Quantitative strategies to fuel the merger of discovery and hypothesis-driven shotgun proteomics

Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 114-125

  Kline, Kelli G ^a   Finney, Greg L ^b   Wu, Christine C ^c  

^a Wu Laboratory

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomarker discovery; Human tissue; Quantitative shotgun proteomics; Targeted mass spectrometry

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; ISOTOPE LABELING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; ISOTOPES; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MYOCARDIUM; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

PROXYS;

EID: 65549129509     PISSN: 14739550     EISSN: 14774062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elp008     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. McCormack AL, Schieltz DM, Goode B, et al. Direct analysis and identification of proteins in mixtum-by LC/MS/MS and database searching at the low-femtomole level. Anal Chem 1997;69:767-76.
2. Link AJ, Eng J, Schieltz DM, et al. Direct analysis of protein complexes using inass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol 1999;17: 676-82.
3. Peng J, Gygi SP. Proteomics the move to mixtures. J Mass Spectrom 2001;36:1083-91.
4. Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR, 3rd. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein Identification technology. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19:242-7.
5. Gao J, Friedrichs MS, Dongre AR, Opiteck GJ. Guidelines for the routine application of the peatide, hits technique. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2005:16:1231-8.
6. Liu H, Sadygov KG, Yates JK, 3rd. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2004;76:4193-201.
7. Zybailov B, Coleman MK, Florens L, Washburn MP. Correlation of relative abundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling. Anal Chem 2005;77:6218-24.
8. Zybailov B, Mosley AL, Sardiu ME, et al. Statistical analysis of Membrane proteome expression changes in Saaharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 2006;52339-47.
9. Braisted JC, Kuntumalla S, Vogel C, et al. The APEX Quantitative Proteomics Tool: Generating protein quantitation estimates eforn LC-MS/ MS proteomics results. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:529.
10. Gilchrist A, Au CE, Hiding J, et al. Quantitative Proteomics analysis of the secretoty pathway. Cell 2006;127:1265-81.
11. Carvalho PC, Hewel J, Barbosa VC, Yates JR, 3rd. identifying differences in protein expression Ievels by spectral counting and feature selection. Genet Mol Res 2008;7: 342-56.
12. Kline KG, Frewen B, Bristow MR, et al. High quality catalog of proteotypic peptides from human heart. J Proteome Res 2008:7 5055-61.
13. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchinarova I, et al. Stable isotope labeling by ainino acids in cell Culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002:1 376-86.
14. Wu CC, MacCoss MJ, Howell KE. et al. Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes 6or quantitative proteomic analysis. A Chem 2004;76:4951-9.
15. Oda Y. Huang K, Cross FR. et al. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad Sci USA 1999:96:6591-6.
16. Chen X. Sun L. Yu Y, et al. Amino acid-coded tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics 2007;424-37.
17. Cagney G. Emili A. De novo peptide sequencing and quantitative profiling of complex protein mixtures using mass-coded abundance tagging. Nat Biotechnol 2002:20:163-70.
18. Conrads TP. Alving K. Veenstra TD. et al. Quantitative analysis of bacterial and mammalian proteomics using a combination of cysteine affinity tags and 15N-metabolic labeling. Anal Chem 2001;73 2132-9.
19. Gygi SP, Rist B. Gerber SA, et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 1999:17:994-9.
20. Yao X, Freas A. Ramirez J. et al. Proteolytic 18O labelling for comparative proteomics: Model studies with two sero-types of adenovirus. Anal Chem 2001;73:2836-42.
21. Smolka MB. Zhou H. Purkayastha S. Aebersold R. Optimization of the isotope-coded affinity tag-labeling procedure for quantitative proteome analysis. Anal Biochem 2001;297:25-31.
22. Choe L. D'Ascenzo M, Relkin NR, et al. 8-plex quantitation of changes in cerebrospinal fluid protein expression in subjects undergoing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Proteomics 2007;7:3651-60.
