Teacher, self and peer evaluation of lesson plans written by preservice teachers

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 181-201

  Ozogul, Gamze ^a   Olina, Zane ^b   Sullivan, Howard ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Lesson plan; Peer; Preservice; Research; Self; Teacher

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749089875     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-006-9012-7     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andrade, H. G., & Boulay, B. A. (2003). Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 21-32.
2. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441.
3. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-75.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
5. Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programs. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-89.
6. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 233-239.
7. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
8. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 347-355.
9. Davies, P. (2002). Using students reflective self-assessment for awarding degree classifications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(4):307-319.
10. Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 342-361.
11. Elawar, C. M., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers' written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 162-173.
12. Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), 146-166.
13. Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395-430.
14. Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-245.
15. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. R. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 407-417.
17. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press.
18. Kitsantas, A., & Baylor, A. (2001). The impact of the instructional planning self-reflective tool on preservice teacher performance, disposition, and self-efficacy beliefs regarding systematic instructional planning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 97-106.
19. Liu, Z. F. E., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Alternatives to instructor assessment: A case study of comparing self and peer assessment under a networked innovative assessment procedure. International Journal of Media, 29(4), 395-403.
20. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A source book of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21. Miller, L., & Ng, R. (1994). Peer assessment of oral proficiency. Working papers of the Department of English City Polytechnic of Hong Kong, 6:41-56.
22. Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. (2002). Effects of classroom evaluation strategies on student achievement and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 61-75.
23. Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. (2004). Student self-evaluation, teacher evaluation and learner performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 5-22.
24. Reiser, R. A. (1994). Examining the planning practices of teachers: Reflections on three years of research. Educational Technology, 34(3), 11-16.
25. Roberts, S. K., & Hsu. Y. S. (2000). The tools of teacher education: Preservice teachers use of technology to create instructional materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 133-152.
26. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
27. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation: Vol. 1. AERA Monograph series on curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
28. Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1).
29. Stiggins, R. J. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
30. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-167.
31. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Makwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J. III, & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31-74.
34. Zhang, S., (1995). Re-examining the affective advantages of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209-222.