Fragment-based local statistical potentials derived by combining an alphabet of protein local structures with secondary structures and solvent accessibilities

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 820-836

  Li, Quan ^a   Zhou, Changhai ^a   Liu, Haiyan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Protein local structure; Sequence design; Solvent accessibility; Statistical potential

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; SOLVENT; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MARKOV CHAINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SOLVENTS;

EID: 61449129495     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22191     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Chen WW, Shakhnovich EI. Lessons from the design of a novel atomic potential for protein folding. Protein Sci 2005;14:1741-1752.
2. Sippl MJ. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-235.
3. Vendruscolo M, Najmanovich R, Domany E. Can a pairwise contact potential stabilize native protein folds against decoys obtained by threading? Proteins 2000;38:134-148.
4. Baldwin RL, Rose GD. Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding. Trends Biochem Sci 1999;24:26-33.
5. Tosatto SC, Battistutta R. TAP score: torsion angle propensity normalization applied to local protein structure evaluation. BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8:155.
6. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 1997;278:82-87.
7. Russ WP, Ranganathan R. Knowledge-based potential functions in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:447-452.
8. Shortle D. Composites of local structure propensities: evidence for local encoding of long-range structure. Protein Sci 2002;11:18-26.
9. Fang Q, Shortle D. Prediction of protein structure by emphasizing local side-chain/backbone interactions in ensembles of turn fragments. Proteins 2003;53 Suppl 6:486-490.
10. Solis AD, Rackovsky S. Improvement of statistical potentials and threading score functions using information maximization. Proteins 2006;62:892-908.
11. Betancourt MR, Skolnick J. Local propensities and statistical potentials of backbone dihedral angles in proteins. J Mol Biol 2004;342:635-649.
12. Keskin O, Yuret D, Gursoy A, Turkay M, Erman B. Relationships between amino acid sequence and backbone torsion angle preferences. Proteins 2004;55:992-998.
13. Ormeci L, Gursoy A, Tunca G, Erman B. Computational basis of knowledge-based conformational probabilities derived from localand long-range interactions in proteins. Proteins 2007;66:29-40.
14. Offmann B, Tyagi M, de Brevern AG. Local protein structures. Curr Bioinformatics 2007;2:165-202.
15. Bystroff C, Baker D. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J Mol Biol 1998;281:565-577.
16. Bystroff C, Baker D. Blind predictions of local protein structure in CASP2 targets using the I-sites library. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:167-171.
17. Bystroff C, Shao Y. Fully automated ab initio protein structure prediction using I-SITES, HMMSTR, and ROSETTA. Bioinformatics 2002;18; Suppl 1:S54-S61.
18. Yang AS, Wang LY. Local structure-based sequence profile database for local and global protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2002;18:1650-1657.
19. Yang AS, Wang LY. Local structure prediction with local structure-based sequence profiles. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1267-1274.
20. Benros C, de Brevern AG, Etchebest C, Hazout S. Assessing a novel approach for predicting local 3D protein structures from sequence. Proteins 2006;62:865-880.
21. Bystroff C, Thorsson V, Baker D. HMMSTR: a hidden Markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;301:173-190.
22. Camproux A-C, De Brevern A, Hazout S, Tufféry P. Exploring the use of a structural alphabet for a structural prediction of protein loops. Theor Chem Acc 2001;106:28-35.
23. Camproux AC, Gautier R, Tuffery P. A hidden Markov model derived structural alphabet for proteins. J Mol Biol 2004;339:591-605.
24. Camproux AC, Tuffery P. Hidden Markov model-derived structural alphabet for proteins: the learning of protein local shapes captures sequence specificity. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005;1724:394-403.
25. de Brevern AG, Etchebest C, Hazout S. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins 2000;41:271-287.
26. de Brevern AG, Valadie H, Hazout S, Etchebest C. Extension of a local backbone description using a structural alphabet: a new approach to the sequence-structure relationship. Protein Sci 2002;11:2871-2886.
27. de Brevern AG, Benros C, Gautier R, Valadie H, Hazout S, Etchebest C. Local backbone structure prediction of proteins. In Silico Biol 2004;4:381-386.