23. Ross PL. Huang YN. Marchese JN, et al. Multiplexed proten quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004;3:1154-69.
24. Bantscheff M. Eberhard D. Abraham Y, et al. Quantitative chemical proteomics reveals mechanisms of action of clinical ABL kinase inhibitors. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:1035-44.
25. Andreev VP. Li L. Cao L, et al. A new algorithm using cross-assignment for label-free quantitation with LC-LTQ-FT MS. J Proteome Res 2007;6:2186-94.
26. Cox J, Man M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:1367-72.
27. Fang R, Elias Da. Monroe ME, et al. Differential label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of Shewanella oneidensis cultured under aerobic and suboxic conditions by accurate mass and time tag approach. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006;5: 714-25.
28. Jaff JD, Mani DR, Leptos KG, et al. PEPPeR, A platform for experimental proteomic pattern recognition. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006;5:1927-41.
29. Mueller LN, Rinner O, Schmidt A, et al. SuperHim - a novel tool for high resolution LC-MS-based peptide/protein profiling. Proteomics 2007;7:3470-80.
30. Wiener MC, Sachs JR, Deyanova EG, Yates NA. Differential mass spectrometry: A label-free LC-MS method for finding significant differences in complex peptide and protein mixtures. Anal Chem 2004:76:6085-96.
31. Smith CA, Wam EJ, O'Maille G, et al. XCMS: Processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite protiling using non-linear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal Chem 2006;78 779-87.
32. America AH, Cordewener JH, van Geffen MH, et al. Alignment and statistical difference analysis of complex peptide data sets generated by multidimensional LC-MS. Proteomics 2006:6:641-53.
33. Finney GL, Blackler AR, Hoopmann MR, et al. Label-free comparative analysis of proteomics mixtures using chromatographic alignment of high-resolution muLC-MS data. Anal Chem 2008:80:961-71.
34. Listgarten J, Neal RM, Roweis ST, et al. Difference detection in LC-MS data for protein biomarker discover Bioinformatics 2007: 23:e198-204.
35. Prakash A, Mallick P, Whiteaker J, et al. Signal maps for mass spectrometry-based comparative proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006:5:423-32.
36. Prince JT, Marcotte EM. Chromatographic alignment of ESI-LC-MS proteomics data sets by ordered bijective interpolated warping. Anal Chem 2006:78:6140-52.
37. Lange E, Gropi C, Schulz-Trieglaff O, et al. A geometric approach for the alignment of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics 2007:23:i273-81.
38. Fischer B, Grossmann J, Roch V, et al. Semi-supervised LC/MS alignment for differential proteomics. Bioinformatics 2006:22 e132-40.
39. Callister SJ, Barry RC, Adkins JN, et al. Normalization approaches for removing systematic-biases associated with mass spectrometry and label-free proteomics. J Proteome Res 2006;5:277-86.
40. Wang P, Tang H, Zhang H, et al. Normalization regarding non-random missing values in high-throughput mass spectrometry data. Pac Symp Biocomput 2006;315-26.
41. Nie L, Wu G, Zhang W. Statistics application and challenges in global get-free proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2008;28:297-307.
42. Wong JW, Sullivan MJ, Cagney G. Computational methods for the comparative quantification of proteins in label-free LCu-MS experiments. Brief Bioinform 2008;9:156-65.
43. Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR, Aebersold R. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J Proteome Res 2008;7:51-61.
44. Vandenbogaert M, Li-Thiao-Te S, Kaltenbach HM, et al. Alignment of LC-MS images, with applications to biomarker discovery and protein identification. Proteomics 2008;8: 650-72.
45. Schmidt A, Gehlenborg N, Bodenmiller B, et al. An integrated, directed mass spectrometric approach for in-depth characterization of complex peptide mixtures. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008;7:2138-50.
46. Anderson MA, Wachs T, Henion JD. Quantitative ionspray liquid chromatographic/tandem mass spectrometric determination of reserpine in equine plasma. J Mass Spectrom 1997;32:152-8.
47. Barbarin N, Mawhinney DB, Black R, Henion J. High-throughput selected reaction monitoring liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry determination of methylphenidate and its major metabolite, ritalinic acid, in rat plasma employing monolithic columns. J Chromatogr B Analys Technol Biomed Life Sci 2003;783:73-83.
