The genetic architecture of fitness in a seed beetle: Assessing the potential for indirect genetic benefits of female choice

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Bilde, T ^a,b   Friberg, U ^a,c   Maklakov, A A ^a,d   Fry, J D ^e   Arnqvist, G ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEETLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SEXUAL SELECTION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HETEROSIS; INHERITANCE; MATE CHOICE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

BRUCHINAE; CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; CROSSES, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; HYBRID VIGOR; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 57249105488     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-295     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Sexual Selection - A Classification of Models. J Maynard Smith, Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives New York: John Wiley & Sons, Bradbury JW, Andersson M, 1987
2. M Andersson, Sexual Selection Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 1994
3. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. MD Jennions M Petrie, Biological Reviews 2000 75 21 64 10.1017/S0006323199005423 10740892
4. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited review. T Tregenza N Wedell, Molecular Ecology 2000 9 1013 1027 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00964.x 10964221
5. Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. JA Zeh DW Zeh, Animal Behaviour 2001 61 1051 1063 10.1006/anbe.2000.1705
6. Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: Polyandry, conflict and incompatibility (Invited article). JA Zeh DW Zeh, Ethology 2003 109 929 950 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00945.x
7. What is genetic quality? J Hunt LF Bussiere MD Jennions R Brooks, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2004 19 329 333 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.035
8. WG Eberhard, Female control : sexual selection by cryptic female choice Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1996
9. The evolution of polyandry I: Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. JA Zeh DW Zeh, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1996 263 1711 1717 10.1098/rspb.1996.0250
10. The evolution of polyandry.2. Post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. JA Zeh DW Zeh, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1997 264 69 75 10.1098/rspb.1997.0010
11. JW Bradbury MB Andersson, Sexual selection: testing the alternatives New York: John Wiley & Sons 1987
12. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. M Kirkpatrick NH Barton, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997 94 1282 1286 9037044 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1282
13. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. D Houle AS Kondrashov, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 2002 269 97 104 10.1098/rspb.2001.1823
14. Good genes and direct selection in evolution of mating preferences. M Kirkpatrick, Evolution 1996 50 2125 2140 10.2307/2410684
15. Genetic compatibility and sexual selection. M Puurtinen T Ketola JS Kotiaho, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2005 20 157 158 10.1016/j.tree.2005. 02.005
16. DS Falconer TFC Mackay, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics London: Longman 1996
17. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. BD Neff TE Pitcher, Molecular Ecology 2005 14 19 38 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02395.x 15643948
18. RA Fisher, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection Oxford: Oxford University Press 1930
19. The Heritability of Fitness - Bad-News for Good Genes. JS Jones, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1987 2 35 38 10.1016/0169-5347(87)90096-6
20. The heritability of fitness. B Charlesworth, Sexual selection: testing the alternatives New York: Wiley, Bradbury JWaA MB, 1987
21. Comparing Evolvability and Variability of Quantitative Traits. D Houle, Genetics 1992 130 195 204 1732160
22. Lifetime Reproductive Success and Heritability - Empirical Support for Fisher Fundamental Theorem. L Gustafsson, American Naturalist 1986 128 761 764 10.1086/284601
23. Natural-Selection and the Heritability of Fitness Components. TA Mousseau DA Roff, Heredity 1987 59 181 197 10.1038/hdy.1987.113 3316130
24. Quantitative Genetics and Fitness - Lessons from Drosophila. DA Roff TA Mousseau, Heredity 1987 58 103 118 10.1038/hdy.1987.15 3818341
25. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics - How Little Do We Know. NH Barton M Turelli, Annual Review of Genetics 1989 23 337 370 2694935
26. Lifetime reproductive success and heritability in nature. J Merila BC Sheldon, American Naturalist 2000 155 301 310 10.1086/303330 10718727
27. On the Low Heritability of Life-History Traits. T Price D Schluter, Evolution 1991 45 853 861 10.2307/2409693
28. Epistasis and dominance: Evidence for differential effects in life-history versus morphological traits. DA Roff K Emerson, Evolution 2006 60 1981 1990 17133855
29. Heritability and Evolvability of Fitness Components in Callosobruchus-Maculatus. FJ Messina, Heredity 1993 71 623 629 10.1038/hdy.1993.187
30. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. L Rowe D Houle, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1996 263 1415 1421 10.1098/rspb.1996.0207
31. Comparing mutational variabilities. D Houle B Morikawa M Lynch, Genetics 1996 143 1467 1483 8807316
32. Heritable Variation in Fitness as a Prerequisite for Adaptive Female Choice - the Effect of Mutation-Selection Balance. WR Rice, Evolution 1988 42 817 820 10.2307/2408873
33. Evolution of the genetic architecture underlying fitness in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. P Armbruster WE Bradshaw CM Holzapfel, Evolution 1997 51 451 458 10.2307/2411117
34. M Lynch B Walsh, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits Sunderland Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates Inc 1998
35. Epistasis and the evolutionary process. JB Wolf ED Brodie III MJ Wade (Eds), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2001
36. Perspective - the Evolution of Fitness. A Burt, Evolution 1995 49 1 8 10.2307/2410288
37. Genetic variation for total fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. K Fowler C Semple NH Barton L Partridge, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1997 264 191 199 10.1098/rspb.1997.0027
38. G Arnqvist L Rowe, Sexual Conflict Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 2005
39. Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population. LEB Kruuk TH Clutton-Brock J Slate JM Pemberton S Brotherstone FE Guinness, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2000 97 698 703 10639142 10.1073/pnas.97.2.698
40. Components of variance underlying fitness in a natural population of the great tit Parus major. RH McCleery RA Pettifor P Armbruster K Meyer BC Sheldon CM Perrins, American Naturalist 2004 164 E62 E72 10.1086/422660 15478083
41. Good genes, genetic compatibility and the evolution of polyandry: use of the diallel cross to address competing hypotheses. TM Ivy, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2007 20 479 487 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01269.x 17305813
42. Phenotypic Plasticity for Life-History Traits in Drosophila-Melanogaster. 3. Effect of the Environment on Genetic-Parameters. MD Gebhardt SC Stearns, Genetical Research 1992 60 87 101 1468647
43. Age-specific patterns of genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster.2. Fecundity and its genetic covariance with age-specific mortality. M Tatar DEI Promislow AA Khazaeli JW Curtsinger, Genetics 1996 143 849 858 8725233
44. Genetic architecture of two fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster: ovariole number and thorax length. M Telonis-Scott LM McIntyre ML Wayne, Genetica 2005 125 211 222 10.1007/s10709-005-8549-4 16247693
45. Quadratic Analyses of Reciprocal Crosses. CC Cockerham BS Weir, Biometrics 1977 33 187 203 10.2307/2529312 843573
46. Estimation of genetic variances and covariances by restricted maximum likelihood using PROC MIXED. JD Fry, Genetic Analysis of Complex Traits using SAS SAS Institute Inc, Saxton A, Cary NC, 2004 11 34
47. Parental effects in a partially self-incompatible herb Campanula rapunculoides L. (Campanulaceae): Influence of variation in the strength of self-incompatibility on seed set and progeny performance. SV Good-Avila AG Stephenson, American Naturalist 2003 161 615 630 10.1086/368290 12776888
48. Scarlet gilia resistance to insect herbivory: the effects of early season browsing, plant apparency, and phytochemistry on patterns of seed fly attack. T Juenger TC Morton RE Miller J Bergelson, Evolutionary Ecology 2005 19 79 101 10.1007/s10682-004-8090-4
49. Variation in seed characters in Nemophila menziesii: Evidence of a genetic basis for maternal effect. DL Byers GAJ Platenkamp RG Shaw, Evolution 1997 51 1445 1456 10.2307/2411197
50. Mating rate and fitness in female bean weevils. G Arnqvist T Nilsson M Katvala, Behavioral Ecology 2005 16 123 127 10.1093/beheco/arh119
51. Genetic variation in male effects on female reproduction and the genetic covariance between the sexes. ME Czesak CW Fox, Evolution 2003 57 1359 1366 12894943
52. Divergence in replicated phylogenies: the evolution of partial post-mating prezygotic isolation in bean weevils. C Fricke G Arnqvist, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2004 17 1345 1354 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00757.x 15525419
53. Female modulation of reproductive rate and its role in postmating prezygotic isolation in Callosobruchus maculatus. C Fricke G Arnqvist N Amaro, Functional Ecology 2006 20 360 368 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01102.x
54. Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition. N Wilson SC Tubman PE Eady GW Robertson, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1997 264 1491 1495 10.1098/rspb.1997.0206
55. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. H Kokko MD Jennions R Brooks, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 2006 37 43 66 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110259
56. Adaptation to a novel host modifies host discrimination by the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. FJ Messina ME Karren, Animal Behaviour 2003 65 501 507 10.1006/anbe.2003.2107
57. Genetic architecture of population differences in oviposition behaviour of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. CW Fox RC Stillwell AR Amarillo ME Czesak FJ Messina, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2004 17 1141 1151 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00719.x 15312086
58. Genetic Variance for Rate of Population Increase in Natural-Populations of Flour Beetles, Tribolium Spp. MJ Wade, Evolution 1991 45 1574 1584 10.2307/2409780
59. Evolution of Oviposition Tactics in Bean Weevil, Callosobruchus-Maculatus (F). R Mitchell, Ecology 1975 56 696 702 10.2307/1935504
60. The Intersexual Genetic Correlation for Lifetime Fitness in the Wild and Its Implications for Sexual Selection. JE Brommer, PLoS ONE 2007 2 e744 17710144 10.1371/journal.pone.0000744
61. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. K Foerster T Coulson BC Sheldon JM Pemberton TH Clutton-Brock LEB Kruuk, Nature 2007 447 1107 1110 10.1038/nature05912 17597758
62. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. AP Moller RV Alatalo, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1999 266 85 91 10.1098/rspb.1999.0607
63. Inbreeding: Its effect on response to selection for pupal weight and the heritable variance in fitness in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. MJ Wade SM Shuster L Stevens, Evolution 1996 50 723 733 10.2307/2410845
64. The benefits of polyandry in the free-spawning polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa. DJ Marshall JP Evans, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2005 18 735 741 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00873.x 15842502
65. Sources of genetic and phenotypic variance in fertilization rates and larval traits in a sea urchin. JP Evans F Garcia-Gonzalez DJ Marshall, Evolution 2007 61 2832 2838 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00227.x 17908250
66. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. AK Chippindale JR Gibson WR Rice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001 98 1671 1675 11172009 10.1073/pnas.041378098
67. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. ML Head J Hunt MD Jennions R Brooks, Plos Biology 2005 3 289 294 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030033
68. DA Roff, Life History Evolution Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates 2002
69. Temperature-specific outcomes of cytoplasmic-nuclear interactions on egg-to-adult development time in seed beetles. DK Dowling KC Abiega G Arnqvist, Evolution 2007 61 194 201 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00016.x 17300438
70. Effects of cytoplasmic genes on sperm viability and sperm morphology in a seed beetle: implications for sperm competition theory? DK Dowling AL Nowostawski G Arnqvist, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2007 20 358 368 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01189.x 17210029
71. Intergenomic epistasis for fitness: Within-population interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genes in Drosophila melanogaster. DK Dowling U Friberg F Hailer G Arnqvist, Genetics 2007 175 235 244 17151264 10.1534/genetics.105.052050
72. Sexually antagonistic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. DM Rand AG Clark LM Kann, Genetics 2001 159 173 187 11560895
73. Wolbachia Endosymbionts Responsible for Various Alterations of Sexuality in Arthropods. F Rousset D Bouchon B Pintureau P Juchault M Solignac, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1992 250 91 98 10.1098/rspb.1992.0135
74. Evolutionary consequences of Wolbachia infections. S Charlat GDD Hurst H Mercot, Trends in Genetics 2003 19 217 223 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00024-6 12683975
