The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: The strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females

American Naturalist

Volumn 165, Issue SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  Arnqvist, Göran ^a   Kirkpatrick, Mark ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic compatibility; Good genes; Mate choice; Paternal investment; Polyandry; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EXTRA-PAIR COPULATION; GOOD GENES HYPOTHESIS; LIFE HISTORY THEORY; MATE CHOICE; MONOGAMY; PASSERINE; POLYANDRY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFERENCE PAPER; COPULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SONGBIRD;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COPULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PASSERIFORMES; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

AVES; PASSERIFORMES;

EID: 17644420008     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/429350     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (90)

1. Arnold, K. E., and I. P. F. Owens. 2002. Extra-pair paternity and egg dumping in birds: life history, parental care and the risk of retaliation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1263-1269.
2. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415:787-789.
3. _. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (forthcoming).
4. Bakker, T. C. M., and A. Pomiankowski. 1995. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8:129-171.
5. Birkhead, T. R., and A. P. Møller. 1992. Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, London.
6. Buchanan, G. 2001. Mate choice in the reed bunting. PhD thesis, University of Sunderland.
7. Burke, T., N. B. Davies, M. W. Bruford, and B. J. Hatchwell. 1989. Parental care and mating behavior of polygynandrous dunnocks, Prunella modularis, related to paternity by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 338:249-251.
8. Cameron, E., T. Day, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict and indirect benefits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:1055-1060.
9. Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:41-47.
10. Chippindale, A. K., J. R. Gibson, and W. R. Rice. 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:1671-1675.
11. Chuang-Dobbs, H. C., M. S. Webster, and R. T. Holmes. 2001. Paternity and parental care in the black-throated blue warbler, Dendroica caerulescens. Animal Behaviour 62:83-92.
12. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1991. The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
13. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and G. A. Parker. 1995. Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour 49:1345-1365.
14. Dickinson, J. L. 2003. Male share of provisioning is not influenced by actual or apparent loss of paternity in western bluebirds. Behavioral Ecololgy 14:360-366.
15. Dixon, A., D. Ross, S. L. C. O'Malley, and T. Burke. 1994. Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extra-pair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371:698-700.
16. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Essex.
17. Fisher, R. A. 1952. The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd ed. Dover, New York.
18. Gavrilets, S., G. Arnqvist, and U. Friberg. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:531-539.
19. Gowaty, P. A. 1985. Multiple parentage and apparent monogamy in birds. Pages 11-21 in P. A. Gowaty and D. W. Mock, eds. Avian monogamy. American Ornithologists' Union, AOU Monograph No. 37, Washington, DC.
20. Granbom, M., L. Råberg, and H. G. Smith. 2004. The spatial and temporal repeatability of PHA-responses. Behavioral Ecology, August 11, doi:10.1093/beheco/arh137.
21. Gray, E. M. 1997. Female red-winged blackbirds accrue material benefits from copulating with extra-pair males. Animal Behaviour 53:625-639.
22. Griffith, S. C., and R. Montgomerie. 2003. Why do birds engage in extra-pair copulation? Nature 422:833.
23. Griffith, S. C., I. P. F. Owens, and K. A. Thuman. 2002. Extrapair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology 11:2195-2212.
24. Hartley, I. R., N. B. Davies, B. J. Hatchwell, A. Desrochers, D. Nebel, and T. Burke. 1995. The polygynandrous mating system of the alpine accentor, Prunella collaris. II. Multiple paternity and parental effort. Animal Behaviour 49:789-803.
25. Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1-7.
26. Hunt, J., L. F. Bussiere, M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2004. What is genetic quality? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:329-333.
27. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? a review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews 75:21-64.
28. Kempenaers, B., and B. C. Sheldon. 1996. Why do male birds not discriminate between their own and extra-pair offspring? Animal Behaviour 51:1165-1173.
29. _. 1997. Studying paternity and paternal care: pitfalls and problems. Animal Behaviour 53:423-427.
30. Kempenaers, B., G. R. Verheyen, M. Vanderbroeck, T. Burke, C. Vanbroeckhoven, and A. A. Dhont. 1992. Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494-496.
31. Kempenaers, B., G. R. Verheyren, and A. A. Dhondt. 1997. Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behavioral Ecology 8:481-492.
32. Kempenaers, B., B. Congdon, P. Boag, and R. J. Robertson. 1999. Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis? Behavioral Ecology 10:304-311.
33. Kirkpatrick, M. 1987. The evolutionary forces acting on female mating preferences in polygynous animals. Pages 67-82 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester.
34. _. 1996. Good genes and direct selection in evolution of mating preferences. Evolution 50:2125-2140.
35. Kirkpatrick, M., and N. H. Barton. 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94:1282-1286.
36. Kirkpatrick, M., and D. W. Hall. 2004. Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58:683-691.
