Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection

PLoS Biology

Volumn 4, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 2099-2103

  Pischedda, Alison ^a   Chippindale, Adam K ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; PROGENY; SEX CHROMOSOMAL INHERITANCE; SEXUAL SELECTION; X CHROMOSOME; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; CONFLICT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; INHERITANCE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALIA; AVES; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; PAPILIONOIDEA;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MALE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 33751031521     PISSN: 15457885     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040356     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rice WR (1996) Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232-234.
2. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2002) Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787-789.
3. Parker GA (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NB, editors. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. New York: Academic Press. pp. 123-166.
4. Parker GA, Partridge L (1998) Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 353: 261-274.
5. Gavrilets S (2000) Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403: 886-889.
6. Martin OY, Hosken DJ (2003) The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423: 979-982.
7. Rice WR, Chippindale AK (2001) Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J Evol Biol 14: 685-693.
8. Day T, Bonduriansky R (2004) Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 167: 1537-1546.
9. Bonduriansky R, Rowe L (2005) Intralocus sexual conflict and the genetic architecture of sexually dimorphic traits in Prochyliza xanthostoma (Diptera: Piophilidae). Evolution 59: 1965-1975.
10. Chippindale AK, Gibson JR, Rice WR (2001) Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between the sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 1671-1675.
11. Calsbeek R, Sinervo B (2004) Within-clutch variation in offspring sex determined by differences in sire body size: Cryptic mate choice in the wild. J Evol Biol 17: 464-470.
12. Camperio-Ciani A, Corna F, Capiluppi C (2004) Evidence for the maternally inherited factors favouring male homosexuality and promoting female fecundity. Proc R Soc Lond B 721: 217-2221.
13. Delph LF, Gehring JL, Frey FM, Arntz AM, Levri M (2004) Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58: 1936-1946.
14. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA (2004) Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429: 65-67.
15. Rice WR (1984) Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735-742.
16. Gibson JR, Chippindale AK, Rice WR (2002) The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 499-505.
17. Rice WR (1992) Sexually antagonistic genes: Experimental evidence. Science 256: 1436-1439.
18. Rice WR (1998) Male fitness increases when female are eliminated from the gene pool: Implications for the Y chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 6217-6221.
19. Kokko H (2001) Fisherian and "good genes" benefits of mate choice: How (not) to distinguish them. Ecol Lett 4: 322-326.
20. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33-38.
21. Hastings IM (1994) Manifestations of sexual selection may depend on the genetic basis of sex determination. Proc R Soc Lond B 258: 83-87.
22. Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (2003) Genetic biases for showy males: Are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 1089-1094.
23. Kirkpatrick M, Hall DW (2004) Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58: 683-691.
24. Albert AYK, Otto SP (2005) Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism. Science 210: 119-121.
25. Sheldon BC, Andersson S, Griffith SC, Örnborg J, Sedecka J (1999) Ultraviolet color variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402: 874-877.
26. Rathburn MK, Montgomerie R (2005) Offspring sex ratios correlate with pair-male condition in a cooperatively breeding fairy-wren. Behav Ecol 16: 41-47.
27. Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, Evans CA, Gocayne JD, et al. (2000) The genomic sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287: 2185-2195.
28. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 41-47.