The linguistics and psycholinguistics of agreement: A tutorial overview

Lingua

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 389-424

  Acuña Fariña, Juan Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Agreement; Features; Processing; Psycholinguistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 59149091287     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (158)

1. Anderson, S., 2004. Some points of agreement. Internet document.
2. Antón-Méndez I., Nicol J., and Garret M. The relation between gender and number agreement processing. Syntax 5 1 (2002) 1-25
3. Arnold J., Eisenband J.G., Brown-Schmidt S., and Trueswell J. The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eye-tracking. Cognition 76 (2000) B13-B26
4. Barber H., and Carreiras M. Integrating gender and number information in Spanish word pairs: an ERP study. Cortex 39 (2003) 465-482
5. Barber H., and Carreiras M. Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: an ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 1 (2005) 137-153
6. Barber H., Salillas E., and Carreiras M. Gender or genders agreement?. In: Carreiras M., and Clifton C. (Eds). On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension; Eye-tracking, ERP and Beyond (2004), Psychology Press, Brighton, UK 309-327
7. Barlow M. A Situated Theory of Agreement (1992), Garland, New York
8. Barlow M. Agreement as a discourse phenomenon. Folia Linguistica 33 (1999) 1-24
9. Bates E., and MacWhinney B. Functionalism and the competition model. In: MacWhinney B., and Bates E. (Eds). The Cross-Linguistic Study of Sentence Processing (1989), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK 1-73
10. Benveniste E. The nature of pronouns. Problems in General Linguistics (1971), University of Miami Press, Corel Gables, Florida pp. 217-222
11. Berg T. The resolution of number agreement conflicts in English and German agreement patterns. Linguistics 36 (1998) 41-70
12. Betancort M., Carreiras M., and Acuña-Fariña J.C. Processing controlled PROs in Spanish. Cognition 100 (2006) 217-282
13. Bhat D.N.S. Grammatical relations. The Evidence Against Their Necessity and Universality (1991), Routledge, London
14. Bock K., Cutler A., Eberhard K., Butterfield S., Cutting J.C., and Humphreys K. Number agreement in British and American English. Language 82 1 (2006) 64-113
15. Bock K., and Eberhard K.M. Meaning, sound, and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 8 (1993) 57-99
16. Bock K., Eberhard K.M., and Cutting J.C. Producing number agreement: how pronouns equal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language 51 (2004) 251-278
17. Bock K., Eberhard K.M., Cutting J.C., Meyer A., and Schriefers H. Some attractions of verb agreement. Cognitive Psychology 43 (2001) 83-128
18. Bock K., and Levelt W. Language production: grammatical encoding. In: Gernsbacher M.A. (Ed). Handbook of Psycholinguistics (1994), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
19. Bogdanov V.N. Osobyj slučaj dialektnogo soglasovanija skazuemogo s podležaščim po smyslu i kategorija predstavitel'nosti. Naučnye doklady vysšej školy: filologičeskie nauki 4 (1968) 68-75
20. Booij G. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In: Booij G., and van Marle J. (Eds). Yearbook of Morphology 1995 (1996), Kluwer, Dordrecht 1-15
21. Bradley D.C., and Foster K.L. A reader's view of listening. In: Frauenfelder U.H., and Tyler L.K. (Eds). Spoken Word Recognition (1987), C.U.P., Cambridge 103-133
22. Bybee J. Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form (Typological Studies in Language 99) (1985), John Benjamins, Amsterdam
23. Cacciari C., Carreiras M., and Cionini C.B. When words have two genders: anaphor resolution for Italian functionally ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1997) 517-532
24. Cacciari, C., Padovani, R., Carreiras, M., submitted for publication. Grammatical and discourse-based gender agreement in Italian pronouns.
