Exploring gender differences with different gain calculations in astronomy and biology

American Journal of Physics

Volumn 77, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 651-657

  Willoughby, Shannon D ^a   Metz, Anneke ^a  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649172871     PISSN: 00029505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1119/1.3133087     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. L. C. McDermott and E. F. Redish, " Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics education research.," Am. J. Phys. 0002-9505 67, 755-767 (1999). 10.1119/1.19122
2. D. Hestenes, M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer, " Force concept inventory.," Phys. Teach. 0031-921X 30, 141-158 (1992). 10.1119/1.2343497
3. G. L. Deming, " Results of the astronomy diagnostic test national project.," Astron. Educ. Rev. 1539-1515 1, 52-57 (2001). 10.3847/AER2001005
4. R. R. Hake, " Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses.," Am. J. Phys. 0002-9505 66, 64-74 (1998). 10.1119/1.18809
5. V. P. Coletta and J. A. Phillips, " Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability.," Am. J. Phys. 0002-9505 73, 1172-1182 (2005). 10.1119/1.2117109
6. M. K. Hemenway, W. J. Straits, R. R. Wilke, and B. Hufnagel, " Educational research in an introductory astronomy course.," Innovative High. Educ. 26, 271-280 (2002). 10.1023/A:1015881030221 0742-5627
7. B. Hufnagel, T. Slater, G. L. Deming, J. Adams, R. L. Adrian, C. Brick, and M. Zeilik, " Pre-course results from the astronomy diagnostic test.," Electr. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 1323-3580 17 (2), 152-155 (2000).
8. Information available at 〈 http://www.bioliteracy.net 〉.
9. K. Garvin-Doxas, M. Klymkowsky, and S. Elrod, " Building, using and maximizing the impact of concept inventories in the biological sciences: Report on the National Science Foundation-sponsored conference on the construction of concept inventories in the biological sciences.," CBE Life Sci. Educ. 6, 277-282 (2007). 10.1187/cbe.07-05-0031 1931-7913
10. K. Garvin-Doxas and M. Klymkowsky, " Building the biology concept inventory.," 〈 http://www.bioliteracy.net/Readings/papersSubmittedPDF/ Gavin-Doxas%20and%20Klymkowsky.pdf 〉.
11. E. Seymour, D. J. Wiese, and A. B. Hunter, " Creating a better mousetrap: On-line student assessment of their learning gains.," Paper presented at the National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, San Francisco, March 2000 (http://www.sencer.net/Assessmemt/pdfs/Assessment/ Creating-a-Better-Mousetrap.pdf).
12. N. Bowers, M. Brandon, and C. D. Hill, " The use of a knowledge survey as an indicator of student learning in an introductory biology course.," CBE Life Sci. Educ. 4, 311-322 (2005). 10.1187/cbe.04-11-0056 1931-7913
13. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, edited by, B. S. Bloom, (Longman, New York, 1956).
14. Educational Testing Service, 〈 http://www.ets.org 〉.
15. G. Z. Wilder and K. Powell, " Sex differences in test performance: A survey of the literature.," College Board Report 89-3 Sex Differences in Test Performance: A Survey of the Literature (College Entrance Examination Board, New York, 1989).
16. N. Cole, The ETS Gender Study: How Females and Males Perform in Educational Settings (Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, 1997).
17. R. Thornton and D. Sokoloff, " Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula.," Am. J. Phys. 0002-9505 66, 338-352 (1998). 10.1119/1.18863 (Pubitemid 128451986)
18. S. J. Pollock, N. D. Finkelstein, and L. E. Kost, " Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom: How sufficient is interactive engagement?," Phys. Rev. ST: Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010107-010110 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010107 0002-9505
19. M. Lorenzo, C. H. Crouch, and E. Mazur, " Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom.," Am. J. Phys. 0002-9505 74, 118-122 (2006). 10.1119/1.2162549
20. L. McCullough, " Gender, context, and physics assessment.," J. Int. Women's Studies 5, 20-30 (2004). (Pubitemid 40659765)
