Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 35-45

  Moreno, Roxana ^a   Valdez, Alfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23744446807     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02504796     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(2), 111-127.
2. Baddeley, A. (1998). Human memory. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 213-238.
4. Bruning, R., Horn, C. A., & PytlikZillig, L. M. (2003). Web-based learning: What do we know? Where do we go? Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
5. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Cairncross, S., & Mannion, M. (2001). Interactive multimedia and learning: Realizing the benefits. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 156-164.
7. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
8. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
9. Clark, J.M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
10. Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. [This special issue]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 15-24.
11. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
12. Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. [This special issue]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 83-93.
13. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179-211.
14. Macromedia. (2002). Flash MX™ [Computer program]. San Francisco, CA: Author.
15. Martin, V. L., & Pressley, M. (1991). Elaborative-interrogation effects depend on the nature of the question. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 113-119.
16. Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390-397.
17. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52.
18. Moreno, R., & Durán, R. (2004). Do multiple representations need explanations? The role of verbal guidance and individual differences in multimedia mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 492-503.
19. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000a). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 117-125.
20. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000b). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 724-733.
21. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Gopalakrishnan, M., & Casey, J. (1995). The effects of feedback and incentives on achievement in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 32-50.
22. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63-71.
23. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learners' involvement in instructional conditions. [This special issue]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3),25-33.
24. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental-effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737-743.
25. Rabinowitz, J. C., & Craik, F. I. M. (1986). Specific enhancement effects associated with word generation. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 226-237.
26. Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. [This special issue]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 47-58.
27. Stanton, N. A., Porter, L.J., & Stroud, R. (2001). Bored with point and click? Theoretical perspectives on designing learning environments. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 175-182.
28. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
29. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. [This special issue]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 5-13.