Knowledge exchange and the opportunities for Marketing Intelligence & Planning

Marketing Intelligence & Planning

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 435-440

  Hughes, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Knowledge sharing; Marketing strategy; Publications

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849123661     PISSN: 02634503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02634500810894299     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ankers, P. and Brennan, R. (2002), “Managerial relevance in academic research: an exploratory study”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 15-21.
2. Bailey, J. and Ford, C. (1996), “Management as science versus management as practice in postgraduate business education”, Business Strategy Review, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 7-12.
3. Baker, S. and Holt, S. (2004), “Making marketers accountable: a failure of marketing education?”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 557-567.
4. Bennis, W.G. and O'Toole, J.T. (2005), “How business schools lost their way”, Harvard Business Review, May, pp. 96-104.
5. Bolton, R. (2005), “Marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought, practice and infrastructure”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, pp. 1-25.
6. Brennan, R. (2004), “Should we worry about an ‘academic-practitioner divide’ in marketing?”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 492-500.
7. Dibb, S. and Simkin, L. (2003), “Marketing educators: addressing implementation in core courses”, Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 11, pp. 3-13.
8. Hansotia, B.J. (2003), “Bridging the research gap between marketing academics and practitioners”, Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 114-120.
9. Hughes, T., Tapp, A. and Hughes, R. (2008), “Achieving effective knowledge exchange in marketing”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 24 Nos 1 / 2, pp. 221-240.
10. Leavitt, H.J. (1989), “Educating our MBAs: on teaching what we haven't taught”, California Management Review, Spring, pp. 38-50.
11. Mentzer, J.T. and Schumann, D.W. (2006), “The theoretical and practical implications of marketing scholarship”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 179-190.
12. Mintzberg, H. (1996), “Musings on management”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 61-67.
13. Ottesen, G.G. and Gronhaug, K. (2004), “Barriers to practical use of academic marketing knowledge”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 520-530.
14. Pfeffer, J. and Fong, C.T. (2002), “The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 78-95.
15. Piercy, N.F. (2002), “Research in marketing: teasing with trivia or risking relevance?”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 350-363.
16. Polonsky, M.J. and Whitelaw, P. (2005), “What are we measuring when we evaluate journals?”, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 189-201.
17. Porter, L.W. and McKibbin, L.E. (1988), Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
18. Shapiro, D.L., Kirkman, B.L. and Courtney, H.G. (2007), “Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 249-266.
19. Starkey, K. and Madan, P. (2001), “Bridging the relevance gap: aligning stakeholders in the future of management research”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 12, pp. 3-26.
20. van de Ven, A.H. and Johnson, P.E. (2006), “Knowledge for theory and practice”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 802-821.
21. WARC (2008), available at: www.warc.com/News/TopNews.asp?ID=23238&Origin= WARCNewsEmail.
22. Webster, F.E., Malter, A.J. and Ganesan, S. (2005), “The decline and dispersion of marketing competence”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp. 35-43.