Integrating alternative learning and assessment in a course of english for law students

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 155-166

  Burkšaitiene, Nijole ^a   Teresevičiene, Margarita ^b  

^a MYKOLAS ROMERIS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449239760     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930601125699     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Association for Higher Education (AAHE). 1992. Principles of good practice for assessing student learning. Washington, DC: AAHE.
2. Barfield, R.L. 2003. Students' perceptions of and satisfaction with group grades and the group experience in the college classroom. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28, no. 4: 355-69.
3. Baume, D. 2001. A briefing on assessment of portfolios, Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre Assessment Series, 6 York: LTSN Generic Centre.
4. Bjornavold, J. 2001. Making learning visible: identification, assessment and recognition of non-formal learning. European Journal of Vocational Training 22: 24-32.
5. Bourner, J., M. Hughes, and T. Bourner. 2001. First-year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26, no. 1: 19-33.
6. Davies, A., and P. LeMahieu. 2003. Assessment for learning: reconsidering portfolios and research evidence, innovation and change in professional education. In Optimising new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards, eds. M. Segers, F. Dochy, and E. Cascallar, 141-71. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
7. Dysthe, O., and K. Engelsen. 2004. Portfolios and assessment in teacher education in Norway: a theory-based discussion of different models in two sites. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29, no. 2: 239-57.
8. Frank, M., and A. Barzilai. 2004. Integrating alternative assessment in a project-based learning course for pre-service science and technology teachers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29, no. 1: 41-61.
9. Gibbs, G., and T. Habeshaw. 1997. Preparing to teach: an introduction to effective teaching in higher education, 2nd edn Melksham: Cromwell Press.
10. Gomez, E. 2000. Assessment portfolios: including English language learners in large-scale assessments, ERIC DIGESTS, ED447725 Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. http://www.ericfacility.net/ericdigests/.
11. Gupta, M.L. 2004. Enhancing student performance through cooperative learning in physical sciences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29, no. 1: 63-73.
12. Hamp-Lyons, L. 1996. Applying ethical standards to portfolio assessment of writing in English as a second language. In Studies in language testing, ed. M. Milanovic, 151-64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hancock, C.A. 1994. Alternative assessment and second language study: what and why?, ERIC DIGESTS Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. http://www.ericfacility.net/eric-digests/.
14. Hutchinson, T., and A. Waters. 1987. English for specific purposes: a learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kemp, J., and D. Toperoff. 1998. Guidelines for portfolio assessment in teaching English. http://www.etni.org.il/ministry/portfolio/default.html.
16. Klenowski, V. 2003. Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: processes and principles. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
17. Knapper, C.K., and A.J. Cropley. 2000. Lifelong learning in higher education, 3rd edn London: Kogan Page; Sterling, Stylus.
18. Lejk, M., and M. Wyvill. 2001. Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26, no. 1: 61-71.
19. Miller, P.J. 2003. The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28, no. 4: 383-94.
20. Moya, S.S., and J.M. O'Malley. 1994. A portfolio assessment model for ESL. Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students 48: 13-36.
21. Northledge, A. 2003. Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity. Teaching in Higher Education 8, no. 1: 17-32.
22. Parker, S. 1997. Reflective teaching in the postmodern world: a manifesto for education in postmodernity. Buckingham and Philadelphia: SRHE & Open University Press.
23. Powell, R. 1997. Law today. Harlow: Longman.
24. Prosser M., and K. Trigwell. 2001. Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education. Buckingham and Philadelphia: SRHE & Open University Press.
25. Ramsden, P. 1994. Learning to teach in higher education. London and New York: Routledge.
26. Rust, C., B. O'Donovan, and M. Price. 2005. A social constructivist assessment process model: how the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 3: 231-40.
27. Shapiro, D.F. 2003. Facilitating holistic curriculum development. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28, no. 4: 423-34.
28. Smith, K., and H. Tillema. 2003. Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28, no. 6: 625-47.
29. Woodward, H., and P. Nanlohy. 2004. Digital portfolios: fact or fashion? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29, no. 2: 227-37.