Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: A Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review, January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2005

Archives of Dermatology

Volumn 144, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 67-72

  Davis, Mark D P ^a   Scalf, Leigh Ann ^a   Yiannias, James A ^b   Cheng, Janet F ^c   El Azhary, Rokea A ^a   Rohlinger, Audrey L ^a   Farmer, Sara A ^a   Fett, Debra D ^a   Johnson, Janis S ^b   Nordberg Linehan, Diane L ^c   Richardson, Donna M ^a   Schroeter, Arnold L ^a   Connolly, Suzanne M ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CORTICOSTEROID; COSMETIC; FRAGRANCE; GLUE; METAL; PLASTIC; PRESERVATIVE; RUBBER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKIN ALLERGY; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TREND STUDY;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ALLERGENS; CHILD; COHORT STUDIES; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATCH TESTS; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 38549119579     PISSN: 0003987X     EISSN: 0003987X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2007.2     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat. 2003;14(2):59-62.
2. Wetter DA, Davis MD, Yiannias JA, et al. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(3):416-421.
3. Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis. 2004;15(4):176-183.
4. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(6, pt 1):911-918.
5. Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996-1998. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(2):272-273.
6. Albert MR, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez E. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Am J Contact Dermat. 1998;9(4):207-211.
7. Romaguera C, Grimalt F. Statistical and comparative study of 4600 patients tested in Barcelona (1973-1977). Contact Dermatitis. 1980;6(5):309-315.
8. Yiannias JA, el-Azhary RA. Contact Allergen Avoidance Program: a topical skin care product database. Am J Contact Dermat. 2000;11(4):243-247.
9. Larkin A, Rietschel RL. The utility of patch tests using larger screening series of allergens. Am J Contact Dermat. 1998;9(3):142-145.
10. Davis MD, Yiannias JA. Should macular erythema reactions be counted as positive allergic patch-test reactions? Dermatitis. 2006;17(1):12-14.
11. Davis MD, El-Azhary RA, Farmer SA. Results of patch testing to a corticosteroid series: a retrospective review of 1188 patients during 6 years at Mayo Clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56(6):921-927.
12. Davis MD, Cheng JF, Yiannias JA. Patch-testing with dust mite (Dermatophagoides mix): still a high rate of reactivity with 0.1% concentration. Dermatitis. 2005;16(3):147.
13. Thompson TR, Belsito DV. Regional variation in prevalence and etiology of allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat. 2002;13(4):177-182.