Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Suk, Hoon Oh ^a   Byung, Il Lee ^a   Eung, Je Woo ^a   Soo, Yeol Lee ^a   Kim, Tae Seong ^a   Kwon, Ohin ^b   Jin, Keun Seo ^c  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^b Konkuk University   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biological tissue; Conductivity image; Magnetic flux density; MREIT

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SCANNING; TISSUE;

BIOLOGICAL TISSUES; CHICKEN BREAST; CONDUCTIVITY IMAGE; CROSS-SECTIONAL CONDUCTIVITY; CYLINDRICAL PHANTOMS; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHIES; PHANTOMS; PORCINE MUSCLES; TISSUE PHANTOM;

PHANTOMS;

AGAR; GELATIN; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL TISSUE; BREAST; CHICKEN; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; DENSITY; DEVICE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRODE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LIVER; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; MUSCLE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOFT TISSUE; SWINE; TONGUE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY CONSTITUTION; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMPEDANCE; IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY; VALIDATION STUDY;

BOVINAE; SUIDAE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BODY CONSTITUTION; CATTLE; CHICKENS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 23044508481     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 09673334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/026     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Birgul O, Eyuboglu B M and Ider Y Z 2003 Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns Phys. Med. Biol. 48 653-71
2. Boone K, Barber D and Brown B 1997 Imaging with electricity: report of the European concerted action on impedance tomography J. Med. Eng. Technol. 21 201-32
3. Hasanov K F, Ma A W, Yoon R S, Nachman A I and Joy M L 2004 A new approach to current density impedance imaging Proc. 26th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS (San Francisco, CA, USA) pp 1321-4
4. Ider Y Z and Birgul O 1998 Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) Elektrik 6 215-25
5. Ider Y Z and Onart S 2004 Algebraic reconstruction for 3D MR-EIT using one component of magnetic flux density Physiol. Meas. 25 281-94
6. Ider Y Z, Onart S and Lionheart W R B 2003 Uniqueness and reconstruction in magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) Physiol. Meas. 24 591-604
7. Joy M L 2004 MR current density and conductivity imaging: the state of the art Proc. 26th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS (San Francisco, CA, USA) pp 5315-9
8. Khang H S, Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 695-702
9. Kim T S, Lee B I, Lee S H, Seo J K, Kwon O and Woo E J 2004 Diffusion PDE-based denoising technique for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Proc. 26th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS (San Francisco, CA, USA) pp 1036-9
10. Kwon O, Woo E J, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48 160-7
11. Lazeyras F, Zimine I, Blanke O, Perrig S H and Seeck M 2001 Functional MRI with simultaneous EEG recording: feasibility and application to motor and visual activation J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13 943-8
12. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K and Baek W S 2003a Static resistivity image of a cubic saline phantom in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Physiol. Meas. 24 579-89
13. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K, Lee J Y and Baek W S 2003b Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes Phys. Med. Biol. 48 1971-86
14. Oh S H, Lee B I, Park T S, Lee S Y, Woo E J, Cho M H, Kwon O and Seo J K 2004 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at 3 Tesla field strength Mag. Reson. Med. 51 1292-6
15. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3101-16
16. z decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 388-94
17. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Physiol. Meas. 25 257-69
18. Saulnier G J, Blue R S, Newell J C, Isaacson D and Edic P M 2001 Electrical impedance tomography IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18 31-43
19. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Henkelman R M 1991 Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10 362-74
20. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Hankelman R M 1992 Sensitivity of magnetic resonance current density imaging J. Magn. Reson. 97 235-54
21. Seo J K, Kwon O, Lee B I and Woo E J 2003a Reconstruction of current density distributions in axially symmetric cylindrical sections using one component of magnetic flux density: computer simulation study Physiol. Meas. 24 565-77
22. Seo J K, Pyo H C, Park C J, Kwon O and Woo E J 2004 Image reconstruction of anisotropic conductivity tensor distribution in MREIT: computer simulation study Phys. Med. Biol. 49 4371-82
23. Seo J K, Yoon J R, Woo E J and Kwon O 2003b Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 1121-4
24. Sersa I, Beravs K, Dodd N J F, Zhao S, Miklavcic D and Demsar F 1997 Electric current density imaging of mice tumors Magn. Reson. Med. 37 404-9
25. Webster J G (ed) 1990 Electrical Impedance Tomography (Bristol, UK: Adam Hilger)
26. Woo E J, Lee S Y and Mun C W 1994 Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance SPIE 2299 377-85
27. Woo E J, Lee S Y, Seo J K, Kwon O, Oh S H and Lee B I 2004 Conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms using a 3.0 Tesla MREIT system Proc. 26th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS (San Francisco, CA, USA) pp 1287-9
28. Zhang N 1992 Electrical impedance tomography based on current density imaging MS Thesis Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada