Optimization of current injection pulse width in MREIT

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Lee, Byung Il ^a   Park, Chunjae ^a   Pyo, Hyun Chan ^a   Kwon, Ohin ^b   Woo, Eung Je ^a  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^b Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conductivity image; Current injection pulse width; Magnetic flux density; MREIT

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

ACQUISITION TIME; CONDUCTIVITY IMAGE; CURRENT INJECTION PULSE WIDTH; CURRENT INJECTIONS; ELECTRICAL CURRENT; INJECTION PULSE WIDTH; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHIES; NOISE LEVELS; OPTIMAL CURRENT; OPTIMISATIONS;

DATA ACQUISITION;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAGNETIC FIELD; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; IMPEDANCE; INJECTION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY;

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; INJECTIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 34247508725     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/1/N01     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Birgul O, Eyuboglu B M and Ider Y Z 2003 Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns Phys. Med. Biol. 48 653-71
2. Eyuboglu M, Birgul O and Ider Y Z 2001 A dual modality system for high-resolution true conductivity imaging Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Electrical Bioimpedance (ICEBI) pp 409-13
3. Haacke E M, Brown R W, Thompson M R and Venkatesan R 1999 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design (New York: Wiley)
4. Ider Y Z and Birgul O 1998 Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) Elektrik 6 215-25
5. Ider Y Z and Onart S 2004 Algebraic reconstruction for 3D MR-EIT using one component of magnetic flux density Physiol. Meas. 25 281-94
6. Joy M L G, Scott G C and Henkelman R M 1989 In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging Magn. Reson. Imaging 7 89-94
7. Kwon O, Woo E J, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48 160-7
8. Lee B I, Lee S H, Kim T S, Kwon O, Woo E J and Seo J K 2005 Harmonic decomposition in PDE-based denoising technique for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52 1912-20
9. Muftuler L, Hamamura M, Birgul O and Nalcioglu O 2004 Resolution and contrast in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) and its application to cancer imaging Tech. Cancer Res. Treat. 3 599-609
10. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3101-16
11. Oh S H, Lee B I, Park T S, Lee S Y, Woo E J, Cho M H, Kwon O and Seo J K 2004 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at 3 Tesla field strength Magn. Reson. Med. 51 1292-6
12. Oh S H, Lee B I, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Kim T S, Kwon O and Seo J K 2005 Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT Physiol. Meas. 26 279-88
13. z decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 388-94
14. Sadleir R et al 2005 Noise analysis in MREIT at 3 and 11 Tesla field strength Physiol. Meas. 26 875-84
15. Sadleir R, Grant S, Zhang S U, Oh S H, Lee B I and Woo E J 2006 High field MREIT: setup and tissue phantom imaging at 11 T Physiol. Meas. 27 S261-70
16. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Henkelman R M 1991 Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10 362-74
17. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Hankelman R M 1992 Sensitivity of magnetic resonance current density imaging J. Magn. Reson. 97 235-54
18. Seo J K, Kwon O, Lee B I and Woo E J 2003a Reconstruction of current density distributions in axially symmetric cylindrical sections using one component of magnetic flux density: computer simulation study Physiol. Meas. 24 565-77
19. Seo J K, Yoon J R, Woo E J and Kwon O 2003b Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 1121-4
20. Seo J K, Pyo H C, Park C J, Kwon O and Woo E J 2004 Image reconstruction of anisotropic conductivity tensor distribution in MREIT: computer simulation study Phys. Med. Biol. 49 4371-82
21. Woo E J, Lee S Y and Mun C W 1994 Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance SPIE 2299 377-85
22. Zhang N 1992 Electrical impedance tomography based on current density imaging MS Thesis Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada