The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 247, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 371-375

  Oh, Jong Hyun ^a   Yoo, Chungkwon ^a   Kim, Yong Yeon ^a   Kim, Hyo Myung ^a   Song, Jong Suk ^a  

^a Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Corneal edema; Dynamic contour tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Intraocular pressure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORNEA EDEMA; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ABNORMALITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; TONOMETER;

ADULT; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; CORNEAL EDEMA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 59749092485     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0954-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barleon L, Hoffmann EM, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH (2006) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 142:583-590. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.05.030
2. Bovelle R, Kaufman SC, Thompson HW, Hamano H (1999) Corneal thickness measurements with the Topcon SP-2000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter. Arch Ophthalmol 117:868-870
3. Cho P, Cheung SW (2000) Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with the Topcon sepcular microscope SP-2000P. Curr Eye Res 21:799-807. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.21.4.799.5542
4. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: A review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367-408. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7
5. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 53:34-43
6. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, Chopra V, Pena F, Azen S et al (2007) Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology 114:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.047
7. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA et al (2002) The ocular hypertension treatment study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120:17-21
8. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Hali A, Lin C, Kam P, Ngyuen T (2007) The effect of contact lens induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements. J Glaucoma 16:153-158. doi: 10.1097/ 01.ijg.0000212277.95971.be
9. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Hua S, Yu F, Chung J, Hou Q (2007) The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in a mature population. Br J Ophthalmol 91:1636-1638. doi: 10.1136/ bjo.2007.118695
10. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Kao L, Pham N, Tran AQ (2008) The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and Goldmann tonometry. Optom Vis Sci 85:451-456. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181783a86
11. Herndon LW, Choudhri SA, Cox T, Damji KF, Shields MB, Allingham RR (1997) Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1137-1141
12. Kamppeter BA, Jonas JB (2005) Dynamic contour tornometry for intraocular pressure measurement. Am J Ophthalmol 140:318-320. doi: 10.1016/ j.ajo.2005.01.039
13. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 14:344-350. doi: 10.1097/ 01.ijg.0000176936.16015.4e
14. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2004) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3118-3121. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0018
15. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL (2004) Dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 122:1287-1293. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.9.1287
16. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL (2005) Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:359-366. doi: 10.1007/s00417-004-1024-6
17. Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee CN (2006) Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye 20:191-198. doi: 10.1038/ sj.eye.6701849
18. McMillan F, Forster RK (1975) Comparison of Mackay-Marg, Goldmann and Perkins tonometers in abnormal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol 93:420-424
19. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2007) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Ophthalmology 114:658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.065
20. Moses RA (1958) The Goldmann applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol 46:865-869
21. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: A comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:763-767. doi: 10.1007/ s00417-005-1124-y
22. Schneider E, Grehn F (2006) Intraocular pressure measurement - comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 15:2-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000196655.85460.d6
23. Simon G, Small RH, Ren Q, Parel JM (1993) Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Refract Corneal Surg 9:110-117
24. Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1-30. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(93)90053-A
25. Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) The effect of corncal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 11:592-596