Binding Hot Spots in the TEM1-BLIP Interface in Light of its Modular Architecture

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 365, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 663-679

  Reichmann, D ^a   Cohen, M ^a   Abramovich, R ^a   Dym, O ^a   Lim, D ^b   Strynadka, N C J ^b   Schreiber, G ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

energetics; hot spots; protein protein interaction; structure function; X ray

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; BETA LACTAMASE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CELL CYCLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPLEX FORMATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; ENERGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE MUTATION; KINETICS; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

EID: 33845661569     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.09.076     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Clackson T., and Wells J.A. A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 267 (1995) 383-386
2. Bogan A.A., and Thorn K.S. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 280 (1998) 1-9
3. Nooren I.M., and Thornton J.M. Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 325 (2003) 991-1018
4. Guerois R., Nielsen J.E., and Serrano L. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 320 (2002) 369-387
5. Kortemme T., and Baker D. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 14116-14121
6. Horovitz A. Double-mutant cycles: a powerful tool for analyzing protein structure and function. Fold. Des. 1 (1996) R121-R126
7. Lo Conte L., Chothia C., and Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285 (1999) 2177-2198
8. Hu Z., Ma B., Wolfson H., and Nussinov R. Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 39 (2000) 331-342
9. Pokala N., and Handel T.M. Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 347 (2005) 203-227
10. Reichmann D., Rahat O., Albeck S., Meged R., Dym O., and Schreiber G. The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 57-62
11. Fisher E. Einflus der configuration auf die wirkung derenzyme. Ber. Dt. Chem. Ges 27 (1894) 751
12. Koshland D.E. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 44 (1958) 98-104
13. Brinda K.V., Kannan N., and Vishveshwara S. Analysis of homodimeric protein interfaces by graph-spectral methods. Protein Eng. 15 (2002) 265-277
14. Bahar I., Atilgan A.R., and Erman B. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold. Des. 2 (1997) 173-181
15. Vendruscolo M., Paci E., Dobson C.M., and Karplus M. Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state. Nature 409 (2001) 641-645
16. Sobolev V., Sorokine A., Prilusky J., Abola E.E., and Edelman M. Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics 15 (1999) 327-332
17. Amitai G., Shemesh A., Sitbon E., Shklar M., Netanely D., Venger I., and Pietrokovski S. Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J. Mol. Biol. 344 (2004) 1135-1146
18. Swint-Kruse L. Using networks to identify fine structural differences between functionally distinct protein states. Biochemistry 43 (2004) 10886-10895
19. Albeck S., Unger R., and Schreiber G. Evaluation of direct and cooperative contributions towards the strength of buried hydrogen bonds and salt bridges. J. Mol. Biol. 298 (2000) 503-520
20. Schuck P. Reliable determination of binding affinity and kinetics using surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 8 (1997) 498-502
21. Homola J. Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 377 (2003) 528-539
22. Myszka D.G. Kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic analysis of macromolecular interactions with BIACORE. Methods Enzymol. 323 (2000) 325-340
23. Selzer T., Albeck S., and Schreiber G. Rational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexes. Nature Struct. Biol. 7 (2000) 537-541
24. Zhang Z., and Palzkill T. Dissecting the protein-protein interface between beta-lactamase inhibitory protein and class A beta-lactamases. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 42860-42866
25. Albeck S., and Schreiber G. Biophysical characterization of the interaction of the beta-lactamase TEM-1 with its protein inhibitor BLIP. Biochemistry 38 (1999) 11-21
26. Moza B., Buonpane R.A., Zhu P., Herfst C.A., Rahman A.K., McCormick J.K., et al. Long-range cooperative binding effects in a T cell receptor variable domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 9867-9872
27. Reynolds K.A., Thomson J.M., Corbett K.D., Bethel C.R., Berger J.M., Kirsch J.F., et al. Structural and computational characterization of the SHV-1 beta -lactamase/beta -lactamase inhibitor protein(BLIP) interface. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 26745-26753
28. Rohl C.A., Strauss C.E., Misura K.M., and Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 383 (2004) 66-93
29. Eyal E., Najmanovich R., McConkey B.J., Edelman M., and Sobolev V. Importance of solvent accessibility and contact surfaces in modeling side-chain conformations in proteins. J. Comput. Chem. 25 (2004) 712-724
30. Tetreault M., Cusanovich M., Meyer T., Axelrod H., and Okamura M.Y. Double mutant studies identify electrostatic interactions that are important for docking cytochrome c2 onto the bacterial reaction center. Biochemistry 41 (2002) 5807-5815
31. Lim D., Park H.U., De Castro L., Kang S.G., Lee H.S., Jensen S., et al. Crystal structure and kinetic analysis of beta-lactamase inhibitor protein-II in complex with TEM-1 beta-lactamase. Nature Struct. Biol. 8 (2001) 848-852
32. Thai W., Paradkar A.S., and Jensen S.E. Construction and analysis of ss-lactamase-inhibitory protein (BLIP) non-producer mutants of Streptomyces clavuligerus. Microbiology 147 (2001) 325-335
33. Kunkel T.A., Roberts J.D., and Zakour R.A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 154 (1987) 367-382
34. Sidhu S.S., Lowman H.B., Cunningham B.C., and Wells J.A. Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides. Methods Enzymol. 328 (2000) 333-363
35. Slutzki M., Jaitin D.A., Ben Yehezkel T., and Schreiber G. Variations in the unstructured C-terminal tail of interferons contribute to differential receptor binding and biological activity. J. Mol. Biol. 360 (2006) 1019-1030
36. Carter P.J., Winter G., Wilkinson A.J., and Fersht A.R. The use of double mutants to detect structural changes in the active site of the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (Bacillus stearothermophilus). Cell 38 (1984) 835-840
37. Word J.M., Lovell S.C., Richardson J.S., and Richardson D.C. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J. Mol. Biol. 285 (1999) 1735-1747
38. Word J.M., Lovell S.C., LaBean T.H., Taylor H.C., Zalis M.E., Presley B.K., et al. Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms. J. Mol. Biol. 285 (1999) 1711-1733
39. Connolly M.L. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 221 (1983) 709-713
40. Babu M.M. NCI: a server to identify non-canonical interactions in protein structures. Nucl. Acids Res. 31 (2003) 3345-3348
41. Strynadka N.C., Jensen S.E., Johns K., Blanchard H., Page M., Matagne A., et al. Structural and kinetic characterization of a beta-lactamase-inhibitor protein. Nature 368 (1994) 657-660
42. Kortemme T., Kim D.E., and Baker D. Computational alanine scanning of protein-protein interfaces. Sci. STKE 2004 (2004) 12