48. Borges V, Yang E, Dunn J, Henion J. High-throughput liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry determination of bupropion and its metabolites in human, mouse and rat plasma using a monolithic column. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2004; 804 277-87.
49. Steinborner S, Henion J. Liquid-liquid extraction in the 96-well plate fomat with SRM LC/MS quantitative determining of methotrexate and its major metabolite in human plasma. Anal Chem 1999;71:2340-5.
50. Yang L. Amad M, Winnik WM. et al. Investigation of an enhanced resolution triple quadrupole mass spectrometer for high-throughput liquid chromatography.tandem mass spectrometry assays. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2002; 16
51. Jemal M, Ouyang Z. Enhanced relotiuon triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry for itd quantitative bioanalysis using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry: Investigation of parameters that affect ruggedness, Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2003;17 24-38.
52. Onorato JM, Henion JD, Lefebvre PM, Kiplinger JP. Selected reaction monitoring LC-MS determination of idoxifelle and its pyrrolidione metabolite in human plasma using robotic high-throuput. sequential sample injection. Anal Chem 2001; 73: 119-25.
53. Zweigenbaum J. Henion J. Bioanalytic high-throughput selected reaction monitoring-LC/MS determinationa of selected estrogen receptor modulators in human plasma.
54. Chen YL, Hanson GD, Jiang X, Naidong W. Simultaneous determination of hydrocodone and hydromorphone in human plasma by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogr B Analyt Techol Biomed Life Sci 2002;769: 35-64.
55. Zhang H, Henion J. Quantitative and qualitative determination estrogen sulfates in human urine by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry using 96-well technology. Anal Chem 1999:71 3955-64.
56. Thomas A, Sigmund G, Guddat S, et al. Determination of selected stimulants in urine for sports drug anaysis by solid phase extraction via cation exchange and means of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Eur J Mass Spectrom 2008;14135-43.
57. Kirkpatrick DS, Gerber SA, Gygi SP. The absolue quantification strategy: a general procedure for the quantification of proteins and pst-translational modifications Methods 2005;35:265-73.
58. Arnott D. Kishiyama A, Luis EA, et al. Selective detection of membrane proteins without antibodies: A mass spectrometric version of the western blot. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002;1:148-56.
59. Barnidge DR, Dratz EA, Martin T. et al. Absolute quantification of the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin by LC/MS/MS using proteolysis product peptides and synthetic peptide standards Anal Chem 2003; 75:445-51.
60. Barnidge DR. Goodmanson MK. Klee-GG. Muddiman DC. Absolute quantification of the model biomarkers prostate-specific antigen in serum by LC-Ms/MS using protein cleavage and isotope dilution mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2004;3644-52.
61. Anderson NL. Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: History. character and diagnostic prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004;1:845-67.
62. Domon B. Acbersold R. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 2006;312:212-17.
63. Taylor RL. Grebe SK, Singh RJ. Quantitative, hihgly sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods for detection of synthetic corticosteroids. Clin Chem 2004;50:2345-52.
64. Gerber SA. Rush J. Stemman O. et al. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci USA 2003;100: 6940-5.
65. Bowers GN. Jr. Fassett JD, White ET. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry and the national reference system. Anal Chem 1993;65:475R-9R.
66. Schaeffer R, Fodor P. Soeroes C. Development of a liquid chromatography electrospray selected reaction monitoring methods for the determination of organoarsenic species in marine and freshwater samples. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2006;20:2979-89.
67. Botitsi E. Frosyni C. Tsipi D. Determination of pharmaceuticals from different therapeutics classes in wastewaters by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2007;387:1317-27.