Inactivation of salmonella enteritidis in chicken breast fillets by single-cycle and multiple-cycle high pressure treatments

Foodborne Pathogens and Disease

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 577-581

  Morales, Pilar ^a   Calzada, Javier ^a   Rodríguez, Buenaventura ^a   De Paz, Maximo ^a   Nuñez, Manuel ^a  

^a INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIOSTASIS; BREAST FILLET; CHICKEN; COLONY FORMING UNIT; FOOD PROCESSING; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MEAT; MULTIPLE CYCLE HIGH PRESSURE TREATMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SHIGELLA; SINGLE CYCLE HIGH PRESSURE TREATMENT; STRAIN IDENTIFICATION;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DISINFECTION; FOOD HANDLING; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; POULTRY; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SHIGELLA;

EID: 67650787366     PISSN: 15353141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2008.0218     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alpas H, Kalchayanand N, Bozoglu F, et al. Variation in resistance to hydrostatic pressure among strains of food-borne pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:4248-4251.
2. Antunes P, Réu C, Sousa JC, et al. Incidence of Salmonella from poultry products and their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Int J Food Microbiol 2003;82:97-103.
3. Baeumler AJ, Hargis BM, and Tsolis RM. Epidemiology - tracing the origins of Salmonella outbreaks. Science 2000;287:50-52.
4. Bari ML, Ukuku DO, Mori M, et al. Effect of hydrostatic pressure pulsing on the inactivation of Salmonella Enteritidis in liquid whole egg. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2008;5:175-182.
5. Bohaychuck VM, Gensler GE, King RK, et al. Occurrence of pathogens in raw and ready to eat meat and poultry products collected from the retail marketplace in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. J Food Prot 2006;69:2176-2182.
6. Capita R, Alvarez-Astorga M, Alonso-Calleja C, et al. Occurrence of salmonellae in retail chicken carcasses and their products in Spain. Int J Food Microbiol 2003;81:169-173.
7. D'Aoust J. Salmonella species. In: Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers. Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, and Montville TJ (eds). Washington, DC: ASM, 1997, pp. 129-158.
8. De Lamo-Castellví S, Roig-Sagués AX, López-Pedemonte T, et al. Response of two Salmonella enterica strains inoculated in model cheese treated with high hydrostatic pressure. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:99-109.
9. Guan D, Chen H, and Hoover DG. Inactivation of Salmonella typhimurium DT 104 in UHT whole milk by high hydrostatic pressure. Int J Food Microbiol 2005;104:145-153.
10. Hayakawa I, Kanno T, Yoshiyama K, et al. Oscillatory compared with continuous high pressure sterilization on Bacillus stearothermophilus spores. J Food Sci 1994;59:164-167.
11. Huang E, Mittal GS, and Griffiths MW. Inactivation of Salmonella enteritidis in liquid whole egg using combination treatments of pulsed electric field, high pressure and ultrasound. Biosystems Eng 2006;94:403-413.
12. Jofre A, Aymerich T, and Garriga M. Assessment of the effectiveness of antimicrobial packaging combined with high pressure to control Salmonella sp. in cooked ham. Food Control 2008a;19:634-638.
13. Jofre A, Garriga M, and Aymerich T. Inhibition of Salmonella sp., Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus in cooked ham by combining antimicrobials, high hydrostatic pressure and refrigeration. Meat Sci 2008b;78:53-59.
14. Marcos B, Aymerich T, and Garriga M. Evaluation of high pressure processing as an additional hurdle to control Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica in low-acid fermented sausages. J Food Sci 2005;70:M339-M344.
15. Metrick C, Hoover DG, and Farkas DF. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on heat-resistant and heat-sensitive strains of Salmonella. J Food Sci 1989;54:1547-1549, 1564.
16. Morales P, Calzada J, Avila M, et al. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef by single-cycle and multiple-cycle high pressure treatments. J Food Prot 2007;71:811-815.
17. Naugle AL, Barlow KE, Eblen DR, et al. U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service testing for Salmonella in selected raw meat and poultry products in the United States, 1998 through 2003: analysis of set results. J Food Prot 2006;69:2607-2614.
18. O'Brien JK and Marshall RT. Microbiological quality of raw ground chicken processed at high isostatic pressure. J Food Prot 1996;59:146-150.
19. Palou E, Lopez-Malo A, Barbosa-Canovas GV, et al. Effect of oscillatory high hydrostatic pressure treatments on Byssochlamys nivea ascospores suspended in fruit juice concentrates. Lett Appl Microbiol 1998;27:375-378.
20. Pintar K, Cook A, Pollari F, et al. Quantitative effect of refrigerated storage time on the enumeration of Campylobacter, Listeria, and Salmonella on artificially inoculated raw chicken meat. J Food Prot 2007;70:739-743.
21. Ponce E, Pla R, Sendra E, et al. Destruction of Salmonella enteritidis inoculated in liquid whole egg by high hydrostatic pressure: comparative study in selective and non-selective media. Food Microbiol 1999;16:357-365.
22. Sherry AE, Patterson MF, and Madden RH. Comparison of 40 Salmonella enterica serovars injured by thermal, high-pressure and irradiation stress. J Appl Microbiol 2004;96:887-893.
23. Soultos N, Koidis P, and Madden RH. Presence of Listeria and Salmonella spp. in retail chicken in Northern Ireland. Lett Appl Microbiol 2003;37:421-423.
24. Wuytack EY, Duong Thi Phuong L, Aertsen A, et al. Comparison of sublethal injury induced in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by heat and by different nonthermal treatments. J Food Prot 2003;66:31-37.
25. Yuste J, Capellas M, Pla R, et al. Use of conventional media and thin agar layer method for recovery of foodborne pathogens from pressure-treated poultry products. J Food Sci 2003;68: 2321-2324.
26. Yuste J, Pla R, Capellas M, et al. Oscillatory high pressure processing applied to mechanically recovered poultry meat for bacterial inactivation. J Food Sci 2001;66:482-484.