Student performance and attitudes under formative evaluation by teacher, self and peer evaluators

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 393-410

  Ozogul, Gamze ^a   Sullivan, Howard ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Formative; Peer; Self; Teacher; Training

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650079778     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-007-9052-7     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, T., Howe, C., Soden, R., Halliday, J., & Low, J. (2001). Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further-education students. Instructional Science, 29, 1-32.
2. Andrade, H. G., & Boulay, B. A. (2003). Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 21-32.
3. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes. Assessment and Evaluation In Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441.
4. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom, learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-75.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people ¡earn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington D.C.: National. Academy Press.
6. Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programs. Teaching In Higher Education, 3(1), 79-89.
7. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 347-355.
8. Davies, P. (2002). Using students' reflective self-assessment for awarding degree classifications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(4), 307-319.
9. Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 342-361.
10. Elawar, C. M., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers' written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 162-173.
11. Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 0(2), 229-245.
12. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. R. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 407-417.
14. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Farmer Press.
15. Gopinath, C. (1999). Alternatives to instructor assessment for class participation. Journal of Education for Business, 75(1), 10-14.
16. Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(1), 53-70.
17. Kitsantas, A., Reiser, R. A., & Doster, J. (2004). Developing self-regulated learners: Goal setting, selfevaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 269-287.
18. Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 93-103.
19. Miller, L., & Ng, R. (1994). Peer assessment of oral proficiency. Working papers of the Department of English City Polytechnic of Hong Kong, 6, 41-56.
20. Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. (2002). Effects of classroom evaluation strategies on student achievement and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 61-75.
21. Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. (2004). Student self-evaluation, teacher evaluation and learner performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 5-22.
22. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Railing, K. (1.997). A. study in self-assessment: Tutor and students' perceptions of performance criteria. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 357-369.
23. Ozogul, G., Olina, Z., & Sullivan. H. (2007). Teacher, self and peer evaluation of lesson plans written by preservice teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, doi: 10.1007/s 11423-0069012-7.
24. Reiser, R. A. (1994). Examining the planning practices of teachers: Reflections on three years of research. Educational Technology, 34(3), 11-16.
25. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
26. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation: Vol. 1 AERA monograph series on curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
27. Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 71-81.
28. Smith, K. (2000). Self-assessment of English as a foreign language in applying for jobs and higher education studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 315-330.
29. Stiggins, R. J. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
30. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in college and university. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-267.
31. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation InHigher Education, 25(2), 1.49-167.
32. Weston, C., Maistre, C. L., McAlpine, L., & Bordonaro, T. (1997). The influence of participants in formative evaluation on the improvement of learning from, written instructional materials. Instructional Science, 25, 369-386.
33. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34. Williams, E. (1992). Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 17(1), 45-58.
35. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition In educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Makwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Wolf, D., Bixby, J., III Glenn, J., & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31-74.
37. Zhang, S. (1995). Re-examining the affective advantages of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second. Language Writing, 4(3), 209-222.