When words have two genders: Anaphor resolution for italian functionally ambiguous words

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 517-532

  Cacciari, Cristina ^a   Carreiras, Manuel ^b   Cionini, Cristina Barbolini ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b Dipartimento di Psicologia   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031281974     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2528     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Badecker W., Miozzo M., Zanuttini R. The two stages model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition. 57:1995;193-216.
2. E. Bates, B. MacWhinney, 1989, The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Bates E., Devescovi A., Pizzamiglio L., D'Amico S., Hernandez A. Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics. 57:1995.
4. Bisiacchi P. An investigation of the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) phenomenon in Italian. 1995.
5. Burani C. Patterns of inflectional error with reference to the Italian adjectival system. Rivista di Linguistica. 4:1992.
6. Carreiras M. Plural pronouns and the representation of their antecedents. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 9:1997.
7. Carreiras M., Gernsbacher M. A. Comprehending conceptual anaphors in Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes. 7:1992;281-299.
8. Carreiras M., Garnham A., Oakhill J. The use of superficial and meaning-based representations in interpreting pronouns. Evidence from Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 5:1993.
9. Carreiras M., Garnham A., Oakhill J. Understanding anaphora: The role of superficial and conceptual information. Language processing in Spanish. 1996;Hillsdale, Erlbaum.
10. Carreiras M., Garnham A., Oakhill J., Cain K. The use of stereotypical information in costructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 49A:1996;639-663.
11. M. Chini, 1995, Genere grammaticale e acquisizione: Aspetti della morfologia nominale in Italiano L2, Franco Angeli, Milan.
12. Clark H. H., Sengul C. J. In search of referents for noun phrases and pronouns. Memory and Cognition. 7:1979;35-41.
13. Cloitre M., Bever T. Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes. 3:1988.
14. Corbett G. Gender. 1991;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
15. Corbett A. T., Chang F. R. Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents. Memory and Cognition. 11:1983;283-294.
16. Crawley R. A., Stevenson R. J., Kleiman D. The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 19:1990;245-264.
17. Ehrlich K., Rayner K. Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 22:1983;75-87.
18. A. Garnham, 1987, Understanding anaphora, Progress in the psychology of language, A. W. Ellis, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Garnham A., Oakhill J. On-line resolution of anaphoric pronouns: Effects of inference making and verb semantics. British Journal of Psychology. 76:1985;385-393.
20. Garnham A., Oakhill J., Cruttunden H. The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns. Language and Cognitive Processes. 7:1992;231-255.
21. Garnham A., Oakhill J., Erlich M. F., Carreiras M. Representations and processes in the interpretation of pronouns: New evidence from Spanish and French. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;41-62.
22. Garrod S., Freudenthal D., Boyle E. The role of different types of anaphor in the on-line resolution of sentence in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;39-68.
23. Gernsbacher M. Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition. 32:1989;99-156.
24. Gernsbacher M. A. Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes. 6:1991;81-105.
25. Gordon P. C., Chan D. Pronouns, passives and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;216-231.
26. Gordon P. C., Grosz B. J., Guilliom L. A. Pronouns, names and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science. 17:1993;311-347.
27. Gordon P. C., Scearce K. A. Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation. Memory and Cognition. 23:1995;313-323.
28. Greene S. B., McKoon G., Ratcliff R. Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 18:1992.
29. Grosjean F., Dommergues J. Y., Cornu E., Guillemon D., Besson C. The gender-marking effect in spoken word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics. 56:1994.
30. Grober E. H., Bearsley W., Caramazza A. Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment. Cognition. 6:1978;117-133.
31. B. J. Grosz, A. K. Joshi, S. Weinstein, 1983, Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.
32. Grosz B. J., Sidner C. L. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics. 12:1986;175-204.
33. Hankamer J., Sag I. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry. 3:1976;391-426.
34. Jarema G., Friederici A. D. Processing articles and pronouns in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from French. Brain and Language. 46:1994;683-694.
35. Lucas M. M., Tanenhaus M. K., Carlson G. N. Levels of representation in the interpretation of anaphoric reference and instrument reference. Memory & Cognition. 18:1990;611-631.
36. S. Kripke, 1980, Naming and necessity, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
37. Marcantonio A., Pretto A. M. Il nome. Renzi L. Grande grammatica di consultazione della lingua Italiana. 1988;Il Mulino, Bologna.
38. Marslen-Wilson W., Levy E., Tyler L. Producing interpretable discourse: The establishment and maintenance of reference. Jarvella R. J., Klein W. Speech, place and action. 1982;Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
39. Matthews A., Chodorow M. S. Pronoun resolution in two-clause sentences: Effects of ambiguity, antecedent location, and depth of embedding. Journal of Memory and Language. 27:1988;245-260.
40. McDonald M. C., MacWhinney B. The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995.
41. McKoon G., Greene S. B., Ratcliff R. Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 19:1993;1040-1052.
42. McKoon G., Gerrig R. J., Greene S. B. Pronoun resolution without pronouns: Some consequences of memory-based text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 22:1995;919-932.
43. Murphy G. L. Processes of understanding anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language. 24:1985;290-303.
44. Murphy G. L. Interpretation of verb phrase anaphora: Influences of task and syntactic context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 42A:1990;675-692.
45. Oakhill J. V., Garnham A., Gernsbacher M. A., Cain K. How natural are conceptual anaphors? Language and Cognitive Processes. 7:1992;257-280.
46. Sag I., Hankamer J. Toward a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy. 7:1984;325-345.
47. Sanford A. J., Garrod S. Understanding written language. 1981;Wiley, New York.
48. Scalise S. Morfologia. 1994;Il Mulino, Bologna.
49. Taft M., Meunier F. A challenge for neural networks: Gender processing in French. 1995.
50. Tanenhaus M. K., Carlson G. N. Comprehension of deep and surface verb phrase anaphora. Language and Cognitive Processes. 5:1990;257-280.
51. Vigliocco G., Antonini T., Garrett M. F. Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science. 8:1997;314-317.
52. Vonk W., Hustinx L. G. M. M., Simons W. H. G. The use of referential expressions in structuring discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes. 7:1992;301-333.