How to optimize learning from animated models: A review of guidelines based on cognitive load

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 645-675

  Wouters, Pieter ^a   Paas, Fred ^b   van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Animations; Cognitive load theory; Cognitive modeling; Computers and learning; Instructional design development; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

EID: 59049103463     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0034654308320320     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Ainsworth, S., & VanLabeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 241-256.
2. Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 416-427.
3. Baddeley, A. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
4. Bandura, A. (1976). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Casey, C. (1996). Incorporating cognitive apprenticeship in multi-media. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 44, 74-84.
6. Catrambone, R. (1996). Generalizing solution procedures learned from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1020-1031.
7. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that learners can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 127, 355-376.
8. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185-233.
9. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 151-170.
10. Chee, Y. C. (1995). Cognitive apprenticeship and its application to the teaching of Smalltalk in a multimedia interactive learning environment. Instructional Science, 23, 133-161.
11. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How learners study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
12. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding, Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
13. Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W. L., & Shaw, E. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents: An opportunity to be grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11, 267-286.
14. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
15. Clark, R. E., & Choi, S. (2005). Five design principles for experiments on the effects of animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 209-225.
16. Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 121-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learning by imagining. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 68-82.
19. Cox, R., McKendree, J., Tobin, R., Lee, J., & Mayes, T. (1999). Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse. Instructional Science, 27, 431-458.
20. Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effect of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 428-434.
21. Craig, S. D., Graesser, A. C., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 241-250.
22. de Croock, M., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: Effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 249-267.
23. Dehn, D. M., & van Mulken, S. (2000). The impact of animated interface agents: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 1-22.
24. Fisher, F. L., & Ford, J. K. (1998). Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 51, 397-420.
25. Fisk, J. E., & Warr, P. (1996). Age and working memory: The role of perceptual speed, the central executive, and the phonological loop. Psychology and Aging, 11, 316-323.
26. Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist, 38, 33-41.
27. Gilinsky, A. S., & Judd, B. B. (1994). Working memory and bias in reasoning across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 9, 356-371.
28. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313-331.
29. Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14, 343-352.
30. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 325-360.
31. Holladay, C. L., & Quinones, M. A. (2003). Practice variability and transfer of training: The role of self-efficacy generality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1094-1103.
32. Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17, 329-343.
33. Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Kalyuga, S. (2005). Prior knowledge principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 325-338). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-31.
36. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
37. Kitsantas, A., Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. (2000). The role of observation and emulation in the development of athletic self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 241-250.
38. Koroghlanian, C., & Klein, J. D. (2004). The effect of audio and animation in multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 23-46.
39. Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load and the imagination effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 857-875.
40. Light, L. L., Zelinski, E. M., & Moore, M. (1982). Adult age differences in reasoning from new information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 435-447.
41. Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225-244.
42. Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157-176.
43. Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 377-389.
44. Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Mayer, R. (2005a). Principles in managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 169-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Mayer, R. (2005b). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 183-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Mayer, R. (2005c). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 201-214). New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390-397.
49. Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 806-812.
50. Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 256-265.
51. Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 147-154.
52. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
53. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87-99.
54. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-53.
55. Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., & Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 638-643.
56. Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
57. Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., & Mautone, P. D. (2003). Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 419-425.
58. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum.
59. Michas, I. C., & Berry, D. C. (2000). Learning a procedural task: Effectiveness of multimedia presentations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 555-575.
60. Moreno, R. (2005). Multimedia learning with animated pedagogical agents. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 507-524). New York: Cambridge University Press.
61. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358-368.
62. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, E., & Hiller, A. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do learners learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177-213.
63. Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (2005). Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53, 35-45.
64. Moundridou, M., & Virvou, M. (2002). Evaluating the persona effect of an interface agent in a tutoring system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 253-261.
65. Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.
66. Paas, F., Camp, G., & Rikers, R. (2001). Instructional compensation for age-related cognitive declines: Effects of goal specificity in maze learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 181-186.
67. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1-4.
68. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1-8.
69. Paas, F., van Gerven, P. W. M., & Tabbers, H. K. (2005). The cognitive aging principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 339-354). New York: Cambridge University Press.
70. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving skills: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133.
71. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
72. Park, O.-C., & Hopkins, R. (1993). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays. Instructional Science, 21, 427-449.
73. Penney, C. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 17, 398-422.
74. Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61-86.
75. Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144-161.
76. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1-29.
78. Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Learning from examples: Fostering self-explanations in computer-based learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 10, 105-119.
79. Rieber, L. P. (1990). Animation in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 38, 77-86.
80. Rieber, L. P., & Kini, A. S. (1991). Theoretical foundations of instructional applications of computer-generated animated visuals. American Journal of Psychology, 18, 83-88.
81. Roy, M., & Chi, M., T., H. (2005). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 271-286). New York: Cambridge University Press.
82. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428.
83. Salthouse, T. A., Mitchell, D. R. D., Skovronek, E., & Babcock, R. L. (1989). Effects of adult age and working memory on reasoning and spatial abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 507-516.
84. Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 101-120.
85. Schwan, S., & Garsoffky, B. (2004). The cognitive representation of filmic event summaries. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 37-55.
86. Schwan, S., Garsoffky, B., & Hesse, F. W. (2000). Do film cuts facilitate the perceptual and cognitive organization of activity sequences? Memory and Cognition, 28, 214-223.
87. Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293-305.
88. Shah, P., & Freedman, E. G. (2003). Visuospatial cognition in electronic learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29, 315-324.
89. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
90. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
91. Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9-31.
92. Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 159-168). New York: Cambridge University Press.
93. Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and the human cognitive architecture. Learning and Instruction, 16, 165-169.
94. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
95. Tabbers, H. (2002). The modality of text in multimedia instruction: Refining the design guidelines Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open University of the Netherlands.
96. Tabbers, H., Martens, R., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 71-81.
97. Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424-436.
98. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Does it facilitate learning? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
99. van Gerven, P., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J., Hendriks, M., & Schmidt, H. (2003). The efficiency of multimedia learning into old age. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 489-505.
100. van Gog, T., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Process-oriented worked examples: Improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding. Instructional Science, 32, 83-98.
101. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
102. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5-13.
103. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J., de Croock, M., & Paas, F. (2002). Redirecting learners' attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 11-37.
104. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147-177.
105. Weiss, R. E., Knowlton, D. S., & Morrison, G. R. (2002). Principles for using animation in computer-based instruction: Theoretical heuristics for effective design. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 465-477.
106. Wetzel, D. C., Radtke, P. H., & Stern, H. W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
107. Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative activity. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
108. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21.
109. Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2002). Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skills through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 660-668.