Expert views on critical success and failure factors for nutrigenomics

Trends in Food Science and Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 189-200

  Ronteltap, A ^a   van Trijp, J C M ^a   Renes, R J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; FAILURE ANALYSIS; GENES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MARKETING;

FAILURE FACTORS; HUMAN GENES; NUTRIGENOMICS; NUTRITION DOMAIN;

NUTRIENTS;

EID: 33947189576     PISSN: 09242244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2006.12.007     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Astley S.B., and Elliott R.M. The European Nutrigenomics Organisation: linking genomics, nutrition and health research. (NUGO). Trends in Food Science and Technology 16 (2005) 155-161
2. Barry C.A. Choosing qualitative data analysis software: Atlas/ti and Nudist compared. Sociological Research Online 3 3 (1998) 1-17
3. Burgess M.M. Starting on the right foot: Public consultation to inform issue definition in genome policy. (No. DEG 002) (2003), W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, Vancouver
4. Cain M., and Schmid G. From nutrigenomics science to personalised nutrition: The market in 2010 (2003), Institute for the Future
5. Fogg-Johnson N., and Merolli A. Nutrigenomics - the next wave in nutrition research. Nutraceuticals World (2000) 1-6
6. Frewer L.J. Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Trends in Food Science and Technology 14 5-8 (2003) 319-332
7. Frewer L.J., Howard C., Hedderley D., and Shepherd R. Reactions to information about genetic engineering: impact of source characteristics, perceived personal relevance, and persuasiveness. Public Understanding of Science 8 (1999) 35-50
8. Frewer L.J., Howard C., and Shepherd R. Understanding public attitudes to technology. Journal of Risk Research 1 3 (1998) 221-235
9. Frewer L.J., Miles S., and Marsh R. The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis 22 (2002) 701-711
10. Gaskell G., Allum N., Bauer M., Durant J., Allansdottir A., Bonfadelli H., et al. Biotechnology and the European public. Nature Biotechnology 18 9 (2000) 935-938
11. German J.B., Yeretzian C., and Watzke H.J. Personalizing foods for health and preference. Food Technology 58 12 (2004) 26-31
12. Green L.W., and Kreuter M.W. Health program planning: An educational and ecological approach. (4th ed.) (2005), McGraw-Hill, New York
13. Greenhalgh T., Robert G., MacFarlane F., Bate P., and Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly 82 4 (2004) 581-629
14. Gruber H., and Verboven F. The diffusion of mobile telecommunications services in the European Union. European Economic Review 45 (2001) 577-588
15. Henard D.H., and Szymanski D.M. Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research 38 August (2001) 362-375
16. von Hippel E. Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32 7 (1986) 791-804
17. Hirsch J.B., and Evans D. The impact of food on genes. Food Technology 59 (2005) 24-33
18. Holtzman N.A. What role for public health in genetics and vice versa?. Community Genetics 9 (2006) 8-20
19. Jiang P. Segment-based mass customization: an exploration of a new conceptual marketing framework. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 10 3 (2000) 215-226
20. Müller M., and Kersten S. Nutrigenomics: goals and strategies. Nature Reviews. Genetics 4 April 2003 (2003) 315-322
21. Picard R.G. Mobile telephony and broadcasting: are they compatible for consumers?. International Journal of Mobile Communications 3 1 (2005) 19-28
22. Rivers T.J. Progress and technology: their interdependency. Technology in Society 24 (2002) 503-522
23. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations. (4th ed.) (1995), Free Press, New York
24. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations. (5th ed.) (2003), Free Press, New York
25. Ronteltap, A., van Trijp, J. C. M., Renes, R. J., & Frewer L. J. (in press). Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics, Appetite.
26. Saher M., Arvola A., Lindeman M., and Lähteenmäki L. Impressions of functional food consumers. Appetite 42 (2004) 79-89
27. Siegrist M. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis 20 2 (2000) 195-203
28. Tanaka Y. Major psychological factors determining public acceptance of the siting of nuclear facilities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34 6 (2004) 1147-1165
29. van den Daele W. The spectre of coercion: is public health genetics the route to policies of enforced disease prevention?. Community Genetics 9 (2006) 40-49
30. van Trijp, J. C. M., & Ronteltap, A. (in press). A marketing and consumer behaviour perspective on personalized nutrition. In F. J. Kok, L. Bouwman, & F. Desiere (Eds.), Personalized nutrition: Principles and applications (Chapter 14). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
31. Urala N., and Lähteenmäki L. Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004) 793-809
32. Wiegman O., Gutteling J.M., and Cadet B. Perception of nuclear energy and coal in France and the Netherlands. Risk Analysis 15 4 (1995) 513-521