25. Cameron R. Ambiguous agreement, functional compensation, and non-specific tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change 5 (1993) 305-334
26. Carminati M.N. Processing reflexes of the Feature Hierarchy and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua 115 (2005) 259-285
27. Carreiras M., Garham A., Oakhill J.V., and Cain K. The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: evidence from English and Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49A-3 (1996) 639-663
28. Carreiras M., and Gernsbacher A.M. Comprehending conceptual anaphors in Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes 7 (1992) 281-299
29. Casillas Martínez L. Gender mismatched in Spanish and French N1/A de N2 affective constructions: index agreement vs. morphosyntactic concord. In: Kim J., and Wechsler S. (Eds). Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford (2003) 1-17
30. Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Binding (1981), Foris, Dordrecht
31. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program (1995), M.I.T., Cambridge, MA
32. Chomsky N. Minimalist enquiries: the framework. In: Martin R., Michaels D., and Uriagereka J. (Eds). Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax: in Honour of Howard Lasnik (1999), M.I.T., Cambridge, MA
33. Chomsky, N., 2001. Beyond explanatory adequacy. M.I.T. Unpublished manuscript.
34. Colé P., and Seguí J. Grammatical incongruence and vocabulary types. Memory and Cognition 22 (1994) 387-394
35. Copestake, A., 2002. Implementing Typed Featured Structure Grammars (CSLI Lecture Notes 110). CSLI, Stanford.
36. Corbett G.S. The Agreement Hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15 (1979) 203-224
37. Corbett G.S. Gender (1991), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
38. Corbett G.S. Number (2000), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
39. Corbett G.S. Agreement (2006), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
40. Cowart W., and Cairns H.S. Evidence for an anaphoric mechanism within syntactic processing: some reference relations defy semantic and pragmatic constraints. Memory & Cognition 15 (1987) 318-331
41. Croft W. Radical Construction Grammar (2001), O.U.P., New York
42. Culicover P.W. Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases in Syntax (1999), O.U.P., Oxford
43. Deutsch A., and Bentin S. Syntactic and semantic factors in processing gender agreement in Hebrew: evidence from ERPs and eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 45 2 (2001) 200-224
44. De Vincenzi M. Differences between the morphology of gender and number: evidence from establishing coreferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28 (1999) 537-553
45. Di Domenico, E., De Vincenzi, M., 1995. Gender and number in the retrieval of pronoun antecedents: differences in use and representation. In: Nash, L., Tsoules, F., Zribi-Herts, A. (Eds.), Actes du deuxième colloque 'Langues et grammaire'. Paris, pp. 95-109.
46. Dik S. Functional Grammar (1978), North-Holland, Amsterdam
47. Dik S. Functional grammar. In: Droste F., and Joseph J. (Eds). Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description (1991), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 247-274
48. Dowty D., and Jacobson P. Agreement as a semantic phenomenon. In: Powers J., and Jong K.D. (Eds). Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (1988), Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 95-108
49. Eberhard K.M. The marked effect of number on subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language 36 (1997) 147-164
50. Eberhard K.M. The accessibility of conceptual number to the processes of subject-verb agreement in English. Journal of Memory and Language 41 (1999) 560-578
51. Eberhard K.M., Cutting J.C., and Bock K. Making syntax of sense: number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review 112 3 (2005) 531-559
52. Ehrlich K. Comprehension of pronouns. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1980) 247-255
53. Ehrlich K., and Rayner K. Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22 (1983) 75-87
54. Epstein S., and Seely D. Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax. In: Epstein S., and Seely D. (Eds). Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (2002), Blackwell, Oxford
55. Epstein S., and Seely D. Derivations in Minimalim (2006), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
56. Faussart C., Jacubowicz C., and Costes M. Gender and number processing in spoken French and Spanish. Rivista de Linguistica 11 (1999) 75-101
57. Ferguson C.A. Baby talk in six languages. Language 66 (1964) 103-114
58. Fernández-Salgueiro G. Agree, the EPP-F and further-raising in Spanish. In: Gess R., and Rubin E. (Eds). Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Romance Linguistics (2005), John Benjamins, Philadelphia
59. Fernández-Salgueiro, G., 2006. Romance Null Subjects and the Sensory-Motor Interface. Unpublished manuscript of the University of Michigan.
