E.A. and G.P. Latham. 2002. 'Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey', American Psychologist, 57, 9, 705-17.
60. Lowi, T. 1979. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: Norton.
61. Lynn, L.E. 1981. Managing the Public's Business. New York: Basic Books.
62. Macey, J.R. 1992. 'Organizational Design and Political Control of Administrative Agencies', Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 8, 1, 93-100.
63. March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen. 1976. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
64. Mayhew, D.R. 1974. The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65. McCubbins, M.D., R.G. Noll and B.R. Weingast. 1987. 'Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control', Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3, 2, 243-77.
66. McCubbins, M.D., R.G. Noll and B.R. Weingast. 1989. 'Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies', Virginia Law Review, 75, 2, 431-82.
67. Meier, K.J. 2000. Politics and the Bureaucracy, 4th edn. New York: Harcourt College Publishers.
68. Meier, K.J. and G.A. Krause. 2003. 'Conclusion: An Agenda for the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy', in G. A. Krause and J. K. Meier (eds), Politics, Policy, and Organizations: Frontiers in the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 292-307.
69. Melnick, R.S. 1983. Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
70. Merton, R. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
71. Meyer, M.W. 1979. Change in Public Bureaucracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Moe, T.M. 1982. 'Regulatory Performance and Presidential Administration', American Journal of Political Science, 26, 2, 197-224.
73. Moe, T.M. 1984. 'The New Economics of Organization', American Journal of Political Science, 28, 4, 739-77.
74. Moe, T.M. 1989. 'The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure', in P.E. Peterson and J.E. Chubb (eds), Can the Government Govern? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 267-330.
75. Moynihan, D.P. 2006a. 'What Do We Talk about When We Talk about Performance? Dialogue Theory and Performance Budgeting', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 2, 151-68.
76. Moynihan, D.P. 2006b. 'Managing for Results in State Government: Evaluating a Decade of Reform', Public Administration Review, 66, 1, 77-89.
77. Nathan, R.P. 1983. Administrative Presidency. New York: Wiley.
78. Nether, J., W. Wasserman and M.H. Kutner. 1989. Applied Linear Regression Models, 2nd edn. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
79. Noordegraaf, M. and T. Abma. 2003. 'Management by Measurement? Public Management Practices Amidst Ambiguity', Public Administration, 81, 4, 853-71.
80. O'Sullivan, E. and G.R. Rassel. 1999. Research Methods for Public Administrators, 3rd edn. New York: Longman.
81. Pandey, S.K. and B.E. Wright. 2006. 'Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Manager's Role Ambiguity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 4, 511-32.
82. Perrin, B. 2006. Moving from Outputs to Outcomes: Practical Advice from Governments around the World. Arlington, VA: The IBM Center for the Business of Government.
83. Pitt, D.C. and B.C. Smith. 1981. Government Departments: An Organizational Perspective. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
84. Pollitt, C. 2006. 'Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 1, 25-44.
85. Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2000. Public Management Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. Posner, P.L. and D.M. Fantone. 2007. 'Assessing Federal Program Performance: Observations on the US Office of Management and Budget's Program Assessment Rating Tool and Its Use in the Budget Process', Public Performance & Management Review, 30, 3, 351-68.
87. Radin, B.A. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
88. Rainey, H.G., S.K. Pandey and B. Bozeman. 1995. 'Public and Private Managers' Perceptions of Red Tape', Public Administration Review, 55, 6, 567-74.
89. Richards, M.D. 1986. Setting Strategic Goals and Objectives, 2nd edn. St Paul, MN: West.
90. Ringquist, E.J., J. Worsham and M.A. Eisner. 2003. 'Salience, Complexity, and the Legislative Direction of Regulatory Bureaucracies', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 2, 141-64.
91. Rosenbloom, D.H. 2001. 'Whose Bureaucracy Is This, Anyway? Congress 1946 Answer', Political Science and Politics, 34, 4, 773-7.
92. Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
93. Scott, W.R. 2003. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
94. Segal, J.A. and H.J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Sharkansky, I. 1982. Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
96. Sigal, L.V. 1973. Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of Newsmaking. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
97. Simon, H.A. 1964. 'On the Concept of Organizational Goal', Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 1, 1-22.
98. Smith, D.K. 1999. Make Success Measurable! New York: John Wiley.
99. Stehr, S.D. 1997. 'Top Bureaucrats and the Distribution of Influence in Reagan's Executive Branch', Public Administration Review, 57, 1, 75-82.
100. Stillman, R.J. 2004. The American Bureaucracy: The Core of Modern Government, 3rd edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
101. Thompson, J.D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
102. US General Accounting Office. 2004. Performance Budgeting: Observations on the Use of OMB's Program Assessment Rating Tool for the Fiscal Year 2004 Budget. Washington, DC: GAO.
103. US General Accounting Office. 1997. The Government Performance and Results Act: 1997 Governmentwide Implementation Will Be Uneven. Washington, DC: GAO.
104. US General Accounting Office. 1999. Managing for Results: Opportunities for Continued Improvements in Agencies' Performance Plans. Washington, DC: GAO.
105. US Office of Management and Budget. 2001. OMB Circular No. A-11. Washington, DC: US Office of Management and Budget.
106. US Office of Management and Budget. 2003. Performance and Management Assessment. Washington, DC: US Office of Management and Budget.
107. Van Horn, C.E., D.C. Baumer and W.T. Gormley. 2001. Politics and Public Policy, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
108. Volden, C. 2002. 'Delegating Power to Bureaucracies: Evidence from the States', Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 18, 2, 187-220.
109. Walker, R.M. and G.A. Boyne. 2006. 'Public Management Reform and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Assessment of the UK Labour Government's Public Service Improvement Strategy', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 2, 371-93.
110. Wamsley, G.L. and M.N. Zald. 1973. The Political Economy of Public Organizations. Lexington, MA: Heath.
111. Warwick, D.P. 1975. A Theory of Public Bureaucracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
112. Waterman, R.W., R. Amelia and R. Wright. 1998. 'The Venues of Influence: A New Theory of Political Control of the Bureaucracy', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 1, 13-38.
113. Weingast, B.R. and M.J. Moran. 1983. 'Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission', Journal of Political Economy, 91, 5, 765-800.
114. Weiss, J.A. and S.K. Piderit. 1999. 'The Value of Mission Statements in Public Agencies', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 2, 193-223.
115. West, W.F. 1995. Controlling the Bureaucracy: Institutional Constraints in Theory and Practice. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
116. Whitford, A.B. 2005. 'The Pursuit of Political Control by Multiple Principals', Journal of Politics, 67, 1, 29-49.
117. Whitford, A.B. and J. Yates. 2003. 'Policy Signals and Executive Governance: Presidential Rhetoric in the War on Drugs', Journal of Politics, 65, 4, 995-1012.
118. Wildavsky, A. 1979. Speaking Truth to Power. Boston: Little, Brown.
119. Wilson, J.Q. 1989. Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
120. Winter, J.P. and C.H. Eyal. 1981. 'Agenda Setting for the Civil Rights Issue', Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 3, 376-83.
121. Wlezien, C. 2005. 'On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with "Most Important Problem"', Electoral Studies, 24, 4, 555-79.
122. Wood, B.D. and J. Bohte. 2004. 'Political Transaction Costs and the Politics of Administrative Design', Journal of Politics, 66, 1, 176-202.
123. Wood, B.D. and R.W. Waterman. 1994. Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role of Bureaucracy in a Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
124. Worsham, J. and J. Gatrell. 2005. 'Multiple Principals, Multiple Signals: A Signaling Approach to Principal-Agent Relations', Policy Studies Journal, 33, 3, 363-76.
125. Wright, B.E. 2004. 'The Role of Work Context in Work Motivation: A Public Sector Application of Goal and Social Cognitive Theories', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 1, 59-78.
126. Yates, D. 1982. Bureaucratic Democracy: The Search for Democracy and Efficiency in American Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.