Processing controlled PROs in Spanish

Cognition

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 217-282

  Betancort, Moises ^a   Carreiras, Manuel ^a   Acuña Fariña, Carlos ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; READING; SPAIN; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

COGNITION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SPAIN;

EID: 33745133670     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Betancort M., Meseguer E., and Carreiras M. The empty category PRO: Processing what can't be seen. In: Carreiras M., and Clifton C. (Eds). The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP, and beyond (2004), Psychology Press, Brighton
2. Bever T.G., and McElree B. Empty categories access their antecedent during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry 19 (1988) 35-43
3. Bever T.G., and Sanz M. Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension of Spanish unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 28 (1997) 69-91
4. Boland J., and Tanenhaus M.K. The role of lexical representation in sentence processing. In: Simpson G.B. (Ed). Understanding word and sentence (1991), North Holland, Amsterdam/Elsevier
5. Boland J.E., Tanenhaus M.K., and Garnsey S.M. Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 29 (1990) 413-432
6. Bresnan J. The theory of complementation in English syntax. Doctoral dissertation (1982), MIT, Cambridge, MA
7. Brysbaert M., and Mitchell D.C. Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A-Human Experimental Psychology 49 3 (1996) 664-695
8. Cattell R. Composite predicates in English (1984), Academic Press, New York, NY
9. Chierchia G. Structured meanings, thematic roles, and control. In: Chierchia G., Partee B., and Turner R. (Eds). Properties, types, and meaning Vol. 2 (1988), Kluwer, Dordrecht 131-136
10. Chomsky N. Lectures on government and binding (1981), Foris, Dordrecht
11. Chomsky N. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use (1986), Praeger, New York, NY
12. Clifton Jr. C., and Frazier L. The use of syntactic information in filling gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic research 15 (1986) 209-224
13. Clifton Jr. C., and Frazier L. Comprehending sentence with long distance dependencies. In: Carlson G., and Tanenhaus M. (Eds). Linguistics structure in language processing (1989), Klewer, Dordrech, The Netherlands 273-317
14. Cloitre M., and Bever T.G. Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes 3 (1988) 293-322
15. Coulson S., King J., and Kutas M. Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes 13 (1998) 21-58
16. Cowart W., and Cairns H.S. Evidence for an anaphoric mechanism within syntactic processing: Some reference relations defy semantic and pragmatic constraints. Memory & Cognition 15 (1987) 318-331
17. Crain S., and Fodor J.D. How can grammars help parsers?. In: Dowty D.R., Karttunen L., and Zwicky A.M. (Eds). Natural language parsing (1985), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
18. Culicover P.W., and Jackendoff R. Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32/3 (2001) 493-511
19. Demestre J., Meltzer S., García Albea J.E., and Vigil A. Identifying the null subject: Evidence from event-related brain potential. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28 (1999) 293-312
20. De Vincenci M. Syntactically-based parsing strategies: evidence from typologically different languages. In: Hillert D. (Ed). Syntax and semantics Vol. 31 (1998), Academic Press, New York, NY 337-344
21. Duffy S.A., Morris R.K., and Rayner K. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 27 (1988) 429-446
22. Featherston S., Gross M., Munte T.F., and Clahsen H. Brain potentials in the processing of complex sentences: An ERP study of control and raising constructions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29 (2000) 141-154
23. Fernández Lagunilla M., and Anula Rebollo A. Sintaxis y cognición. Introducción al conocimiento, el procesamiento y los déficits sintácticos (1995), Síntesis, Madrid
24. Ferreira F., and Clifton Jr. C. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25 (1986) 348-368
25. Ferreira F., and Henderson J. The use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye-movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 (1990) 555-568
26. Fiebach C.J., Schlesewsky M., and Friederici A. Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights of ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research (2001) 30321-30338
27. Fiebach C.J., Schlesewsky M., and Friederici A. Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 250-272
28. Fodor J.A. Modularity of mind (1983), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
29. Fodor J.D. Parsing strategies and constraints in transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 9 (1978) 427-474
30. Fodor J.D. On modularity in syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 17 (1988) 125-163
31. Fodor J.D. Empty categories in sentence processing. In: Altman G. (Ed). Special issue on language and congnitive processes. Parsing and interpretation Vol. 4(3/4) (1989) SI155-SI209
32. Ford M., and Dalrymple M. A note on some psychological evidence and alternative grammars. Cognition 29 (1988) 63-71
33. Frazier L. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In: Coltheart M. (Ed). Attention and performance (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 559-586
34. Frazier L. Processing Dutch sentence structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22 (1993) 85-108
35. Frazier L. Getting there (slowly). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27 (1998) 123-126
36. Frazier L., and Clifton Jr. C. Sucessive cyclicity in the grammar and parser. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (1989) 93-126
37. Frazier L., and Clifton Jr. C. Construal (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Frazier L., Clifton Jr. C., and Randall J. Filling gaps: decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension. Cognition 13 (1983) 187-222
39. Frazier L., and Flores D'Arçais G. Filler-driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28 (1989) 331-344
40. Friederici A.D., Pfeifer E., and Hahne A. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological, and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research 1 (1993) 183-192
41. García-Albea J.E., and Meltzer S. Processing empty categories in Spanish. In: Carreiras M., García-Albea J.E., and Sebastian-Galles N. (Eds). Language processing in Spanish (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum, Nahwah
42. Garnsey S.M., Pearlmutter N.J., Myers E., and Lotocky M.A. The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1997) 58-93
43. Garnsey S.M., Tanenhaus M.K., and Chapman R.M. Evoked potential and the study of comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18 (1989) 51-60
44. Haegemann L. Introduction to government and binding theory (1991), Oxford, Blackwell
45. Haegeman L. Introduction to government and binding theory (1994), Blackwell, Oxford
46. Haggort P., Brown C., and Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 8 (1993) 439-483
47. Hare M., McRae K., and Elman J. Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analysis makes sense. Language and Cognitive Processes 19 2 (2004) 181-224
48. Hornstein N. A primer on PRO (and other empty categories). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20 (1991) 187-195
49. Hornstein N. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (1999) 69-96
50. Huddleston R., and Pullum G.K. The Cambridge grammar of the English language (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
51. Jackendoff R. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar (1972), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
52. Jackendoff R. A deep structure projection rule. Linguistic Inquiry 5 (1974) 481-506
53. Konieczny L., Hemforth B., Scheepers C., and Strube G. The role of lexical heads in parsing: Evidence from German. Language and Cognitive Processes 12 (1997) 307-348
54. Liversedge, S. P. (1994). Referential context, relative clauses, and syntactic parsing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Dundee.
55. MacDonald M.C. Priming effects from gaps to antecedents. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (1989) 35-36
56. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N., and Seidenberg M.S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101 (1994) 676-703
57. Manzini R. On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14 (1983) 421-446
58. Marcos-Marín F., Satorre F.J., and Viejo L. Gramática española (1998), Síntesis, Madrid
59. Mauner G., and Koenig J.P. Lexical encoding of event participant information. Journal of Memory and Language 43 (2000) 110-134
60. Manuer G., Melinger A., Koenig J.P., and Bienvenue B. When is schematic participant information encoded? Evidence from eye-monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 386-406
61. Mauner G., Tanenhaus M., and Carlson G. Implicit arguments in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 357-382
62. McConkie G.W., and Zola D. Visual attention during eye fixations while reading. In: Coltheart M. (Ed). Attention and performance Vol. 12 (1987), Erlbaum, London 385-401
63. McElree B., and Bever T. The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18 (1989) 21-35
64. Nicol, J. (1988). Co-references in parsing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. MIT.
65. Nicol J., and Swinney D. The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18 (1989) 5-19
66. Osterhout L. On the brain responses to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language 59 (1997) 494-522
67. Osterhout L., and Swinney D.A. On the temporal course of gap-filling during comprehension of verbal passives. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research 22 (1993) 273-286
68. Rayner K., Well A.D., and Pollatsek A. The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 31 (1982) 537-550
69. Rosenbaum P. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions (1967), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
70. Sag, I., & Fodor, J. (1995). Extraction without traces. Proceedings of the 13th west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 365-384).
71. Sag I., and Pollard C. An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67 (1991) 63-113
72. Schmauder A.R. Argument structure frames: A lexical complexity metric?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning: Memory, and Cognition 17 (1991) 49-65
73. Sebastián N., Martí M.A., Carreiras M., and Cuetos F. LEXESP: Una base de datos informatizada del español (2000), Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona
74. Shapiro L., and Nagel N. Preference for a verb's complements and their use in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (1993) 96-114
75. Stowe L. Models of gap location in the human language processor (1984), Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN
76. Swinney D.A., Ford U., Frauenfelder U., and Bresnan J. On the temporal course of gap-filling and antecedent-assignment during sentence comprehension. In: Grosz B., Kaplan R., Machen M., and Sag I. (Eds). Language structure and processing (1988), CSLI, Standford, CA
77. Tanenhaus M.K., Boland J., Garsney S., and Carlson G. Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18 (1989) 37-50
78. Tanenhaus M.K., and Trueswell J.C. Sentence comprehension. In: Miller J., and Eimas P. (Eds). Handbook of perception and cognition: Speech, language, and communication. (2nd ed.) Vol. 11 (1995), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 217-262
79. Traxler M., Pickering M., and Clifton Jr. C. Adjunt attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 39 (1998) 558-592
80. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., and Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1994) 285-318
81. Underwood N.R., and McConkie G.W. Perceptual span for letter distinction during reading. Reading Research Quarterly 20 (1985) 153-162