60. Franck J., Lasso G., Frauenfelder U., and Rizzi L. Agreement and movement: a syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition 101 (2006) 173-216
61. Frazier L., and Flores D'Arcais G. Filler-driven parsing: a study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28 (1989) 331-344
62. Friederici A.D. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language 50 (1995) 259-281
63. Friederici A.D., Hahne A., and Mecklinger A. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 22 5 (1996) 1219-1248
64. Garnham A., and Oakhill J. On-line resolution of anaphoric pronouns: effects of inference making and verb semantics. British Journal of Psychology 76 (1985) 385-393
65. Garnham A., Oakhill J., Ehrlich M.-F., and Carreiras M. Representations and processes in the interpretation of pronouns: new evidence from Spanish and French. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 41-62
66. Garnham A., Traxler M., Oakhill J., and Gernsbacher M.A. The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 35 (1996) 517-543
67. Garrod S., Freudenthal D., and Boyle E. The role of different types of anaphors in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1994) 39-68
68. Garrod S., and Sanford A.J. Referential processing in reading. Focusing on roles and individuals. In: Balota D.A., Flores d'Arcais G.B., and Rayner K. (Eds). Comprehension Processes in Reading (1990), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 465-480
69. Garrod S., and Terras M. The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 42 (2000) 526-544
70. Gernsbacher M.A. Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition 32 2 (1989) 99-156
71. Gernsbacher M.A. Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 6 (1991) 81-105
72. Goldberg A. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure (1995), Chicago UP, Chicago
73. Goldberg A. Constructions at Work (2006), O.U.P., Oxford
74. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., and Foster K.L. Language comprehension and probe-list memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (2000) 766-775
75. Greenberg J.H. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In: Greenberg J.H. (Ed). Universals of Grammar (1963), M.I.T., Cambridge, MA 73-113
76. Greene S.B., McKoon G., and Ratcliff R. Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 18 (1992) 266-283
77. Grevisse, M., 1964. Le bon Usage, 8th ed. J. Duculot, Glembloux.
78. Gunter T.C., Friederici A.D., and Schriefers H. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (2000) 556-568
79. Hagoort P., and Brown C.M. Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28 6 (1999) 715-728
80. Hagoort P., Brown C., and Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 8 (1993) 439-483
81. Harley H., and Ritter E. Person and number in pronouns: motivating a feature-geometric analysis. Language 78 (2002) 482-526
82. Harris A. Georgian Syntax: a Study in Relational Grammar (1981), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
83. Haskell T., and Macdonald M. Conflicting cues and competition in subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language 48 (2003) 760-778
84. Hawkins R. Towards an account of the possessive constructions: "NP's N" and "the N of NP". Journal of Linguistics 17 (1981) 247-269
85. Hawkins J. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency (1994), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
86. Hawkins J. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars (2004), O.U.P., Oxford
87. Heap, D., 2000. La variation grammaticale en géolinguistique: les pronoms sujet en roman central (Lincom Studies in Romance Linguistics 11). Lincom Europa, Munich.
