A new magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm: The RSM-MREIT algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 3067-3083

  Gao, Nuo ^a   Zhu, S A ^a   He, Bin ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ERROR CORRECTION; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; PIECEWISE LINEAR TECHNIQUES; TISSUE; TOMOGRAPHY;

HUMAN HEAD CONDUCTIVITY; MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY (MREIT); NONINVASIVE IMAGING;

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN TISSUE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONDUCTANCE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; SKULL;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 33745057882     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/12/005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Birgül Ö, Eyüboglu B M and İder Y Z 2003a Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns Phys. Med. Biol. 48 653-71
2. Birgül Ö, Eyüboglu B M and İder Y Z 2003b Experimental results for 2D magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) using magnetic flux density in one direction Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3485-504
3. Eyübǒlu B M, Birgül Ö and İder Y Z 2001 Dual modality system for high-resolution true conductivity imaging ICEBI: 11th Int. Conf. Electrical Bioimpedance (Oslo, Norway) pp 409-13
4. Eyübǒlu B M, Reddy R and Leigh J S 1998 Imaging electrical current density using nuclear magnetic resonance Elektrik 6 201-14
5. Fu M C 1994 Optimization via simulation: a review Ann. Oper. Res. 53 199-247
6. Gao N, Zhu S A and He B 2005 Estimation of electrical conductivity distribution within the human head from magnetic flux density measurement Phys. Med. Biol. 50 2675-87
7. He B 2004 Modeling and Imaging of Bioelectrical Activity: Principles and Applications (Dordrecht/New York: Kluwer/Plenum)
8. He B 2005 Neural Engineering (Dordrecht/New York: Kluwer/Plenum)
9. He B, Lian J, Spencer K M, Dien J and Donchin E 2001 A cortical potential imaging analysis of the P300 and Novelty P3 components Hum. Brain Mapp. 12 120-30
10. He B, Musha T, Okamoto Y, Homma S, Nakajima Y and Sato T 1987 Electric dipole tracing in the brain by means of the boundary element method and its solution accuracy IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34 406-14
11. He B, Wang Y and Wu D 1999 Estimating cortical potentials from scalp EEG's in a realistically shaped inhomogeneous head model by means of the boundary element method IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 1264-68
12. He B, Zhang Z, Lian J, Sasaki H, Wu S and Towle V L 2002 Boundary element method based cortical potential imaging of somatosensory evoked potentials using subjects' magnetic resonance images Neuroimage 16 564-76
13. İder Y Z and Muftuler L T 1997 Measurement of AC magnetic field distribution using magnetic resonance imaging IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16 617-22
14. İder Y Z and Onart S 2004 Algebraic reconstruction for 3D magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using one component of magnetic flux density Physiol. Meas. 25 281-94
15. IEC Criteria 1973 http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/ standardization/harmstds/reflist.html
16. Joy M L G, Lebedev V P and Gati J S 1999 Imaging of current density and current pathways in rabbit brain during transcranial electrostimulation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 1139-49
17. Joy M, Scott G and Henkelman M 1989 In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging Magn. Reson. Imaging 7 89-94
18. Khang H S, Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 J-Substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) phantom experiments for static resistivity images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 695-702
19. Kim S, Kwon O, Seo J K and Yoon J R 2002 On a nonlinear partial differential equation arising in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography SIAM J. Math. Anal. 34 511-26
20. Kwon O, Woo E J, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-Substitution algorithm IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49 160-7
21. Lai Y, van Drongelen W, Ding L, Hecox K E, Towle V L, Frim D M and He B 2005 In vivo human skull conductivity estimation from simultaneous extra- and intra-cranial electrical potential recordings Clin. Neurophysiol. 116 456-65
22. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K, Lee J Y and Baek W S 2003 Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes Phys. Med. Biol. 48 1971-86
23. Metheral P, Barber D C, Smallwood R H and Brown B H 1996 Three dimensional electrical impedance tomography Nature 380 509-12
24. Myers R H and Montgomery D C 1995 Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (New York: Wiley)
25. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3101-16
26. Oostendorp T F, Delbeke J and Stegeman D F 2000 The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47 1487-92
27. z decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 388-94
28. Park C, Park E J, Woo E J, Kwon O and Seo J K 2004b Static conductivity imaging using variational gradient Bz algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Physiol. Meas. 25 257-69
29. Rush S and Driscoll D A 1969 EEG electrode sensitivity-an application of reciprocity IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 16 15-22
30. Saulnier G J, Blue R S, Newell J C, Isaacson D and Edic P M 2001 Electrical impedance tomography IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 31-43
31. Scott G C, Joy M L, Armstrong R L and Henkelman R M 1992 Sensitivity of magnetic-resonance current-density imaging J. Magn. Reson. 97 235-54
32. Silvester P P and Ferrari R L 1996 Finite Element for Electrical Engineers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
33. Walters F H, Parker L R, Morgan S L and Deming S N 1991 Sequential Simplex Optimization (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press)
34. Woo E J, Lee S Y and Mun C W 1994 Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance Proc. SPIE 2299 377-85
35. Youn B D and Choi K K 2004 A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization Comput. Struct. 82 241-56
36. Zhang N 1992 Electrical impedance tomography based on current density imaging MSc Thesis University of Toronto