In vivo electrical conductivity imaging of a canine brain using a 3 T MREIT system

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1145-1155

  Kim, Hyung Joong ^a   Oh, Tong In ^a   Kim, Young Tae ^a   Lee, Byung Il ^a   Woo, Eung Je ^a   Seo, Jin Keun ^b   Lee, Soo Yeol ^a   Kwon, Ohin ^c   Park, Chunjae ^c   Kang, Byeong Teck ^c   Park, Hee Myung ^c  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^c Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Canine brain; Conductivity image; In vivo; MREIT

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MEDICAL IMAGING;

'CURRENT; CANINE BRAIN; CONDUCTIVITY IMAGE; HIGH RESOLUTION; IMAGING EXPERIMENTS; IN-VIVO; IN-VIVO ANIMAL IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY SYSTEMS; WHITE MATTER;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; BRAIN; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOG; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; GRAY MATTER; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IN VIVO STUDY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WHITE MATTER;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 58149295820     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/10/001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Birgul O, Eyuboglu B M and Ider Y Z 2003a Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MREIT and its performance with different probing current performance Phys. Med. Biol. 48 653-71
2. Birgul O, Eyuboglu B M and Ider Y Z 2003b Experimental results for 2D magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using magnetic flux density in one direction Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3485-504
3. Gabriel C, Gabriel S and Corthout E 1996a The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey Phys. Med. Biol. 41 2231-49
4. Gabriel S, Lau R W and Gabriel C 1996b The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz Phys. Med. Biol. 41 2251-69
5. Gao N, Zhu S A and He B A 2006 New magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm: the RSM-MREIT algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity Phys. Med. Biol. 51 3067-83
6. Garosi L S and McConnell J F 2005 Ischaemic stroke in dogs and humans: a comparative review J. Small Anim. Pract. 46 521-9
7. Geddes L A and Baker L E 1967 The specific resistance of biological material: a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist Med. Biol. Eng. 5 271-93
8. Grimnes S and Martinsen O G 2000 Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics (London, UK: Academic)
9. Holder D ed 2005 Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications (Bristol, UK: IOP)
10. Ider Y Z and Birgul O 1998 Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) Elektrik 6 215-25
11. Ider Y Z, Onart S and Lionheart W R B 2003 Uniqueness and reconstruction in magnetic resonance.electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Physiol. Meas. 24 591-604
12. Kang B T et al 2007 Canine model of ischemic stroke with permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion: clinical and histopathological findings J. Vet. Sci. 8 369-76
13. Kim H J, Lee B I, Cho Y, Kim Y T, Kang B T, Park H M, Lee S Y, Seo J K and Woo E J 2007 Conductivity imaging of canine brain using a 3 T MREIT system: postmortem experiments Physiol. Meas. 28 1341-53
14. Kwon O, Woo E J, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49 160-7
15. Latikka J, Kuurne T and Eskola H 2001 Conductivity of living intracranial tissues Phys. Med. Biol. 46 1611-6
16. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K, Lee J Y and Baek W S 2003 Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes Phys. Med. Biol. 48 1971-86
17. Lee B I, Lee S H, Kim T S, Kwon O, Woo E J and Seo J K 2005 Harmonic decomposition in PDE-based denoising technique for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52 1912-20
18. Lee B I, Park C, Pyo H C, Kwon O and Woo E J 2006a Optimization of current injection pulse width in MREIT Physiol. Meas. 28 N1-7
19. Lee B I, Park C, Pyo H C, Kwon O and Woo E J 2006b Phase artifact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Phys. Med. Biol. 51 5277-88
20. Metherall P, Barber D C, Smallwood R H and Brown B H 1996 Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography Nature 380 509-12
21. Muftuler L T, Hamamura M J, Birgul O and Nalcioglu O 2004 Resolution and contrast in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) and its application to cancer imaging Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 3 599-609
22. Muftuler L T, Hamamura M J, Birgul O and Nalcioglu O 2006 In vivo MRI electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) of tumors Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 5 381-7
23. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3101-16
24. Oh S H, Lee B I, Park T S, Lee S Y, Woo E J, Cho M H, Kwon O and Seo J K 2004 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at 3 Tesla field strength Magn. Reson. Med. 51 1292-6
25. Oh S H, Lee B I, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Kim T S, Kwon O and Seo J K 2005 Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT Physiol. Meas. 26 S279-88
26. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Physiol. Meas. 25 257-69
27. z decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 388-94
28. Park C, Lee B I, Kwon O and Woo E J 2006 Measurement of induced magnetic flux density using injection current nonlinear encoding (ICNE) in MREIT Physiol. Meas. 28 117-27
29. Park C, Lee B I and Kwon O 2007 Analysis of recoverable current from one component of magnetic flux density in MREIT and MRCDI Phys. Med. Biol. 52 3001-13
30. Pruessmann K P, Weiger M, Scheidegger M B and Boesiger P 1999 SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 42 952-62
31. Purdy P D, Devous M D, White C L, Batjer H H, Samson D S, Brewer K and Hodges K 1989 Reversible middle cerebral artery embolization in dogs without intracranial surgery Stroke 20 1368-76
32. Sadleir R et al 2005 Noise analysis in MREIT at 3 and 11 Tesla field strength Physiol. Meas. 26 875-84
33. Sadleir R, Grant S, Zhang S U, Oh S H, Lee B I and Woo E J 2006 High field MREIT: setup and tissue phantom imaging at 11 T Physiol. Meas. 27 S261-70
34. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Henkelman R M 1991 Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 10 362-74
35. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Hankelman R M 1992 Sensitivity of magnetic resonance current density imaging J. Magn. Reson. 97 235-54
36. Seo J K, Yoon J R, Woo E J and Kwon O 2003 Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 1121-4
37. Sodickson D K and Manning W J 1997 Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays Magn. Reson. Med. 38 591-603
38. Webster J G 1990 Electrical Impedance Tomography (Bristol, UK: Adam Hilger)
39. Woo E J, Lee S Y and Mun C W 1994 Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance Proc. SPIE 2299 377-85
40. Zhang N 1992 Electrical impedance tomography based on current density imaging MS Thesis Dept. of Elec. Eng., Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, Canada