Relationships between amino acid sequence and backbone torsion angle preferences

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 992-998

  Keskin, O ^a   Yuret, D ^a   Gursoy, A ^a   Turkay, M ^a   Erman, Burak ^a  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Interresidue correlations; Intraresidue correlations; Knowledge based potentials; Ramachandran map; Torsion angle correlations; Triplet

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CHYMOTRYPSIN INHIBITOR; CHYMOTRYPSIN INHIBITOR 2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ISOMER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALANINE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PEPTIDES; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 2542560465     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20100     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ramachandran GN, Ramakrishnan C, Sasisekharan V. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain conformations. J Mol Biol 1963;7: 95-99.
2. Ramakrishnan C, Ramachandran GN. Stereochemical criteria for polypeptide chain conformations. II. Allowed conformations for a pair of peptide units. Biophys J 1965;5:909-933.
3. Walther D, Cohen FE. Conformational attractors on the Ramachandran map. Acta Crystallogr D 1999;D55:506-517.
4. Kleywegt GJ, Jones TA. Phi/psi-chology: Ramachandran revisited. Structure 1996;4:1395-1400.
5. Gunasekaran K, Ramakrishnan C, Balaram P. Disallowed Ramachandran conformations of amino acid residues in protein structures. J Mol Biol 1996;264:191-198.
6. Pal D, Chakrabarti P. On residues in the disallowed region of the Ramachandran map. Biopolymers 2002;63:195-206.
7. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB, deBakker, PIW, Word JM, Prisant MG, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Structure validation by Ca geometry: φ,ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins 2003;50:437-450
8. Pappu RV, Srivanasan R, Rose GD. The Flory isolated-pair hypothesis is not valid for polypeptide chains: implications for protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:12565-12570.
9. Baldwin RL, Zimm BH. Are denatured proteins ever random coils? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:12391-12392.
10. Flory PJ. Statistical mechanics of chain molecules. New York: Wiley; 1969.
11. Mattice WL, Suter UW. Conformational theory of large molecules. The rotational isomeric state model in macromolecular systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1994.
12. Smith CK, Withka JM, Regan LA. Thermodynamic scale for the β-sheet forming tendencies of the amino-acids. Biochemistry 1994;33:5510-5517.
13. Smith LJ, Fiebig KM, Schwalbe H, Dobson CM. The concept of a random coil. Residual structure in peptides and denatured proteins. Fold Design 1996a;1:R95-R106.
14. Smith LJ, Bolin KA, Schwalbe H, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM, Dobson CM. Analysis of main chain torsion angles in proteins. Prediction of NMR coupling constants for native and denatured conformations. J Mol Biol 1996b;255:494-506.
15. Penkett CJ, Redfield C, Dodd I, Hubbard J, McBay DL, Mossakowska DE, Smith RAG, Dobson CM, Smith LJ. NMR analysis of main-chain conformational preferences in an unfolded fibronectin-binding protein. J Mol Biol 1997;274:152-159.
16. Minton AP. Excluded volume as a determinant of macromolecular structure. Biopolymers 1981;20:2093-2120.
17. Creighton TE. Proteins: structures and molecular properties, 2nd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1993.
18. Sippl M. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
19. Go N. Theoretical studies of protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 1983;12:183-210.
20. Lu H, Skolnick J. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 2001; 44:223-232.
21. Bahar I, Kaplan M, Jernigan RL. Short-range conformational energies, secondary structure propensities, and recognition of correct sequence-structure matches. Proteins 1997:29:292-308.
22. Bahar I, Jernigan RL. Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation. J Mol Biol 1997;266:195-214.
23. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Evaluation of short-range interactions as secondary structure energies for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 1999;36:347-356.
24. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Long- and short-range interactions in native protein structures are consistent/minimally frustrated in sequence space. Proteins 2003;50:35-43.
25. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258: 367-392.
26. Nishikawa K, Matsuo Y. Development of pseudoenergy potentials for assessing protein 3-D-1-D compatibility and detecting weak homologies. Protein Eng 1993;6:811-820.
27. Hobohm U, Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 1994;3:522-524.
28. Fiebig KM, Schwalbe H, Buck M, Smith LJ, Dobson CM. Towards a description of the conformation of denatured states of proteins. Comparison of a random coil model with NMR measurements. J Phys Chem 1996;100:2661-2666.
29. Serrano L. Comparison between the phi distribution of the amino acids in the protein database and NMR data indicates that amino acids have various phi propensities in the random coil conformation. J Mol Biol 1995;254:322-333.
30. O'Neil K, DeGrado WA. Thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids. Science 1990;250:246-250.
31. Horovitz A, Matthews JM, Fersht AR. α-Helix stability in proteins. II. Factors that influence stability at an internal position. J Mol Biol 1992;227:560-568.
32. Blaber M, Zhang X, Matthews BW. Structural basis of amino acid a-helix propensity. Science 1993;260:1637-1640.
33. Chakrabartty A, Kortemme T, Baldwin RL. Helix propensities of the amino acids measured in alanine-based peptides without helix-stabilizing sidechain interactions. Protein Sci 1994;3:843-852.
34. Munoz V, Serrano L. Intrinsic secondary structure propensities of the amino acids, using statistical phi-psi matrices: comparison with experimental scales. Proteins 1994;20:301-311.
35. Kim CA, Berg JM. Thermodynamic β-sheet propensities measured using a zinc-finger host peptide. Nature 1993;362:267-270.
36. Minor DL, Kim PS. Context is a major determinant of β-sheet propensity. Nature 1994;371:264-267.
37. Stites EW, Pranata J. Empirical evaluation of the influence of side-chains on the conformational entropy of the polypeptide backbone. Proteins 1995;22:132-140.
38. Han KF, Baker D. Global properties of the mapping between local amino acid sequence and local structure in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:5814-5818.