Static conductivity imaging using variational gradient Bz algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 257-269

  Park, Chunjae ^a   Park, Eun Jae ^b   Wool, Eung Je ^a   Kwon, Ohin ^c   Seo, Jin Keun ^b  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^c Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Conductivity image; EIT; MREIT; Variational Bz

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETISM; SCANNING;

CONDUCTIVITY IMAGE; CONDUCTIVITY IMAGING; EIT; ELECTRICAL CURRENT; HARMONIC B; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHIES; PERFORMANCE; STATIC CONDUCTIVITY; VARIATIONAL BZ;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONDUCTANCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HARMONIC BZ ALGORITHM; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NOISE REDUCTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SKIN ELECTRODE; STATIC CONDUCTIVITY IMAGING; VARIATIONAL GRADIENT BZ ALGORITHM;

EID: 1342311392     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/1/030     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Birgul O, Eyuboglu B M and Ider Y Z 2003 Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns Phys. Med. Biol. 48 653-71
2. Eyuboglu M, Birgul O and Ider Y Z 2001 A dual modality system for high resolution-true conductivity imaging Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Elec. Bioimpedance (ICEBI) pp 409-13
3. Eyuboglu B M, Reddy R and Leigh J S 1999 Magnetic resonance - electrical impedance tomography US Patent US6,397,095B1
4. Ider Y Z and Birgul O 1998 Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) Elektrik 6 215-25
5. Ider Y Z, Onart S and Lionheart W R B 2003 Uniqueness and reconstruction in magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) Physiol. Meas. 24 591-604
6. Khang H S, Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 695-702
7. Kwon O, Lee J Y and Yoon J R 2002a Equipotential line method for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Inv. Prob. 18 1089-100
8. Kwon O, Seo J K, Lee B I and Woo E J 2003 Reconstruction of current density and conductivity distribution using one component of magnetic flux density Proc. 4th Conf. Biomed. Appl. EIT (Manchester, UK) p 48
9. Kwon O, Woo E J, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002b Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49 160-7
10. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K and Baek W S 2003a Static resistivity image of a cubic saline phantom in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Physiol. Meas. 24 579-89
11. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K, Lee J Y and Baek W S 2003b Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes Phys. Med. Biol. 48 1971-86
12. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3101-16
13. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Henkelman R M 1991 Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10 362-74
14. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Henkelman R M 1992 Sensitivity of magnetic-resonance current density imaging J. Mag. Res. 97 235-54
15. Seo J K, Yoon J R, Woo E J and Kwon O 2003 Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 1121-4
16. Shepp L A and Logan B F 1974 The Fourier reconstruction of a head section IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-21 21-43
17. Vogel C R 2002 Computational Methods for Inverse Problems (Philadelphia, PA: SIAM)
18. Woo E J, Lee S Y and Mun C W 1994 Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance SPIE 2299 377-85
19. Zhang N 1992 Electrical impedance tomography based on current density imaging MS Thesis Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada