Patch testing with the DKG standard series 2001-2004: Results from the IVDK;Epikutantestung mit der DKG-standardreihe 2001-2004: Ergebnisse des IVDK

Hautarzt

Volumn 56, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1114-1124

  Worm, M ^a   Brasch, J ^b   Geier, J ^c   Uter, W ^d   Schnuch, A ^c  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contact allergens; Patch testing; Positivity ratio; Reaction index; Standard series

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ALLERGEN;

AUSTRIA; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; GERMANY; PATCH TEST; REACTION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SWITZERLAND; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ALLERGENS; AUSTRIA; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; SEX FACTORS; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 28344453781     PISSN: 00178470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00105-005-1050-2     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Brasch J, Henseler T (1992) The reaction index: a parameter to assess the quality of patch test preparations. Contact Dermatitis 27:203-204
2. Brasch J, Geier J, Henseler T (1995) Evaluation of patch test results by use of the reaction index - an analysis of data recorded by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 33:375-380
3. Brasch J, Geier J, Schnuch A (1998) Differenzierte Kontaktallergenlisten dienen der Qualitätsverbesserung. Hautarzt 49:184-191
4. Brasch J, Uter W, Geier J, Schnuch A (2001) Associated positive patch test reactions to standard contact allergens. Am J Contact Dermatitis 12:197-202
5. Bruze M, Conde-Salazar L, Goossens A et al. (1999) Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 41:241-250
6. Calnan CD (1987) The use and abuse of patch tests. In: Maibach HI (ed) "Occupational and industrial dermatology", 2nd edn. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago London, pp 28-31
7. Fiedler HP, Ippen H, Kemper FH et al. (1993) Blaue Liste - Inhaltsstoffe kosmetischer Mittel. Cosmetic ingredients. 2. Aufl. Editio Cantor, Aulendorf
8. Fischer TI, Hansen J, Kreilgard B, Maibach HI (1989) The science of patch test standardization. Imm All Clinics North Am 9:417-434
9. Fregert S (1981) Manual of contact dermatitis. On behalf of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group and the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2nd edn. Munksgaard Publishers, Copenhagen
10. Frosch P, Pirker C, Rastogi SC et al. (2005) Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 52:207-215
11. Geier J, Schnuch A (1995) A comparison of contact allergies among construction and non-construction workers attending contact dermatitis clinics in Germany. Am J Contact Dermatitis 6:86-94
12. Geier J, Schnuch A, Frosch PJ (2000) Contact allergy to dichromate in women. Dermatosen 48:4-10
13. Geier J, Schnuch A, Brasch J, Gefeller O (2000) Patch testing with methyldibromoglutaronitril. Am J Contact Dermatitis 11:207-212 (editorial: 226-227)
14. Geier J, Brasch J, Schnuch A et al. (2002) For the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Lyral has been included in the patch test standard series in Germany. Contact Dermatitis 46:295-297
15. Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A (2003) The positivity ratio - another parameter to assess the diagnostic quality of a patch test preparation. Contact Dermatitis 43:280-282
16. George ND, Srinivas CR, Balachandran C, Shenoi SD (1990) Sensitivity to various ingredients of topical preparations following prolonged use. Contact Dermatitis 23:367-382
17. Hausen BM, Simatupang T, Bruhn G et al. (1995) Identification of new allergenic constituents and proof of evidence for coniferyl benzoate in Balsam of Peru. Am J Contact Derm 6:199-208
18. Hillen U, Pirker C, Jappe U et al. (2005) Erfassung von Spätreaktionen auf die Testzubereitungen Paraphenylendiamin 1% und Epoxidharz 1% der Standardreihe bei diagnostischer Epikutantestung - Multizentrische, prospektive Untersuchung der Deutschen Kontaktallergie-Gruppe (DKG). JDDG 3 [Suppl 1]:S11
19. Johansen JD, Menne T, Christophersen J et al. (2000) Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985-86 and 1997-98, with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies. Br J Dermatol 142:490-495
20. Karlberg AT (1988) Contact allergy to colophony. Chemical identifications of allergens, sensitization experiments and clinical experiences. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl Stockh 139:1-43
21. Klaschka F, Voßmann D (1994) Kontaktallergene. Chemische, klinische und experimentelle Daten (Allergen-Liste). E Schmidt, Berlin
22. Liden C, Carter S (2001) Nickel release from coins. Contact Dermatitis 44:160-165
23. Podmore P, Burrows D, Bingham EA (1984) Prediction of patch test results. Contact Dermatitis 11:283-284
24. Roto B, Sainio H, Reunala T, Laippala P (1996) Addition of ferrous sulfate to cement and risk of chromium dermatitis among construction workers. Contact Dermatitis 34:43-50
25. Scheuer B, von-Bülow V (1998) Liste Inhaltsstoffe 1998/1. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart New York
26. Schnuch A, Uter W, Lehmacher W et al. (1993) Epikutantestung mit der Standardserie - Erste Ergebnisse des Projektes "Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken" (IVDK). Dermatosen 41:60-70
27. Schnuch A (1996) PAFS - Population adjusted frequency of sensitization (I) - influence of sex and age. Contact Dermatitis 34:377-382
28. Schnuch A, Martin V (1997) Der Epikutantest. In: HC Korting, W Sterry (Hrsg) Diagnostische Verfahren in der Dermatologie. Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin, S 99-116
29. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W et al. (1997) National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40.000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 37:200-209
30. Schnuch A, Aberer W, Agathos M et al. (2001) Leitlinien der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (DDG) zur Durchführung des Epikutantests mit Kontaktallergenen. Hautarzt 52:864-866
31. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Gefeller O (2002) Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug-utlilization research (CE-DUR) approach. Contact Dermatitis 47:32-39
32. Schnuch A, Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W (2003) Rückgang der Nickel-Kontaktallergie in den letzten Jahren - eine Folge der "Nickel-Verordnung"? Auswertungen der Daten des IVDK der Jahre 1992-2001. Hautarzt 54:626-632
33. Schnuch A, Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W (2004) Untersuchungen zur Verbreitung umweltbedingter Kontaktallergien mit Schwerpunkt im privaten Bereich. Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, WaBo-Lu Nr. 01/04, S. 1-313 (ISSN 0175-5211)
34. Schnuch A, Geier J, Lessmann H et al. (2004) Kontaktallergene im aktuellen Zeitverlauf. Geschlechtsund altersspezifische Auswertungen der Daten des IVDK der Jahre 1995-2001. Allergo J 13:57-69
35. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J et al. (2004) Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 50:65-76
36. Uter W, Gefeller O, Geier J et al. (2002) Untersuchungen zur Abhängigkeit der Sensibilisierung gegen wichtige Allergene von arbeitsbedingten sowie individuellen Faktoren. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Forschung, Fb 949, Bremerhaven
37. Uter W, Schnuch A, Gefeller O (2004) ESCD working group: European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies. Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data. Contact Dermatitis 51:47-56
38. Wahlberg JE (2001) Patch testing. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 435-468