The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and goldmann tonometry

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 451-456

  Hamilton, Kirsten E ^a   Pye, David C ^b   Kao, Lawrence ^b   Pham, Nhung ^b   Tran, An Quyen Nguyen ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Dynamic contour; Edema; Goldmann; Tonometry

Indexed keywords

BEFORE AND AFTER; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; DYNAMIC CONTOUR; EDEMA; EYE CONDITIONS; GOLDMANN; GOLDMANN TONOMETER; HEALTHY SUBJECTS; HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; INTRA OCULAR PRESSURE; LENS WEAR; ON DYNAMICS; PEARSON CORRELATION; PULSE AMPLITUDE; STUDENT POPULATIONS; T-TESTS; TONOMETRY; UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES;

CONTACT LENSES; COSINE TRANSFORMS; MERCURY (METAL); OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

DISCRETE COSINE TRANSFORMS;

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CORNEA EDEMA; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GOLDMANN TONOMETER; HUMAN; HYDRATION; HYPOXIA; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PASCAL DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDENT T TEST; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY; ADOLESCENT; CORNEA; HISTOLOGY; MANOMETRY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PULSE RATE; READING; RETINA BLOOD VESSEL; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTACT LENSES; CORNEA; CORNEAL EDEMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MANOMETRY; PULSE; READING; RETINAL VESSELS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 48549088682     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181783a86     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. [Applanation tonometry.] Ophthalmologica 1957;134:221-42. In: Ritch R, Caronia RM, eds. Classic Papers in Glaucoma. The Hague, Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 2000: 155-62.
2. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975;53:34-43.
3. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:592-6.
4. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:367-408.
5. Mark HH. Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1973;76:223-4.
6. Moses RA. The Goldmann applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol 1958;46:865-9.
7. Simon G, Small RH, Ren Q, Parel JM. Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Refract Corneal Surg 1993;9:110-17.
8. McMillan F, Forster RK. Comparison of MacKay-Marg, Goldmann, and Perkins tonometers in abnormal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol 1975; 93:420-4.
9. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Hali A, Lin C, Kam P, Ngyuen T. The effect of contact lens induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements. J Glaucoma 2007;16:153-8.
10. Hamilton K, Pye D, Hua S, Yu F, Chung J, Hou Q. The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in a mature population. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1636-8.
11. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:146-55.
12. Copt RP, Thomas R, Mermoud A. Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:14-6.
13. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 2005;14:344-50.
14. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Bostrom A, Nee M, Stamper RL. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1532-7.
15. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122: 1287-93.
16. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3790-4.
17. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3118-21.
18. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243: 359-66.
19. Mertz GW. Overnight swelling of the living human cornea. J Am Optom Assoc 1980;51:211-14.
20. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Aggarwala S, Evian S, Khosla J, Perera R. Diurnal variation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2007;16: 29-35.
21. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC, Thiel MA. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1104-8.
22. Dupont W, Plummer W. PS power and sample size program, version 2.1.30. Control Clin Trials 1997;2005:274.
23. Klyce SD. Stromal lactate accumulation can account for corneal oedema osmotically following epithelial hypoxia in the rabbit. J Physiol (Lond) 1981;321:49-64.
24. Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Sanderson G. The minimum precorneal oxygen tension to avoid corneal edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25:476-80.
25. Mandell RB, Farrell R. Corneal swelling at low atmospheric oxygen pressures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980;19:697-702.
26. Krakau CE, Wilke K. On repeated tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1971;49:611-14.
27. Moses RA, Liu CH. Repeated applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1968;66:89-91.
28. Realini T, Barber L, Burton D. Frequency of asymmetric intraocular pressure fluctuations among patients with and without glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1367-71.
29. Wilensky JT, Gieser DK, Dietsche ML, Mori MT, Zeimer R. Individual variability in the diurnal intraocular pressure curve. Ophthalmology 1993;100:940-4.
30. Gloster J. Tonometry and Tonography. International Ophthalmology Clinics, vol 5. Boston: Little, Brown; 1965.
31. Levy B, Nguyen N, Abbott RL, Gee M, Sviedrys A. Hypotony and corneal edema secondary to patching in normal eyes. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:72-5.
32. Wilke K. Effects of repeated tonometry: genuine and sham measurements. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1972;50:574-82.
33. Khan JA, Graham CE. Effect of contact lens removal or displacement on intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:825-8.
34. Hedbys BO, Mishima S. The thickness-hydration relationship of the cornea. Exp Eye Res 1966;5:221-8.
35. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38:1-30.
36. Lu F, Xu S, Qu J, Shen M, Wang X, Fang H, Wang J. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:616-22.
37. Barleon L, Hoffmann EM, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142: 583-90.
38. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1572-5.
39. Polse KA, Sarver MD, Harris MG. Corneal edema and vertical striae accompanying the wearing of hydrogel lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975;52:185-91.