28. Etchebest C, Benros C, Hazout S, de Brevern AG. A structural alphabet for local protein structures: improved prediction methods. Proteins 2005;59:810-827.
29. Hunter CG, Subramaniam S. Protein fragment clustering and canonical local shapes. Proteins 2003;50:580-588.
30. Hunter CG, Subramaniam S. Protein local structure prediction from sequence. Proteins 2003;50:572-579.
31. Karchin R, Cline M, Karplus K. Evaluation of local structure alphabets based on residue burial. Proteins 2004;55:508-518.
32. Fetrow JS, Palumbo MJ, Berg G. Patterns, structures, and amino acid frequencies in structural building blocks, a protein secondary structure classification scheme. Proteins 1997;27:249-271.
33. Sander O, Sommer I, Lengauer T. Local protein structure prediction using discriminative models. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:14.
34. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
35. Eisenberg D, Bowie JU, Luthy R, Choe S. Three-dimensional profiles for analysing protein sequence-structure relationships. Faraday Discuss 1992:25-34.
36. Luthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 1992;356:83-85.
37. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 2001;310:243-257.
38. Topham CM, Srinivasan N, Blundell TL. Prediction of the stability of protein mutants based on structural environment-dependent amino acid substitution and propensity tables. Protein Eng 1997;10:7-21.
39. Wako H, Blundell TL. Use of amino acid environment-dependent substitution tables and conformational propensities in structure prediction from aligned sequences of homologous proteins. I. Solvent accessibility classes. J Mol Biol 1994;238:682-692.
40. Wako H, Blundell TL. Use of amino acid environment-dependent substitution tables and conformational propensities in structure prediction from aligned sequences of homologous proteins. II. Secondary structures J Mol Biol 1994;238:693-708.
41. Liu S, Zhang C, Liang S, Zhou Y. Fold recognition by concurrent use of solvent accessibility and residue depth. Proteins 2007;68:636-645.
42. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth-dependent structural alignment of fragments. Proteins 2005;58:321-328.
43. Dahiyat BI, Gordon DB, Mayo SL. Automated design of the surface positions of protein helices. Protein Sci 1997;6:1333-1337.
44. MacQueen JB. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1967. pp 281-297.
45. Noguchi T, Akiyama Y. PDB-REPRDB: a database of representative protein chains from the protein data bank (PDB) in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:492-493.
46. Frishman D, Argos P. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins 1995;23:566-579.
47. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971;55:379-400.
48. Henikoff J, Henikoff S. Using substitution probabilities to improve position-specific scoring matrices. Comput Appl Biosci 1996;12:135-143.
49. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:10915-10919.
50. Sadreyev RI, Grishin NV. Estimates of statistical significance for comparison of individual positions in multiple sequence alignments. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:106.
51. Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Sali A. Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles. Protein Sci 2004;13:1071-1087.
52. Sunyaev SR, Eisenhaber F, Rodchenkov IV, Eisenhaber B, Tumanyan VG, Kuznetsov EN. PSIC: profile extraction from sequence alignments with position-specific counts of independent observations. Protein Eng 1999;12:387-394.
53. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 1997;278:631-637.
54. Lawrence CE, Altschul SF, Boguski MS, Liu JS, Neuwald AF, Wootton JC. Detecting subtle sequence signals: a Gibbs sampling strategy for multiple alignment. Science 1993;262:208-214.
55. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
56. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Fidelis K, Rost B. A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment. Proteins 1999;34:220-223.
57. Pokala N, Handel TM. Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity. J Mol Biol 2005;347:203-227.
58. Dantas G, Kuhlman B, Callender D, Wong M, Baker D. A large scale test of computational protein design: folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2003;332:449-460.
59. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003;302:1364-1368.
60. Kuhlman B, Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10383-10388.
61. Liu Y, Kuhlman B. Rosetta Design server for protein design. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34 (Web Server issue):W235-W238.