75. Evolutionary diversification of the bean beetle genus Callosobruchus (Coleoptera : Bruchidae): traits associated with stored-product pest status. M Tuda J Ronn S Buranapanichpan N Wasano G Arnqvist, Molecular Ecology 2006 15 3541 3551 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03030.x 17032256
76. Maternal and Genetic Influences on Egg Size and Larval Performance in a Seed Beetle (Callosobruchus-Maculatus) - Multigenerational Transmission of a Maternal Effect. CW Fox, Heredity 1994 73 509 517 10.1038/hdy.1994.149
77. Complex genetic architecture of population differences in adult lifespan of a beetle: nonadditive inheritance, gender differences, body size and a large maternal effect. CW Fox ME Czesak WG Wallin, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2004 17 1007 1017 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00752.x 15312073
78. Inheritance of environmental variation in body size: Superparasitism of seeds affects progeny and grandprogeny body size via a nongenetic maternal effect. CW Fox UM Savalli, Evolution 1998 52 172 182 10.2307/2410932
79. Genetic variation in paternal investment in a seed beetle. UM Savalli CW Fox, Animal Behaviour 1998 56 953 961 10.1006/anbe.1998.0853 9790706
80. Transfer of Male Secretions from the Spermatophore to the Female Insect in Caryedon-Serratus (Ol) - Analysis of the Possible Trophic Role of These Secretions. L Boucher J Huignard, Journal of Insect Physiology 1987 33 949 10.1016/0022-1910(87)90007-2
81. Temperature and host species affect nuptial gift size in a seed-feeding beetle. CW Fox RC Stillwell WG Wallin LJ Hitchcock, Functional Ecology 2006 20 1003 1011 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01197.x
82. Interspecific variation in ejaculate allocation and associated effects on female fitness in seed beetles. J Rönn M Katvala G Arnqvist, J Evol Biol 2008 21 2 461 470 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01493.x 18205778
83. Evolution of ejaculates: Patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence in sperm competition traits. LW Simmons JS Kotiaho, Evolution 2002 56 1622 1631 12353755
84. Paternal indirect genetic effects on offspring viability and the benefits of polyandry. F Garcia-Gonzalez LW Simmons, Current Biology 2007 17 32 36 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.054 17208183
85. Male genotype affects female fitness in a paternally investing species. N Wedell, Evolution 2006 60 1638 1645 17017064
86. Dominance Variance - Associations with Selection and Fitness. P Crnokrak DA Roff, Heredity 1995 75 530 540 10.1038/hdy.1995.169
87. On the resolution of the lek paradox. JS Kotiaho NR Lebas M Puurtinen JL Tomkins, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2008 23 1 3 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09. 012
88. The Relative Rates of Evolution of Sex-Chromosomes and Autosomes. B Charlesworth JA Coyne NH Barton, American Naturalist 1987 130 113 146 10.1086/284701
89. The scent of genetic compatibility: Sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. DJ Penn, Ethology 2002 108 1 21 10.1046/j.1439-0310. 2002.00768.x
90. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: The strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. G Arnqvist M Kirkpatrick, American Naturalist 2005 165 S26 S37 10.1086/429350 15795859
91. Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm. JS Kotiaho M Puurtinen, Functional Ecology 2007 21 638 644 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01286.x
92. Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. J Ronn M Katvala G Arnqvist, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007 104 10921 10925 17573531 10.1073/pnas.0701170104
93. The costs of mating and egg production in Callosobruchus seed beetles. J Ronn M Katvala G Arnqvist, Animal Behaviour 2006 72 335 342 10.1016/j.anbehav. 2005.10.024
94. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. T Tregenza N Wedell, Nature 2002 415 71 73 10.1038/415071a 11780118
95. Outbred embryos rescue inbred half-siblings in mixed-paternity broods of live-bearing females. JA Zeh DW Zeh, Nature 2006 439 201 203 10.1038/nature04260 16407952
96. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. H Kokko R Brooks MD Jennions J Morley, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 2003 270 653 664 10.1098/rspb.2002.2235
97. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. JR Gibson AK Chippindale WR Rice, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 2002 269 499 505 10.1098/rspb.2001.1863
98. Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. A Pischedda AK Chippindale, Plos Biology 2006 4 2099 2103 10.1371/journal.pbio. 0040356