88. Huddleston R., and Pullum G. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (2002), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
89. Hudson R. Subject-verb agreement in English. Journal of English Language and Linguistics 3 (1999) 173-207
90. Igoa J.M., García-Albea J.E., and Sánchez-Casas R. Gender-number dissociations in sentence production in Spanish. Rivista di Linguistica 11 (1999) 163-196
91. Jespersen O. Language, Its Nature, Development and Origin (1922), Henry Colt and Co., New York
92. Jespersen O. The Philosophy of Grammar (1924), Allen & Unwin, London
93. Joseph B.D. On the agreement of reflexive forms in English. Linguistics 17 (1979) 519-523
94. Kaplan R., and Bresnan J. Lexical-functional grammar: a formal system for grammatical representations. In: Bresnan J. (Ed). The Mental Representations of Grammatical Relations (1982), M.I.T., Cambridge, MA 173-281
95. Kay P., and Fillmore C.J. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What's X doing Y? construction. Language 75 (1999) 1-33
96. Kazanina N., Lau E., Lieberman M., Yoshida M., and Phillips C. The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language 56 (2007) 384-409
97. Kennison S.M., and Trofe J.L. Comprehending pronouns: a role for word-specific gender stereotype information. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research 32 3 (2003) 355-378
98. Konishi T. The semantics of grammatical gender: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22 (1993) 519-534
99. Kutas M., and Hillyard S.A. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition 11 (1983) 539-550
100. Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind (1987), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
101. Lambrecht K. Information Structure and Sentence Form (1994), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
102. Langacker R. Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar (1991), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
103. Lehmann, C., 1982. Universal and typological aspects of agreement. In: Seiler, H., Stachowiak, F.J. (Eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachlichte Erfassen von Gegenständen II: Die Techniken und ihr Zusammenhang in Einzelsprachen. Narr, Tübingen, pp. 201-267.
104. Levelt W., Roeloffs A., and Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Science 22 (1999) 1-75
105. Levin M. Agreement with Collective Nouns in English (Lund Studies in English 103) (2001), Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm
106. Lukatella G., Kostic A., Todorovic D., Carello C., and Turvey M.T. Type and number of violations and the grammatical congruency effect in lexical decision. Psychological Research 49 (1987) 37-43
107. MacDonald M., and MacWhinney B. Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language 29 (1990) 469-492
108. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N., and Seidenberg M.S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101 (1994) 676-703
109. Mallinson G., and Blake B. Language Typology: Cross-Linguistic Studies in Syntax (1981), North Holland, Amsterdam
110. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K., and Koster C. Integrative processes in utterance resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (1993) 647-666
111. McDonald J.L., and MacWhinney J. The time course of anaphor resolution: effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 543-566
112. Mills A.E. The Acquisition of Gender: a Study of English and German (1986), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
113. Moravcsik E. Agreement. In: Greenberg H., Ferguson C.A., and Moravcsik E. (Eds). Universals of Human Language. IV. Syntax (1978), Stanford University Press, Stanford 331-374
114. Moravcsik E. Summing up Suffixaufnahme. In: Plank F. (Ed). Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford 451-484
115. Morgan J.J. Some problems of agreement in English and Albanian. In: Brugman C., Maccauley M., Dahlstrom A., Emanatian M., Moonwoman B., and O'Connor C. (Eds). Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1984), Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkely 233-247
116. Münte T.F., and Heinze H.J. ERP negativities during syntactic processing of written words. In: Heinze H.J., Münte T.F., and Mangun G.R. (Eds). Cognitive Electrophysiology (1994), Birkäuser, Boston 211-238
117. Neville H., Nicol J.L., Barss A., Forster K.I., and Garrett M.F. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3 (1991) 151-165
118. Nicol, J., 1988. Coreference processing during sentence comprehension. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation: M.I.T.
119. Nunes J. Linearization of chains and phonetic realization of chain links. In: Epstein S., and Hornstein N. (Eds). Working Minimalism (1999), M.I.T., Cambridge, MA 217-249
120. Nunes J. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement (2004), M.I.T., Cambridge, MA
121. Osterhout L., Bersick M., and McLaughlin J. Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Memory and Cognition 25 (1997) 273-275
122. Osterhout L., and Holcomb P.J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 31 (1992) 785-806
123. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J., and Swinney D.A. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 (1994) 786-803
124. Osterhout L., and Mobley L.A. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 739-773
125. Pesetsky D. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades (1995), M.I.T., Cambridge, MA
126. Picallo M.C. Nominals and nominalization in Catalan. Probus 3 (1991) 279-316
127. Pollard, C., Sag, I.A., 1988. An information-based theory of agreement. In: Brentari, G., Larson, G., McLeod, L. (Eds.), Papers from the 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, pp. 236-257.
