Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: An assessment of Italian founders' incentives

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 380-402

  Fini, Riccardo ^a   Grimaldi, Rosa ^a   Sobrero, Maurizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Academic spin off; Founders' incentives; Technology transfer

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC SPIN-OFF; COMMERCIAL EXPLOITATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ENTREPRENEURIAL ATTITUDE; FOUNDERS' INCENTIVES; NEW VENTURE CREATION; ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS; UNIVERSITY RESEARCHERS;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EDUCATION;

EID: 67349167004     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-008-9093-z     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. AUTM. (2006). Licensing activity survey. AUTM.
2. Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (1995). Flexible recycling and high technology entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 37(3), 62-89.
3. Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35 (4), 518-532. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.004.
4. Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333-354. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-0206-5.
5. Beck, T., Demirg-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to firm growth: Does size matter? Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137-151. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00727.x.
6. Campbell, C. A. (1992). A decision theory model for entrepreneurial acts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17, 21-27.
7. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Elde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 183-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.004.
8. Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N., & Sampat, B. N. (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48(1), 61-72. doi: 10.1287/ mnsc.48.1.61.14272.
9. Cukor, P. (1992). How GTE laboratories evaluates its university collaborations. Research Technology Management, 35(2), 31-37.
10. Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D., & Coombs, J. E. (1998). Firm-specific resources and wealth creation in high-technology ventures: Evidence from newly public biotechnology firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(3), 55-73.
11. Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more spin-offs than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209-220. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5.
12. Eurostat. (2005). European Commission website, Long term indicators for regions and cities. http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm.
13. Feldman, M. (1999). The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 5-26. doi: 10.1080/10438599900000002.
14. Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861-875. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.861.
15. Feldman, M. P., & Desrochers, P. (2003). Research universities and local economic development: Lessons from the history of Johns Hopkins University. Industry and Innovation, 10, 5-24. doi: 10.1080/ 1366271032000068078.
16. Foo, M. D., Wong, P. K., & Ong, A. (2005). Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges' evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 385-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.04.001.
17. Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30. doi: 10.1023/A:1021674618658.
18. Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams: A study of Italian academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 329-341. doi: 10.1023/A:1026171206062.
19. Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). Academic organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 821-845. doi: 10.1016/ j.jbusvent.2004.07.002.
20. Grimaldi, R., & Nosella, A. (2008, Forthcoming). University level mechanisms supporting the creation of new companies: An analysis of Italian academic spin-offs. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management.
21. Guy, K., & Quintas, P. (1995). Collaborative, pre-competitive R&D and the firm. Research Policy, 24, 325-348. doi: 10.1016/ 0048-7333(93)00769-P.
22. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (Eds.). (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
23. Hsu, D., & Bernstein, T. (1997). Managing the university technology licensing process. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 9, 1-33.
24. Istituto nazionale di statistica (Istat). (2003). Report Asse III, Indicatori QCS 2000-2006. http://www.istat.it/cerca/ricerca_DB.html.
25. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge: Spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-597. doi: 10.2307/2118401.
26. Jain, S., & George, G. (2007). Technology transfer offices and institutional entrepreneurs: The case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human embryonic stem cells. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 535-568. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm017.
27. Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240-259.
28. Lerner, J. (1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72(3), 285-318. doi: 10.1086/209616.
29. Lerner, J. (2005). The university and the start-up: Lessons from the past two decades. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2), 49-58. doi: 10.1007/s10961-004-4357-8.
30. Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981-993. doi: 10.1016/ j.respol.2005.05.010.
31. Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of universities spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043-1057. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006.
32. Louis, K. S., Jones, L. M., Anderson, M. S., Blumenthal, D., & Campbell, E. G. (2001). Entrepreneurship, secrecy and productivity: A comparison of clinical and non-clinical faculty. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 233-245. doi: 10.1023/A:1011106006976.
