Analysis of recoverable current from one component of magnetic flux density in MREIT and MRCDI

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 3001-3013

  Park, Chunjae ^a   Lee, Byung Il ^b   Kwon, Oh In ^a  

^a Konkuk University   (South Korea)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CURRENT DENSITY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC FLUX; TISSUE; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

CONDUCTIVITY DISTRIBUTION; FLUX DENSITY; ISOTROPIC CONDUCTIVITY; RECOVERABLE CURRENTS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CURRENT DENSITY IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANISOTROPY; BIOPHYSICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 34249051116     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/11/005     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alessandrini G, Isakow V and Powell J 1995 Local uniqueness in the inverse problem with one measurement Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 347 3031-41
2. Alessandrini G and Magnanini R 1992 The index of isolated critical points and solutions of elliptic equations in the plane Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 19 567-89
3. Birgul O, Eyuboglu B M and Ider Y Z 2003 Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns Phys. Med. Biol. 48 653-71
4. Birgul O, Hamamura M J, Muftuler L T and Nalcioglu O 2006 Contrast and spatial resolution in MREIT using low amplitude current Phys. Med. Biol. 51 5035-50
5. Eyuboglu M, Birgul O and Ider Y Z 2001 A dual modality system for high resolution: true conductivity imaging Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Electrical Bioimpedance (ICEBI) pp 409-13
6. Eyuboglu M, Reddy R and Leigh J S 1999 Imaging electrical current density using nuclear magnetic resonance Elektrik 6 201-14
7. Gamba H R, Bayford D and Holder D 1999 Measurement of electrical current density distribution in a simple head phantom with magnetic resonance imaging Phys. Med. Biol. 44 281-91
8. Gao N, Zhu S A and He B A 2006 New magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm: the RSM-MREIT algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity Phys. Med. Biol. 51 3067-83
9. Ghiglia D C and Pritt M D 1998 Two-Dimensional Phase Unwrapping: Theory, Algorithms and Software (New York: Wiley Interscience)
10. Girault V and Raviart P A 1986 Finite Element Methods for the Navier Stokes Equations (SCM 5) (Berlin: Springer)
11. Hamamura M J, Muftuler L T, Birgul O and Nalcioglu O 2006 Measurement of ion diffusion using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Phys. Med. Biol. 51 2753-62
12. Holder D (ed) 2005 Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications (Bristol: IOP)
13. Ider Y Z and Birgul O 1998 Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) Elektrik 6 215-25
14. Ider Y Z and Onart S 2004 Algebraic reconstruction for 3D MR-EIT using one component of magnetic flux density Physiol. Meas. 25 281-94
15. Joy M L 2004 MR current density and conductivity imaging: the state of the art Proc. 26th Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS (San Francisco, CA) pp 5315-9
16. Joy M L G, Scott G C and Henkelman R M 1989 In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging Magn. Reson. Imaging 7 89-94
17. Khang H S, Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 695-702
18. Kim S W, Kwon O, Seo J K and Yoon J R 2002 On a nonlinear partial differential equation arising in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography SIAM J. Math. Anal. 34 511-26
19. Kim Y J, Kwon O, Seo J K and Woo E J 2003 Uniqueness and convergence of conductivity image reconstruction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Inverse Problems 19 1213-25
20. Kwon O, Woo E J, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48 160-7
21. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K, Lee J Y and Baek W S 2003 Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes Phys. Med. Biol. 48 1971-86
22. Lee B I, Lee S H, Kim T S, Kwon O, Woo E J and Seo J K 2005 Harmonic decomposition in PDE-based denoising technique for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52 1912-20
23. Lee J Y 2004 A reconstruction formula and uniqueness of conductivity in MREIT using two internal current distributions Inverse Problems 20 847-58
24. Muftuler L, Hamamura M, Birgul O and Nalcioglu O 2004 Resolution and contrast in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) and its application to cancer imaging Technol. Cancer Res. Treatment 3 599-609
25. Oh S H, Lee B I, Park T S, Lee S Y, Woo E J, Cho M H, Kwon O and Seo J K 2004 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at 3 Tesla field strength Mag. Reson. Med. 51 1292-6
26. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3101-16
27. Oh S H, Lee B I, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Kim T S, Kwon O and Seo J K 2005 Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT Physiol. Meas. 26 S279-88
28. z decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 388-94
29. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Physiol. Meas. 25 257-69
30. Pyo H C, Kwon O, Seo J K and Woo E J 2005 Identification of current density distribution in electrically conducting subject with anisotropic conductivity distribution Phys. Med. Biol. 50 3183-96
31. Sadleir R et al 2005 Noise analysis in MREIT at 3 and 11 T field strength Physiol. Meas. 26 875-84
32. Scott G C 1993 NMR imaging of current density and magnetic fields PhD Thesis Department of Elec. Eng., University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
33. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Henkelman R M 1991 Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10 362-74
34. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Hankelman R M 1992 Sensitivity of magnetic resonance current density imaging J. Magn. Reson. 97 235-54
35. Seo J K, Kwon O, Lee B I and Woo E J 2003a Reconstruction of current density distributions in axially symmetric cylindrical sections using one component of magnetic flux density: computer simulation study Physiol. Meas. 24 565-77
36. Seo J K, Pyo H C, Park C J, Kwon O and Woo E J 2004 Image reconstruction of anisotropic conductivity tensor distribution in MREIT: computer simulation study Phys. Med. Biol. 49 4371-82
37. Seo J K, Yoon J R, Woo E J and Kwon O 2003b Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 1121-4
38. Woo E J, Lee S Y and Mun C W 1994 Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance Proc. SPIE 2299 377-85
39. Woo E J, Seo J K and Lee S Y 2005 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications ed D Holder (Bristol: IOP)
40. Zhang N 1992 Electrical impedance tomography based on current density imaging MS Thesis Department of Elec. Eng., University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada