What are we measuring when we evaluate journals?

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 189-201

  Polonsky, Michael Jay ^a   Whitelaw, Paul ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cross cultural; Journal ranking; Marketing education

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844495448     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475305276842     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ANBAR. 2004. Choosing the outstanding paper. http:// fiordiliji.emeraldlibrary.com/vl=1470316/cl=53/nw=1/rpsv/literaticlub/ whatsnew/2004awards/choose.htm (accessed May 14, 2004).
2. Armstrong, J. Scott. 1995. Publication of research on controversial topics: The early acceptance procedure. International Journal of Forecasting 11:1-4.
3. Armstrong, J. Scott. 2003. Discovery and communication of important marketing findings: Evidence and proposals. Journal of Business Research 56 (1): 69-84.
4. Armstrong, J. Scott, and Tad Sperry. 1994. Business school prestige - Research versus teaching. Interface 24 (2): 13-43.
5. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. AACSB. 2004. Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation, AACSB International. http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/ business/standards01-01-04.pdf (accessed September 2004).
6. Baker, Michael J., and B. Zafer Erdogan. 2000. Who we are and what we do - 2000. Journal of Marketing Management 16 (7): 679-98.
7. Bakir, Aysen, Scott J. Vitell, and Gregory M. Rose. 2000. Publications in major marketing journals: An analysis of scholars and marketing departments. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (2): 99-107.
8. Baumgartner, Hans, and Rik Pieters. 2003. The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and it subareas over time. Journal of Marketing 67 (1): 123-39.
9. Bettencourt, Lance A., and Mark B. Houston. 2001a. The impact of article method type and subject area on article citations and reference diversity in JM, JMR, and JCR. Marketing Letters 12 (4): 327-41.
10. Bettencourt, Lance A., 2001b. Reference diversity in JCR, JM, and JMR: A reexamination and extension of Tellis, Chandy, and Ackerman. (1999). Journal of Consumer Research 28 (2): 313-23.
11. Browne, William G., and Boris W. Becker. 1991. A longitudinal study of marketing journal familiarity and quality. 1991 Summer American Marketing Association Educators Conference, 702-10.
12. Cheng, Louis T. W., Kam C. Chan, and Ricky Y. K. Chan. 2003. Publications in major marketing journals: An analysis of research productivity of Asia-Pacific universities. Journal of Marketing Education 25 (2): 163-76.
13. Chittenden, Lisa, and Ruth Rettie. 2003. An evaluation of e-mail marketing and factors affecting response. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 11 (3): 203-17.
14. Danaher, Peter J., and Richard Starr Jr. 1998. A study of marketing departments in Australasian universities. European Journal of Marketing 32 (9/10): 771-84.
15. Danielsen, Albert L., and Charles D. Delorme Jr. 1976. Some empirical evidence on the variables associated with the ranking of economics journals. Southern Economic Journal 43 (2): 1149-60.
16. DocSig. 2004. Who when where. http://docsig.eci.gsu.eduaccessed (accessed May 2004).
17. Easton, G., and D. M. Easton. 2003. Marketing journals and the research assessment exercise. Journal of Marketing Management 19 (1/2): 5-24.
18. Elmar. 2003. Elmar Digest. http://www.columbia.edu/~pbpl/elmar/toc.html (accessed May 2004).
19. Elmar. 2003. Elmar Digest. http://www.columbia.edu/pbpl/elmar/toc.html (accessed May 2004).
20. Fugate, Douglas L., and Ronald L. Milliman. 1988. Assessing the importance of academic conference attendance outcomes: Discussions and implications. 1988 Summer American Marketing Association Educators Conference, 174-89.
21. Hawes, Jon M., and Bruce Keillor. 2002. Assessing marketing journals: A mission-based approach. Journal of the Academy of Business Education 3 (2): 70-86.
22. Hawkins, Robert G., Lawrence S. Ritter, and Ingo Walter. 1973. What economists think of their journals. Journal of Political Economy 81 (4): 1017-32.
23. Helm, Amanda E., David Hunt, and Mark B. Houston. 2003. Citation frequency of research published in the top three marketing journals: Ranking the impact of articles, scholars, and institutions. 2003 AMA Summer Educators' Conference Proceedings, 198-208.