33. Lowe, R. (2002). Invention, innovation and entrepreneurship: The commercialization of University research by inventor founded firms. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
34. Mansfield, E., & Lee, J. Y. (1996). The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, 25(7), 1047-1058. doi: 10.1016/ S0048-7333(96)00893-1.
35. Matkin, G. (Ed.). (1990). Technology transfer and the university. New York: Macmillan.
36. McQueen, D., & Wallmark, J. (1991). University technical innovation: Spin-offs and patents in Goteborg, Sweden. In A. Brett, D. Gibson, & R. Smilor (Eds.), University spin-off companies (pp. 103-115). Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
37. Mian, S. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy, 25(3), 325-335. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00828-4.
38. Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B., & Ziedonis, A. (2001). The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on US academic research and technology transfer. Research Policy, 30(1), 99-119. doi: 10.1016/ S0048-7333(99)00100-6.
39. Mustar, P. (1997). Spin-off enterprises. How French academics create high-tech companies: Conditions for success or failure. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 37-43.
40. Mustar, P., & Laredo, P. (2002). Innovation and research policy in France (1980-2000) or the disappearance of the Colbertist State. Research Policy, 31(1), 55-72. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00107-X.
41. Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., Wright, M., Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35 (2), 289-308. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.11.001.
42. Niosi, J., & Bas, T. G. (2001). The competencies of regions: Canada's clusters in biotechnology. Small Business Economics, 17 (1-2), 31-42. doi: 10.1023/A:1011114220694.
43. Olofsson, C., & Wahlbin, C. (1992). Firms started by university researchers in Sweden - roots, roles, relations, growth patterns. In N. Churchill, S. Birley, W. Bygrave, D. Muzyka, C. Wahlbin, & W. Wetzel (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 610-620). Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
44. O'Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spin-off performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011.
45. O'Shea, R., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O'Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00454.x.
46. Piccaluga, A., & Balderi, C. (2007). Consistenza ed evoluzione delle imprese spin-off della ricerca pubblica in Italia. Report Finlombarda.
47. Piva, E., & Colombo, M. (2005). Academic start-ups and new technology-based firms: A matched pair comparison. Paper presented at the Triple Helix Conference, Turin, Italy.
48. Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7-8), 879.
49. Roberts, E., & Wainer, H. (1971). Some characteristics of technical entrepreneurship. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 18(3), 100-109.
50. Roberts, E. B. (Ed.). (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Roberts, E. B., & Malone, D. E. (1996). Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations. R & D Management, 26(1), 17-46. doi: 10.1111/ j.1467-9310.1996.tb00927.x.
52. Samson, K. J., & Gurdon, M. A. (1993). University scientists as entrepreneurs: A special case of technology transfer and high technology venturing. Technovation, 13(2), 63-71. doi: 10.1016/0166-4972(93)90054-Y.
53. Shane, S. (2001). Technology opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47(2), 205-225. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837.
54. Shane, S. (Ed.). (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spin-off and wealth creation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
55. Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48, 364-381. doi: 10.1287/ mnsc.48.3.364.7731.
56. Stuart, R., & Abetti, P. A. (1987). Start-up ventures: Towards the prediction of initial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 215-230. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(87)90010-3.
57. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (Eds.). (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
58. Thursby, J., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major US universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 59-72. doi: 10.1023/A:1007884111883.
59. Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. C. (2003). Are faculty critical? Their role in university-industry licensing. NBER working paper No.W9991. Emory Economics, Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=450892.
60. Torero, M., Darby, M., & Zucker, L. (2001). The importance of intellectual human capital in the birth of the semiconductor industry. Working paper. UCLA Anderson School of Business.
61. Tornatzky, L. G., Waugaman, P. G., & Bauman, J. (1997). Benchmarking university industry technology transfer in the south: 1995-1996 data. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.
62. Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the growth in university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147-175. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0.
63. Von Zedtwiz, M., & Grimaldi, R. (2006). Key success factors of incubator business models: Results of an empirical investigation in Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 459-468.
64. Watson, W. E., Ponthieu, L. D., & Critelli, J. W. (1995). Team interpersonal process effectiveness in venture partnerships and its connections to perceived success. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(5), 393-412. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(95)00036-8.
65. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
66. Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Brewer, M. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 290-306.