128. Pollard C., and Sag I. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
129. Radford A. Minimalist Syntax (2004), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
130. Reid W. Verb and Noun Number in English (1991), Longman, London
131. Rigalleau F., and Caplan D. Effects of gender marking in pronominal coindexation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 53A (2000) 23-52
132. Rigalleau F., Caplan D., and Baudiffier V. New arguments in favour of an automatic gender pronominal process. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A 57 (2004) 893-933
133. Ritter E. A head movement approach to construct state noun phrases. Linguistics 26 (1988) 909-929
134. Ritter E. Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from modern Hebrew. In: Rothstein S. (Ed). Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure (1991), Academic Press, New York 37-62
135. Ritter E. Where's gender?. Linguistic Inquiry 24 (1993) 795-803
136. Rusakova, M.V., 2001. Imennaja slovoforma flektivnogo jazyka (soglasovanie v russkom atributivnom slovosočetanii). Unpublished PhD dissertation, St Petersburg: Gosudarstvennyj pedagogičeskij universitet im. A.I. Gercena.
137. Sera M., Berge C., and del Castillo J. Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development 9 3 (1994) 261-292
138. Sera M., Selieff C., Burch M., Forbes J., and Rodriguez W. When language affects cognition and when it does not: an analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 131 (2002) 377-397
139. Shieber, S., 1986. An Introduction to Unification-based Approaches to Grammar (CSLI Lecture Notes 4). CSLI, Stanford.
140. Siewierska A. Variation in major constituent order: a global and a European perspective. In: Siewierska A. (Ed). Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe (1998), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 475-551
141. Siewierska A. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical agreement marker: why objects don't make it. Folia Linguistica 33 2 (1999) 225-251
142. Silverstein M. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In: Muysken P., and van Riemsdijk H. (Eds). Features and Projections (1985), Foris, Dordrecht 163-232
143. Sonderegger S. Dichterische Wortstellungstypen im Altgermanischen und ihr Nachleben im älteren Deutsch. In: Askedal J.O. (Ed). Historische Germanische und Deutsche Syntax (1998), Frankfurt am Main, Lang 25-47
144. Stowe L. Models of Gap Location in the Human Language Processor (1986), Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN
145. Sturt P. The time course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 48 (2003) 542-562
146. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M., and Hanna J.E. Modelling thematic and discourse context effects with a multiple constraints approach: implications for the language comprehension system. In: Crocker M.W., Pickering M., and Clifton C. (Eds). Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (2000), C.U.P., Cambridge, MA 90-118
147. Taraban R., and McClelland J.R. Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: influence of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language 27 (1988) 597-632
148. Taylor J. Cognitive Grammar (2002), O.U.P., Oxford
149. Thornton R., and MacDonald M. Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language 48 (2003) 740-759
150. Tsoulas G., and Kural M. Indexical pronouns as bound variables. In: Bird S., Tsoulas G., and Kuras M. (Eds). Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (1998) 545-557
151. Van Gompel R., and Liversedge S. The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition 29 1 (2003) 128-139
152. Van Valin R., and Lapolla R. Syntax (1997), C.U.P., Cambridge, UK
153. Vigliocco G., Butterworth B., and Garrett M.F. Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: the role of conceptual factors. Cognition 51 (1996) 261-298
154. Vigliocco G., and Franck J. When sex affects syntax: contextual influences in sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language 45 (2001) 368-390
155. Vigliocco G., and Hartsuiker R.J. The interplay of meaning, sound and syntax in language production. Psychological Bulletin 128 (2002) 442-472
156. Vigliocco G., Hartsuiker R.J., Jarema G., and Kolk H.H.J. One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes 11 (1996) 407-442
157. Vigliocco G., Vinson D.P., Paganelli F., and Dwrzynski K. Grammatical gender effects on cognition: implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology 134 4 (2005) 501-520
158. Vonk W. Eye movement during the comprehension of pronouns. In: Gale A.G., and Johnson F. (Eds). Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (1984), North Holland, Amsterdam 203-212