Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 653-671

  Birgül, Özlem ^a   Eyüboǧlu, B Murat ^a   Ider, Y Ziya ^b  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRENT DENSITY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FLUX;

PHASE IMAGES;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NOISE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; REVIEW; SIMULATION; THORAX;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0037423909     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/5/307     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Ahlfors S and Ilmoniemi R 1992 Magnetic imaging of conductivity Proc. IEEE EMBS Conf. pp 1717-8
2. Birgül Ö, Eyüboǧlu B M and Ider Y Z 1999 Magnetic resonance-conductivity imaging Proc. IEEE EMBS Conf. (Atlanta, USA) p 1127
3. Birgül Ö, Özbek O, Eyüboǧlu B M and Ider Y Z 2001a Magnetic resonance-conductivity imaging using 0.15 tesla MRI scanner Proc. IEEE EMBS Conf. CD-ROM
4. Birgül Ö, Eyüboǧlu B M and Ider Y Z 2001b New technique for high resolution absolute conductivity imaging using magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) SPIE Phys. Med. Imaging 2 880-8
5. Boone K, Barber D and Brown B 1997 Imaging with electricity: report of the European concerted action on impedance tomography J. Med. Eng. Technol. 21 201-32
6. Cheney M and Isaacson D 1992 Distinguishability in impedance imaging IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39 852-60
7. Eyüboǧlu B M 1988 Development and application of electrical impedance tomography for thoracic imaging PhD Thesis University of Sheffield p 48
8. Eyüboǧlu B M, Birgül Ö and Ider Y Z 2000b Magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT): a new technique for high resolution conductivity imaging 2nd EPSRC Engineering Network Meeting: Biomedical Applications of EIT (University College, London)
9. Eyüboǧlu B M, Birgül Ö and Ider Y Z 2001 A dual modality system for high resolution-true conductivity imaging XI Int. Conf. on Electrical Bio-Impedance (Oslo, Norway) pp 409-13
10. Eyüboǧlu B M, Brown B H and Barber D C 1989 Limitations to sv determination from apt images Proc. IEEE EMBS Conf. (Seattle, USA) pp 442-3
11. Eyüboǧlu B M and Pilkington T C 1993 Comments on distinguishability in electrical impedance tomography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40 1328-30
12. Eyüboǧlu B M, Köksal A and Demirbilek B M 2000a Distinguishability analysis of an induced current EIT system using discrete coils Phys. Med. Biol. 45 1997-2009
13. Eyüboǧlu B M, Reddy R and Leigh J S 1998 Imaging electrical current density using nuclear magnetic resonance Elektrik Turkish J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 6 201-14
14. Eyüboǧlu B M, Reddy R and Leigh J S 2002 Magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography Patent US6,397,095 B1, provisional patent application on 1 Mar 1999
15. Freeston I L and Tozer R C 1995 Impedance imaging using induced currents Physiol. Meas. 16 A257-66
16. Frerichs I 2000 Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in applications related to lung and ventilation: a review of experimental and clinical activities Physiol. Meas. 21 R1-R21
17. Gençer N G, Ider Y Z and Williamson S J 1997 Electrical impedance tomography: Induced-current imaging achieved with a multiple coil system IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43 139-49
18. Gisser D G, Isaacson D and Newell J C 1988 Theory and performance of an adaptive current tomography system Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 9 A35-A41
19. Gonçalves S, de Munck J C, Heethaar R M, Lopes da Silva F H and van Dijk B W 2000 The application of electrical impedance tomography to reduce systematic errors in the eeg inverse problem-a simulation study Physiol. Meas. 21 379-93
20. Ider Y Z and Birgül Ö 1998 Use of magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for electrical impedance tomography (mr-eit) Elektrik Turkish J. Elect. Eng. Comput. Sci. 6 215-25
21. Ider Y Z, Eyüboǧlu B M, Kuzuoǧlu M, Leblebicioǧlu K, Baysal U, Çaǧlar B K and Birgül Ö 1995 A method for comparative evaluation of EIT algorithms using a standard data set Physiol. Meas. 16 A227-36
22. Ider Y Z and Müftüler L T 1995 Use of mri for measuring ac internal currents of eit: a feasibilitity study Proc. IXth Int. Conf. on Electrical Bio-Impedance pp 420-2
23. Ider Y Z and Müftüler L M 1997 Measurement of ac magnetic field distribution using magnetic resonance imaging IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16 617-22
24. Isaacson D 1986 Distinguishability of conductivities by electric current computed tomography IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 5 91-5
25. Khang H S, Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (mreit): phantom experiments for static resistivity images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 695-702
26. Köksal A and Eyüboǧlu B M 1995 Determination of optimum injected current patterns in electrical impedance tomography Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 16 A99-A109
27. Köksal A, Eyüboǧlu B M and Demirbilek M 2002 A quasi-static analysis for a class of induced-current EIT systems using discrete coils IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 688-94
28. Korjenevsky A, Cherepenin V and Sapetsky S 2000 Magnetic induction tomography: experimental realization Physiol. Meas. 21 89-94
29. Kwon O, Lee J-Y and Yoon J R 2002b Equipotential line method for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Inverse Prob. 18 1089-100
30. Kwon O, Woo E J, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002a Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (mreit): Simulation study of j-substitution algorithm IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49 160-67
31. Liang Z P 1996 A model-based method for phase unwrapping IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15 893-7
32. Maudsley A A, Simon H E and Hilal S K 1984 Magnetic field measurement by NMR imaging J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 17 216-20
33. Mikac U, Demsar F, Beravs K and Sersa I 2001 Magnetic resonance imaging of alternating electric currents Magn. Reson. Imaging 19 845-56
34. Morucci J P and Rigaud B 1996 Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine: Part III. Impedance imaging, medical applications Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 24 655-77
35. Özbek O 2002 Imaging current density distribution using 0.15t magnetic resonance tomography MSc Thesis. Middle East Technical University
36. Özbek O, Birgül Ö, Eyüboǧlu B M and Ider Y Z 2001 Imaging electrical current density using 0.15 tesla magnetic resonance imaging system Proc. IEEE EMBS 23th Annual Conf. CD-ROM (Istanbul, Turkey)
37. Özdemir M and Eyüboǧlu B M 2002 Novel fast reconstruction algorithm for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Proc. Biyomut 8th Annual Conf. (CD-ROM) (Istanbul, Turkey)
38. Rigaud B and Morucci J P 1996 Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine: Part III. Impedance imaging, general concepts and hardware Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 24 467-588
39. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Hankelman R M 1991 Measurement of non-uniform current density by magnetic resonance IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10 362-74
40. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Hankelman R M 1992 Sensitivity of magnetic resonance current density imaging J. Magn. Reson. 97 235-54
41. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Hankelman R M 1995 Rotating frame rf current density imaging Magn. Reson. Med. 33 355-69
42. Van Burik M J and Peters M J 2000 Estimation of the electric conductivity from scalp measurements: Feasibility and application to source localization Clin. Neurophysiol. 111 1514-21
43. Wexler A, Fry B and Neuman M R 1985 Impedance-computed tomography algorithm and system Appl. Opt. 24 3985-92
44. Woo E J, Soo Y L and M C W 1994 Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance Proc. SPIE 2299 377-85
45. Zhang 1992 Electrical impedance tomography based on current density imaging MSc Thesis University of Toronto