New arguments in favour of an automatic gender pronominal process

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 893-933

  Rigalleau, François ^a,c   Caplan, David ^b   Baudiffier, Vanessa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; READING; RECOGNITION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 3142705124     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000549     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Albrecht, J. E., & Clifton, C. Jr. (1998). Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases. Memory and Cognition, 26, 599-610.
2. Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 65-87.
3. Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents, London: Routledge.
4. Brennan, S. E. (1995). Centering attention in discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 137-167.
5. Cacciari, C., Carreiras, M., & Cionini, C. B. (1997). When words have two genders: Anaphor resolution for Italian functionally ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 517-532.
6. Chafe, W. L. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language, 50, 111-133.
7. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). Psyscope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
8. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
9. Ehrlich, K., & Rayner, K. (1983). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 75-87.
10. Fletcher, C. (1984). Markedness and topic continuity in discourse processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 487-494.
11. Fox, B. A. (1987). Discourse structure and anaphora: Written and conversational English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
13. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cruttenden, H. (1992). The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 231-255.
14. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., Ehrlich, M.-F., & Carreiras, M. (1995). Representations and processes in the interpretation of pronouns: New evidence from Spanish and French. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 41-62.
15. Garnham, A., Traxler, M., Oakhill, J. V., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996). The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 517-543.
16. Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 469-464.
17. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99-156.
18. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991). Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 81-105.
19. Gerrig, R. J., & McKoon, G. (1998). The readiness is all: The functionality of memory-based text processing. Discourse Processes, 26, 67-86.
20. Gerrig, R. J., & McKoon, G. (2001). Memory processes and experiential continuity. Psychological Science, 12, 81-85.
21. Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311-347.
22. Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1998). The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science, 22, 389-424.
23. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Ledoux Foster, K. (2000). Language comprehension and probe-list memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 766-775.
24. Greene, S. B., Gerrig, R. J., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Unheralded pronouns and management by common gound. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 511-526.
25. Greene, S. B., & McKoon, G. (1995). Telling something we can't know: Experimental approaches to verbs exhibiting implicit causality. Psychological Science, 6, 262-270.
26. Greene, S. B., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 266-283.
27. Huang, Y. (2000). Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Kennison, P., & Gordon, P. C. (1997). Comprehending referential expressions during reading: Evidence from eye tracking. Discourse Processes, 24, 229-252.
29. Leonard, C., Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1997). The use of contextual information by the right brain-damaged individuals in the resolution of ambiguous pronouns. Brain and Language, 57, 309-342.
30. MacDonald, M. C., & MacWhinney, B. (1990). Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 469-492.
31. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Levy, E., & Tyler, L. K. (1982). Producing interpretable discourse: The establishment and maintenance of reference. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place and action (pp. 339-378). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
32. McKoon, G., Gerrig, R. J., & Greene, S. B. (1996). Pronoun resolution without pronouns: Some consequences of memory-based text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 919-932.
33. Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processing, 26, 131-157.
34. Rigalleau, F., & Caplan, D. (2000). Effects of gender marking in pronominal coindexation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 23-52.
35. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1989). What, when, and how?: Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 235-262.