24. Henthorne, Tony L., Michael S. LaTour, and Tina Loraas. 1998. Publication productivity in three leading U.S. advertising journals: 1989 through 1996. Journal of Advertising 27 (2): 53-63.
25. Herberlein, Thomas A., and Robert Baumgartner. 1978. Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review 43 (4): 447-62.
26. Hetzel, Patrick. 2000. Where are we going? Perceptions of French marketing academics. Journal of Marketing Management 16 (7): 717-44.
27. Hult, G. Tomas M., William T. Neese, and R. Edward Bashaw. 1997. Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education 19 (Spring): 37-52.
28. Jobber, David, and Paul Simpson. 1988. A citation analysis of selected marketing journals. International Journal of Research in Marketing 5:137-42.
29. Kanuk, Leslie, and Conrad Berenson. 1975. Mail survey and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research 12 (4): 440-53.
30. Koojaroenprasit, Narong, Art Weinstein, William C. Johnson, and David O. Remington. 1998. Marketing journal rankings revisited: Research findings and academic implications. Marketing Education Review 8 (1): 95-102.
31. Lilien, Gary L., Arvind Rangaswamy, Gerrit H. van Bruggen, and Berend Wierenga. 2002. Bridging the marketing theory-practice gap with marketing engineering. Journal of Business Research 55 (2): 111-21.
32. Luke, Robert H., and E. Reed Doke. 1987. Marketing journal hierarchies: Faculty perceptions 1986-1987. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 15 (1): 74-78.
33. Mort, Gillian Sullivan, Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, Geoffrey Kiel, and Geoffrey N. Soutar. 2004. Australian and New Zealand senior academics' perceptions of marketing journals. Australasian Marketing Journal 12 (2): 51-61.
34. Neway, J. M., and F. W. Lancaster. 1983. The correlation between pertinence and rate of circulation duplication in multidatabase searches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 34 (4): 292-93.
35. Nobes, Christopher W. 1985. International variations in perceptions of accounting journals. Accounting Review 60 (4): 702-5.
36. Polonsky, Michael Jay. 2004. Journal rankings: Does one size fit all. Australasian Marketing Journal 12 (2): 64-66.
37. Polonsky, Michael Jay, Gary Jones, and Megan Kearsley. 1999. Accessibility: An alternative method of ranking marketing journals? Journal of Marketing Education 21 (4): 181-93.
38. Polonsky, Michael Jay, Biljina Juric, and Gary Mankelow. 2003. Attitudes about work practices, time allocation and publication output: Profiles of U.S. marketing academics. Journal of Marketing Education 25 (4): 218-30.
39. Polonsky, Michael Jay, and Gary Mankelow. 2000. Where are we going? Perceptions of US marketing academics. Journal of Marketing Management 16 (7): 717-43.
40. Polonsky, Michael Jay, and David S. Waller. 1993. Marketing journals and Asia Pacific marketing academics: An exploratory study. Asia-Australia Marketing Journal 1 (1): 61-70.
41. Polonsky, Michael Jay, and Paul Whitelaw. 2004. Exploring multi-dimensional perceptual ranking of marketing journals by North American academics. 2004 Summer American Marketing Association Educators Conference, 13-20.
42. Shugan, Steven M. 2003. Journal rankings: Save the outlets for your research. Marketing Science 22 (4): 437-41.
43. Sinkovics, Rudold R., and Bodo B. Schlegelmilch. 2000. Marketing academics in Austria, Germany and Switzerland: Hulbolt's ideas give way to performance pressure.Journal of Marketing Management 16 (7): 745-60.
44. Straughan, Robert D., and Nancy D. Albers-Miller. 2000. Marketing education research: Credit for the advancement of our own profession? Journal of Marketing Management 16 (7): 793-813.
45. Theoharakis, Vasilis, and Andrew Hirst. 2002. Perceptual differences of marketing journals: A worldwide perspective. Marketing Letters 13 (4): 389-402.
46. Uncles, Mark. 2004. Journal rankings: How much credence should we give them? Australasian Marketing Journal 12 (2): 67-72.
47. Van Fleet, David D., Abagail McWilliams, and Donald S. Siegel. 2000. A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management 26 (5): 839-61.
48. Zinkhan, George M. 2004. Accessing academic research through an e-database: Issues of journal quality and knowledge use. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32 (4): 369-70.
49. Zinkhan, George M., and Thomas W. Leigh. 1999. Assessing the quality ranking of the journal of advertising. 1986-1997. Journal of Advertising 28 (2): 51-70.