Consumer acceptance of nutrigenomics-based personalised nutrition

British Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 132-144

  Ronteltap, Amber ^a   van Trijp, J C M ^a   Renes, R J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Consumer research; Nutrigenomics; Personalised nutrition; Psychological processes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD PREFERENCE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NUTRIGENOMICS; NUTRITION; PERSONALIZED NUTRITION; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ATTITUDE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DIET; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NUTRIGENOMICS; PILOT PROJECTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 57349122288     PISSN: 00071145     EISSN: 14752662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508992552     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. German JB, Yeretzian C & Watzke HJ (2004) Personalizing foods for health and preference. Food Technol 58, 26-31.
2. Mehrotra I (2004) A perspective on developing and marketing food products to meet individual needs of population segments. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 3, 142-144.
3. Kussman M, Raymond F & Affolter M (2006) OMICS-driven biomarker discovery in nutrition and health. J Biotechnol 124, 758-787.
4. Hesketh J, Wybranska I, Dommels Y, King M, Elliott R & Pico C (2006) Nutrient-gene interactions in benefit-risk analysis. Br J Nutr 95, 1232-1236.
5. Mutch DM, Wahli W & Williamson G (2005) Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics: the emerging faces of nutrition. FASEB J 19, 1602-1616.
6. McPherson JD, Marra M, Hillier L, et al. (2001) A physical map of the human genome. Nature 409, 934-941.
7. Venter JG, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al. (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304-1351.
8. German JB & Watzke HJ (2004) Personalizing foods for health and delight. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 3, 145-151.
9. Joost H-G, Gibney MJ, Cashman KD, Görman U, Hesketh JE, Mueller M, van Ommen B, Williams CM & Mathers JC (2007) Personalised nutrition: status and perspectives. Br J Nutr 98, 26-31.
10. Sutton KH (2007) Considerations for the successful development and launch of personalised nutrigenomic foods. Mutat Res 622, 117-121.
11. van Trijp JCM & Ronteltap A (2007) A marketing and consumer behaviour perspective on personalised nutrition. In Personalized Nutrition: Principles and Applications, pp. 185-204 [FJ Kok, L Bouwman and F Desiere, editors]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
12. Kutz G (2006) Nutrigenetic Testing - Tests Purchased from Four Web Sites Mislead Consumers. United States Government Accountability Office Report no. GAO-06-977T, 27 July. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office.
13. Burgess MM (2003) Starting on the Right Foot: Public Consultation to Inform Issue Definition in Genome Policy. Report no. DEG 002. Vancouver: W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics.
14. Frewer LJ (2003) Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Trends Food Sci Technol 14, 319-332.
15. van Kleef E, van Trijp HCM & Luning P (2005) Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: A critical review of methods and techniques. Food Qual Pref 16, 181-201.
16. Trope Y & Liberman N (2000) Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. J Pers Soc Psychol 79, 876-889.
17. Liberman N & Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 75, 5-18.
18. Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM, Renes RJ & Frewer LJ (2007) Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite 49, 1-17.
19. Vesanen J (2007) What is personalization? A conceptual framework. Eur J Mark 41, 409-418.
20. Oliver D (2005) The Future of Nutrigenomics - From the Lab to the Dining Room. Report no. SR-889. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for the Future.
21. Castle D (2007) The ethics of personalized nutrition. Agro FOOD Ind Hi-Tech 18, 68-70.
22. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
23. Levin IP, Schneider SL & Gaeth GJ (1998) All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 76, 149-188.
24. Einhorn HJ & Hogarth RM (1985) Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psychol Rev 92, 433-461.
25. Dean M & Shepherd R (2007) Effects of information from sources in conflict and in consensus on perceptions of genetically modified food. Food Qual Pref 18, 460-469.
26. Smithson M (1999) Conflict aversion: Preference for ambiguity vs conflict in sources and evidence. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 79, 179-198.
27. Tornatzky LG & Klein KJ (1982) Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manage EM-29, 28-45.
28. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB & Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q 27, 425-478.
29. Lee Y, Kozar KA & Larsen KRT (2003) The Technology Acceptance Model: past, present, and future. Commun AIS 12, 1-50.
30. Deci EL & Ryan RM (2000) The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 11, 227-268.
31. Silvia PJ (2006) Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: Multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion. Eur J Soc Psychol 36, 673-685.
32. Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM & Renes RJ (2007) Expert views on critical success and failure factors for nutrigenomics. Trends Food Sci Technol 18, 189-200.
33. Starr C (1969) Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 165, 1232-1238.
34. Fishbein M & Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35. Rozin P (1999) Food is fundamental, fun, frightening, and far-reaching. Soc Res 66, 9-30.
36. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50, 179-211.
37. Bagozzi RP, Gopinath M & Nyer PU (1999) The role of emotions in marketing. J Acad Market Sci 27, 184-206.
38. Urban GL, Weinberg BD & Hauser JR (1996) Premarket forecasting of really-new products. J Mark 60, 47-60.
39. Green PE & Srinivasan V (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J Mark 54, 3-19.
40. Wittink DR & Cattin P (1989) Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update. J Mark 53, 91-96.
41. Bredahl L (2001) Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods - results of a cross-national survey. J Consum Pol 24, 23-61.
42. Laros FJM (2006) Emotions in consumer research - an application to novel food products. PhD Thesis, Tilburg University.
43. Baron R & Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51, 1173-1182.
44. Wedel M & Kamakura W (2000) Market Segmentation - Conceptual and Methodological Foundations, 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45. Green PE & Schaffer CM (1991) Importance weight effects on self-explicated preference models: Some empirical findings. Adv Consum Res 18, 476-482.
46. Massoud M, Ragozin H, Schmid G & Spalding L (2001) The Future of Nutrition: Consumers Engage with Science. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future.
47. Cain M & Schmid G (2003) From Nutrigenomics Science to Personalised Nutrition: The Market in 2010. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future.
48. International Food Information Foundation (2006) Tailoring Your Diet to Fit Your Genes: A Global Quest. Food Insight Newsletter, January/ February 2006. http://www.ific.org/foodinsight/2006/jf/genesfi106.cfm
49. International Food Information Foundation (2006) Getting Personal with Nutrition. Food Insight Newsletter, November/December 2003. http://www.ific.org/foodinsight/2003/nd/nutritionfi603.cfm
50. Chadwick R (2004) Nutrigenomics, individualism and public health. Proc Nutr Soc 63, 161-166.
51. Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM & Renes RJ (2008) Making nutri-genomics work - integrating- expert stakeholder opinions and consumer preferences. Trends Food Sci Technol (epublication ahead of print version 6 February 2008).
52. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (2006) Statistisch Jaarboek 2006 (Statistical Yearbook 2006). Voorburg/Heerlen, The Netherlands: CBS (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek).