Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 333-337

  Akyol, Aynur ^a   Boyvat, Ayşe ^a   Peksari, Yavuz ^a   Gürgey, Erbak ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Contact sensitivity; European standard series; Patch test; Turkey

Indexed keywords

BALSAM; COBALT CHLORIDE; CONTACT ALLERGEN; DICHROMATE POTASSIUM; DIMETHYLCARBAMIC ACID 1 ISOPROPYL 3 METHYLPYRAZOL 5 YL ESTER; DISULFIRAM; FRAGRANCE; LANOLIN ALCOHOL; METAL; NEOMYCIN; NICKEL; PRESERVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALLERGIC REACTION; ARTICLE; ATOPY; CHILD; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTACT SENSITIVITY; CONTACT SENSITIZATION; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; SEX DIFFERENCE; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALLERGENS; CHILD; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TURKEY;

EID: 20544476472     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00608.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Guin J D. Practical contact dermatitis. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1995.
2. Hanifin J M, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Dermato-Venereologica Supplement 1980: 92: 44-47.
3. Wahlberg J E. Patch testing. In: Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 3rd edn, Rycroft R J G, Menne T, Frosch P J, Lepoittevin J P (eds). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001:439-468.
4. Garner L A. Contact dermatitis to metals. Dermatol Ther 2004: 17: 321-327.
5. Marks J G Jr, Belsito D V, DeLeo V A et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998-2000. Am J Contact Dermat 2003: 14: 59-62.
6. Sertoli A, Francalanci S, Acciai M C, Gola M. Epidemiological survey of contact dermatitis in Italy (1984-93) by GIRDCA (Gruppe Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti Contatto e Ambientali). Am J Contact Dermat 1999: 10: 18-30.
7. Britton J E, Wilkinson S M, English J S et al. The British standard series of contact dermatitis allergens: validation in clinical practice and value for clinical governance. Br J Dermatol 2003: 148: 259-264.
8. Christensen O B. Nickel dermatitis. Dermatol Clin 1990: 8: 37-40.
9. Bangha E, Elsner P. Sensitization to allergens of the European standard series at the Department of Dermatology in Zurich (1990-94). Dermatology 1996: 193: 17-21.
10. Albert M R, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez E. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General hospital. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1998: 9: 207-211.
11. Wöhrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Götz M, Jarisch R. Patch testing in children, adults, and the elderly. Influence of age and sex on sensitization patterns. Pediatr Dermatol 2003: 20: 119-123.
12. Nielsen Nh, Menne T. Nickel sensitization and ear piercing in an unselected Danish population. Contact dermatitis 1993: 29: 16-21.
13. Larrson-Stymne B, Widstrom L. Ear piercing-a cause of nickel allergy in schoolgirls? Contact dermatitis 1985: 13: 289-293.
14. Mortz C G, Lauritsen J M, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen K E. Nickel sensitization in adolescents and association with ear piercing, use of dental braces and hand eczema. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 2002: 82: 359-364.
15. Goh C L. Common industrial processes and occupational irritants and allergens-an update. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994: 23: 690-698.
16. Bernstein D I. Allergic reactions to workplace allergens. J A M A 1997: 278: 1907-1913.
17. Conde-Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Villegas C, Romero A, Gonzalez M A. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in construction workers. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 226-230.
18. Albert M R, Chang Y, Gonzalez E. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997 Am J Contact Dermat 1999: 10: 219-223.
19. Akasya-Hillenbrand E, Ozkaya-Bayazit E. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 17-23.
20. Buckley D A, Rycroft R J G, White I R, McFadden J P. The frequency of fragrance allergy in patch tested patients increases with their age. Br J Dermatol 2001: 149: 986-989.
21. Lunder T, Kansky A. Increase in contact allergy to fragrances: patch test results 1989-1998. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 43: 107-109.
22. Katsarou A, Kalogeromitros D, Armenaka M, Koufou V, Davou E, Koumantaki E. Trends in the results to standart allergens over the period 1984-1995. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 245-246.
23. Trattner A, David M. Patch testing with fine fragrances, comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series. Contact dermatitis 2004: 49: 287-289.
24. Stables G I, Forsyth A, Lever R S. Patch testing in children. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 341-344.
25. Roul S, Ducombs G, Taieb A. Usefulness of the European standard series for patch testing in children. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 232-235.
26. Wakelin S H, Smith H, White I R, Rycoft R J G, McFadden J P. A retrospective analysis of contact allergy to lanolin. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145: 28-31.
27. Uter W, Geier J, Pfahlberg A, Effendy I. The spectrum of contact allergy in elderly patients with and without lower leg dermatitis. Dermatology 2002: 204: 266-272.
28. Onder M, Oztas M O. Contact dermatitis in the elderly. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48: 232-233.
29. Cronin E, Bandmann H, Calnan C D et al. Contact dermatitis in the atopic. Acta Derm Venereol 1970: 50: 183-187.
30. De Groot A C. The frequency of contact allergy in atopic patients with dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 22: 273-277.
31. Jones H, Lewis C, McMarlin S. Allergic contact sensitivity in atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1973: 107: 217-222.
32. Giordano-Labadie F, Rance F, Pellegrin F, Bazex J, Dutau G, Schwarze H P. Frequency of contact allergy in children with atopic dermatitis results of a prospective study of 137 cases. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 192-195.