Moving from outside to inside: High school students' use of apprenticeships as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 677-697

  Richmond, Gail ^a   Kurth, Lori Ann ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040882949     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199908)36:6<677::aid-tea6>3.0.co;2-%23     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, C.W., Holland, J.D., & Palincsar, A.S. (1997). Canonical and sociocultural approaches to research and reform in science education: The story of Juan and his group. Elementary School Journal, 97, 359-383.
2. Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (1996). Emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573-604.
4. Cunningham, C.M. & Helms, J.V. (1998). Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 383-500.
5. Eichinger, D.C., Anderson, C.W., Palincsar, A.S., & David, Y.M. (1991, April). An illustration of the roles of content knowledge, scientific argument and social norms in collaborative problem solving. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
6. Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1992). Students' experience of the curriculum. In Jackson, P.W. (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 465-485). New York: Macmillan.
7. Florio-Ruane, S., & Denyer, J. (1996). Researching communication in educational contexts: Observation and analysis handbook. Unpublished manuscript.
8. Gee, J.P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press.
9. Gee, J.P. (1991). What is literacy? In C. Mitchell & K. Weiler (Eds.), Rewriting literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other (pp. 3-12). New York: Bergin and Garvey.
10. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
11. Goodfield, J. (1991). An imagined world: A story of scientific discovery. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12. Halliday, M.A.K., & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
13. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock.
14. Helms, J.V. (1998). Science - and me: Subject matter and identity in secondary school science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 811-834.
15. Hogan, K. (1988, April). Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
16. Knorr Cetina, K. (1992). Epistemic culture: How scientists make sense. London: Sage.
17. Lamborn, S., Brown, B., Mounts, N., & Steinberg, L. (1992). Putting school in perspective: The influence of family, peers, extracurricular participation, and part-time work on academic engagement. In Newmann, F. (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 153-181). New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Lehtinen, E., Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Olkinuora, R., & Kinnunen, R. (1995). Long-term development of learning activity: Motivational, cognitive, and social interaction. Educational Psychologist, 31, 21-35.
22. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. Richmond, G. (1999, March). Communities as rich resources for development of apprentices' understanding of scientific work. Paper presented at annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
24. Richmond, G., & Neureither, B. (1998). Making a case for cases. American Biology Teacher, 60, 335-342.
25. Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1994). An integrated approach. The Science Teacher, 61, 42-45.
26. Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 839-858.
27. Ritchie, S.M., & Rigano, D.L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 799-815.
28. Rosebery, A.S., Warren, B., & Conant, F.R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 61-94.
29. Roth, W.-M., & Lucas, K. (1997). From "truth" to "invented" reality: A discourse analysis of high school physics students' talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 145-179.
30. Smith, D., & Anderson, C.W. (in press). Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
31. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32. Vellom, P., Anderson, C.W., & Palincsar, A.S. (1993, April). Constructing facts and mediational means in a middle school science classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
33. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (1994, April). "This question is just too, too easy!" Perspectives from the classroom on accountability in science. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.