Gender, context, and physics assessment

Journal of International Women's Studies

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 20-30

  McCullough, Laura ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Assessment; Context; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 18544372117     PISSN: 15398706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. AAUW (1995). How Schools Shortchange Girls. New York: Marlowe & Co.
2. AAUW (1999). Gender Gaps. New York: Marlowe & Co.
3. Bazler, J. and D. Simonis. (1990). Are women out of the picture? Sex discrimination in science texts. Science Teacher 57(9): 24-26.
4. Benbow, C. P. and J. Stanley (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science 210: 1262-1264.
5. Bleier, R. (1986). Feminist Approaches to Science. New York: Pergamon Press.
6. Buck, G., I. Kostin, et al. (2002). Examining the relationship of content to gender-based performance differences in advanced placement exams. New York, College Board/ETS. Report #2002-12.
7. Cohn, C. (1996). Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. In Gender and Scientific Authority, Laslett, B., S. G. Kohlstedt, et. al. (Eds). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 183-214.
8. Cole, N. (1997). The ETS Gender Study. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
9. Enderstein, L.G. & P.E. Spargo (1998). The effect of context, culture and learning on the selection of alternative options in similar situations by South African pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6): 711-736.
10. Force Concept Inventory available on the Internet at http://modeling.asu. edu/R&E/Research.html
11. Gleaves, K. (1994). Urban African-American students' perceptions of school and tests: Re-examining the cultural bias theme. International Journal of Educational Reform, 3(2), 194-201.
12. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66: 64-74.
13. Hall, C. & N. Davis. (1999). Gender and racial differences in mathematical performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 139(6), 677-689.
14. Hestenes, D., M. Wells & G. Swackhamer (1992). A Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30: 141-151.
15. Ivie, R., R. Czujko & K. Stowe (2001). Women Physicists Speak: The 2001 International Study of Women in Physics. AIP Report, http://www.aip.org/ statistics
16. Ivie, R. & K. Stowe (2000). Women in Physics, 2000, AIP report R-430. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics.
17. McCullough, L. (1996). Gender differences in multiple-choice conceptual tests. Paper presented at the national meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers. College Park, MD. Available at http://physics.uwstout.edu/ staff/mccullough/physicseduc.htm.
18. McCullough, L. (2001). A gender context for the Force Concept Inventory, Paper presented at the national meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers. San Diego, CA. Available at http://physics.uwstout.edu/staff/ mccullough/physicseduc.htm.
19. McCullough, L. & C.H. Crouch (2002). Gender, Educational Reform, and Instructional Assessment, Part 1. Paper presented at the national meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers. Philadelphia, PA. Available at http://physics.uwstout.edu/staff/mccullough/physicseduc.htm.
20. Middlecamp, C. and B. Subramaniam (1999). What is feminist pedagogy? Useful ideas for teaching chemistry. J. of Chem. Ed. 76(4): 520-524.
21. Middlecamp, C. and A.-M. Nickel (2000). Doing science and asking questions: An interactive exercise. J. of Chem. Ed. 77(1): 50-52.
22. National Science Foundation (2002). Division of Science Resources Statistics; Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966-2000. NSF report 02-327. Arlington, VA: NSF. Author: Susan T. Hill, http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf02327/ start.htm
23. Navarro, C. (1989). Why do women have lower average SAT-Math scores than men? Paper presented at American Educational Research Association meeting, San Francisco, CA.
24. Nelson, D. and D. Rogers. (2004). A National Analysis of Diversity in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities. Research Report, University of Oklahoma. Available at http://www.now.org/issues/diverse/ diversity_report.pdf
25. Neuschatz, M. and M. McFarling. (2003). Broadening the Base: High School Physics Education at the Turn of a New Century. AIP Report R-439. Available at http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/hsreport2003.pdf
26. Potter, E. and S. Rosser (1992). Factors in life science textbooks that may deter girls' interest in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(7): 669-686.
27. Rennie, L. & L. Parker (1993). Assessment in physics: Further exploration of the implications of item context. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 39(4): 28-32.
28. Rennie, L. & L. Parker (1996). Placing physics problems in real-life context: Students' reactions and performance. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(1): 55-59.
29. Rennie, L. and L. Parker (1998). Equitable measurement of achievement in physics: High school students' responses to assessment tasks in different formats and contexts. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 4(2): 113-127.
30. Rosser, S. (1986). Teaching Science and Health from a Feminist Perspective. New York: Pergamon Press.
31. Rosser, S. (1990). Female Friendly Science: Applying Women's Studies Methods and Theories to Attract Students, New York: Pergamon Press.
32. Seymour, E. and N. Hewitt (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33. Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has Feminism Changed Science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6): 613-629.
35. This wasn't supposed to happen: The Black-White SAT gap is actually growing larger. 1999. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 25, p. 95-100.
36. U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. Mathematics and Science in the Eighth Grade: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, NCES Report 2000-014, Washington, DC, 2000.
37. Wertheim, M. (1995). Pythagoras' Trousers: God, Physics and the Gender Wars. New York: W. W. Norton.
38. Wilder, G. Z. and K. Powell (1989). Sex Differences in Test Performance: A Survey of the Literature. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.