21. Summary data for April/August 2005 MCAT, 〈 http://www.aamc.org/ students/mcat/examineedata/pubs.htm 〉.
22. Summary data for April/August 1991 MCAT, 〈 http://www.aamc.org/ students/mcat/examineedata/pubs.htm 〉.
23. D. Ritter, " Gender role orientation and performance of stereotypically feminine and masculine cognitive tasks.," Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 50, 583-591 (2004). 10.1023/B:SERS.0000023077.91248.f7 0360-0025 (Pubitemid 39038743)
24. G. E. Francis, J. P. Adams, and E. J. Noonan, " Do they stay fixed?," Phys. Teach. 0031-921X 36, 488-490 (1998). 10.1119/1.879933
25. E. Brogt, D. Sabers, E. E. Prather, G. L. Deming, B. Hufnagel, and T. F. Slater, " Analysis of the astronomy diagnostic test.," Astron. Educ. Rev. 1539-1515 6, 25-42 (2007). 10.3847/AER2007003
26. M. Zeilik and V. J. Morris, " An examination of misconceptions in an astronomy course for science, mathematics, and engineering majors.," Astron. Educ. Rev. 1539-1515 2, 101-119 (2003). 10.3847/AER2003005
27. R. R. Hake, " Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization.," online at http://www.physics. indiana.edu/~hake/PERC2002h-Hake.pdf.
28. See EPAPS Document No. E-AJPIAS-74-003603 for average gains calculated from Ref.. For more information on EPAPS, see http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps. html.
29. The BCI was unavailable at the start of this study and also has a heavy emphasis on genetics and evolution that did not match well with the course content of the biology course examined in this study.
30. R. M. Kaplan and D. P. Saccuzzo, Psychological Testing: Principles, Application and Issues (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 1997).
31. D. Hestenes and I. Halloun, " Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory.," Phys. Teach. 0031-921X 33, 502-506 (1995). 10.1119/1.2344278
32. Individual student's pretest scores, post-test scores, and gender were linked for both courses, and identifying information was removed from the data set prior to analysis. The study in both courses was performed with the review and approval of the Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects at MSU.
33. L. Turnquist, P. Vatria, and Y. Vartia, " How should relative changes be measured?," Am. Stat. 0003-1305 39, 43-46 (1985). 10.2307/2683905
34. L. Bao, " Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations.," Am. J. Phys. 0002-9505 74, 917-922 (2006). 10.1119/1.2213632
35. J. D. Marx and K. Cummings, " Normalized change.," Am. J. Phys. 0002-9505 75, 87-91 (2007). 10.1119/1.2372468
36. I. Halloun and D. Hestenes, " Common sense concepts about motion.," Am. J. Phys. 0002-9505 53, 1056-1065 (1985). 10.1119/1.14031
37. C. M. Steele, S. J. Spencer, and J. Aronson, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by, M. Zanna, (Academic, New York, 2002), p. 379.
38. G. A. Kenney-Benson, E. M. Pomerantz, A. M. Ryan, and H. Patrick, " Sex differences in math performance: The role of children's approach to schoolwork.," Dev. Psychol. 0012-1649 42, 11-26 (2006). 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.11
39. Gender Gaps: Where Schools Still Fail our Cjildren (American Association of University Women Educational Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1998).
40. E. M. Pomerantz, E. R. Altermatt, and J. L. Saxon, " Making the grade but feeling distressed: Gender difference in academic performance and internal distress.," J. Educ. Psychol. 0022-0663 94, 396-404 (2002). 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.396
41. " The nation's report card: Mathematics highlights 2004.," Report No. NCES2004-451, 2004.
42. C. S. Smith and L. Hung, " Stereotype threat: Effects on education.," Soc. Psychol. Educ. 11, 243-257 (2008). 10.1007/s11218-008- 9053-3 1381-2890
43. B. Hufnagel, G. Deming, J. Landato, and A. Hodari, " The effect of stereotype threat on undergraduates in an introductory astronomy class.," J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng. 10, 89-98 (2004). 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v10.i1. 70 1072-8325