Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 162-166

  Machovcova, Alena ^a   Dastychova, E ^b   Kostalova, D ^c   Vojtechovska, A ^d   Reslova, J ^b   Smejkalova, D ^e   Vaneckova, J ^f   Vocilkova, A ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MOTOL   (Czech Republic)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

^e Masaryk Hospital ^*  (Czech Republic)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HRADEC KRALOVE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; European standard series; Most common allergens, patch testing

Indexed keywords

2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; 4 HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID ESTER; 5 CHLORO 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; ALLERGEN; BALSAM PERU; BENZOCAINE; CLIOQUINOL; COBALT CHLORIDE; DICHROMATE POTASSIUM; DISULFIRAM; EPOXY RESIN; FORMALDEHYDE; FRAGRANCE; LANOLIN ALCOHOL; MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE; NEOMYCIN; NICKEL SULFATE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE; QUATERNIUM 15; ROSIN; SESQUITERPENE LACTONE; THIOL DERIVATIVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ATOPIC DERMATITIS; CHILD; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CZECH REPUBLIC; DEVICE; FEMALE; HAIRDRESSER; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; SKIN ALLERGY; STANDARDIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALLERGENS; CHILD; CZECH REPUBLIC; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS;

EID: 24744447196     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00676.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Rycroft R J G, Menné T, Frosch P J, Lepoittevin J-P (eds). Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 3rd edn. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
2. Bruze M, Conde-Salazar L, Goossens A, Kanerva L, White I R. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 241-250.
3. Rietschel R L, Fowler J F Jr. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis, 5th edn. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2001.
4. Vocilkova A, Dastychova E, Dobešová J et al. Analysis of results of standard tests in the Czech Republic. Cs Derm 1995: 70: 3: 125-128.
5. Uter W, Geier J, Schnuch A. The MOAHLFA index in 17 centres of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) over 6 years. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 343-344.
6. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gereller O et al. Risk factors for contact allergy to nickel - result of multifactorial analysis. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 48: 33-38.
7. Lestringant G G, Bener A, Sawaya M, Galadari I H, Frossard P M. Allergic contact dermatitis in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Dermatol 1999: 38: 181-186.
8. Signhal V, Reddy B S. Common contact sensitizers in Delhi. J Dermatol 2000: 27: 440-445.
9. Marks J G Jr, Belsito D V, DeLeo V A et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998: 38: 911-918.
10. Hussain I, Rani Z, Rashid T, Haroon T S. Suitability of the European standard series of patch test allergens in Pakistani patients. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 50-51.
11. Sharma V K, Chakrabarti A. Common contact sensitizers in Chandigarh, India. A study of 200 patients with the European standard series. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 38: 127-131.
12. Monk B E. Patch testing in a British district general hospital. Clin Exp Dermatol 1999: 24: 484-486.
13. Bangha E, Elsner P. Sensitizations to allergens of the European standard series at Department of Dermatology in Zurich 1990-94. Dermatology 1996: 193: 17-21.
14. Akasya-Hillenbrand E, Özkaya-Bayazit E. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 17-23.
15. Lee T Y, Lam T H. Patch testing of 490 patients in Hong Kong. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 35: 23-26.
16. Liu Y Q, Zhao B, Zhuang L H, Fan W X. Patch test reactions to the Chinese standard screening allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 1997: 8: 141-143.
17. Serra-Baldrich E, Lluch M, Valero A, Malet A, Gimenez Camarasa J M. Contact dermatitis: clinical review of 800 patients tested using the standard European series. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1995: 23: 67-72.
18. Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J, Burg G, Braun-Falco O. Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients. Hautarzt 1988: 39: 779-786.
19. Wöhrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Gotz M, Jarisch R. Patch testing in children, adults, and the elderly: influence of age and sex on sensitization patterns. Pediatr Dermatol 2003: 20: 119-123.
20. Lidén C. Legislative and preventive measures related to contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 65-69.
21. Official Announcement of Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic 221/2004, Statutes at large number 221/ 2007, part 73.
22. Marks JG Jr, Elsner P, DeLeo VA. Contact and Occupational Dermatology, 3rd edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2002.