37. Kirkpatrick, M., T. Johnson, and N. Barton. 2002. General models of multilocus evolution. Genetics 161:1727-1750.
38. Kisdi, E. 2003. Reinforcement with multiple mating. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:165-166.
39. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, M. D. Jennions, and J. Morley. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:653-664.
40. Krokene, C., K. Rigstad, M. Dale, and J. T. Lifjeld. 1998. The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behavioral Ecology 9:649-656.
41. Lack, D. L. 1968. Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, London.
42. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 78:3721-3725.
43. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
44. Lifjeld, J. T., P. O. Dunn, R. J. Robertson, and P. T. Boag. 1993. Extrapair paternity in monogamous tree swallows. Animal Behaviour 45:213-229.
45. Ligon, J. D. 1999. The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
46. Lindén, M., L. Gustafsson, and T. Pärt. 1992. Selection on fledgling mass in the collared flycatcher and the great tit. Ecology 73:336-343.
47. Lubjuhn, T., E. Curio, S. C. Muth, J. Brün, and J. T. Epplen. 1993. Influence of extra-pair paternity on parental care in great tits (Parus major). Pages 379-385 in S. D. J. Pena, R. Chakraborty, J. T. Epplen, and A. J. Jeffreys, eds. DNA fingerprinting: state of the science. Birkhaüser, Basel.
48. Lubjuhn, T., S. Strohbach, J. Brun, T. Gerken, and J. T. Epplen. 1999a. Extra-pair paternity in great tits (Parus major): a long term study. Behaviour 136:1157-1172.
49. Lubjuhn, T., T. Gerken, J. Brun, and J. T. Epplen. 1999b. High frequency of extra-pair paternity in the coal tit. Journal of Avian Biology 30:229-233.
50. McKinney, F., and S. Evarts. 1998. Sexual coercion in waterfowl and other birds. Pages 163-195 in P. G. Parker and N. T. Burley, eds. Avian reproductive tactics: female and male perspectives. Allen, Lawrence, KS.
51. Mead, L. S., and S. J. Arnold. 2004. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:264-271.
52. Møller, A. P. 2000. Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behavioral Ecology 11:161-168.
53. Møller, A. P., and R. V. Alatalo. 1999. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266:85-91.
54. Møller, A. P., and M. D. Jennions. 2001. How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88:401-415.
55. Møller, A. P., and P. Ninni. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:345-358.
56. Møller, A. P., and H. Tegelström. 1997. Extra-pair paternity and tail ornamentation in the barn swallow, Hirundo rustica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:353-360.
57. Morrow, E. H., G. Arnqvist, and T. E. Pitcher. 2002. The evolution of infertility: does hatching rate in birds coevolve with female polyandry? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15:702-709.
58. Neudorf, D. L., B. J. M. Stutchbury, and W. H. Piper. 1997. Covert extraterritorial behavior of female hooded warblers. Behavioral Ecology 8:595-600.
59. Neudorf, D. L., D. J. Ziolkowski, V. Nolan, and E. D. Ketterson. 2002. Testosterone manipulation of male attractiveness has no detectable effect on female home-range size and behavior during the fertile period. Ethology 108:713-726.
60. Newton, I., ed. 1989. Lifetime reproduction in birds. Academic Press, London.
61. O'Connor, K. D. 2003. Extra-pair mating and effective population size in the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). MS thesis. Department of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
62. Palmer, A. R. 1999. Detecting publication bias in meta-analyses: a case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. American Naturalist 154:220-233.
63. Parker, G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pages 123-166 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
64. _. 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. Pages 1-60 in R. L. Smith, ed. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
65. Peterson, K. A., K. J. Thusius, L. A. Whittingham, and P. O. Dunn. 2001. Allocation of male parental care in relation to paternity within and among broods of the common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). Ethology 107:573-586.
66. Petrie, M., and B. Kempenaers. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:52-58.
67. Poiani, A., and C. Wilks. 2000. Sexually transmitted diseases: a possible cost of promiscuity in birds? Auk 117:1061-1065.
68. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
69. Schmoll, T., V. Dietrich, W. Winkel, J. T. Epplen, and T. Lubjuhn. 2003. Long-term fitness consequences of female extra-pair matings in a socially monogamous passerine. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:259-264.
70. Shadish, W. R., and C. K. Haddock. 1994. Combining estimates of effect size. Pages 261-281 in H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges, eds. The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
71. Sheldon, B. C. 1994. Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 257:25-30.
72. _. 2002. Relating paternity to paternal care. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 357:341-350.
73. Sheldon, B. C., and H. Ellegren. 1999. Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers. Animal Behaviour 57:285-298.
74. Sheldon, B. C., J. Merilä, A. Qvarnström, L. Gustafsson, and H. Ellegren. 1997. Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264:297-302.
75. Smith, H. G., and R. Montgomerie. 1992. Male incubation in barn swallows: the influence of nest temperature and sexual selection. Condor 94:750-759.
76. Strchbach, S., E. Curio, A. Bathen, J. T. Epplen, and T. Lubjuhn. 1998. Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the "good genes" hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology 9:388-396.
77. Stutchbury, B. J., J. M. Rhymer, and E. S. Morton. 1994. Extra-pair paternity in hooded warblers. Behavioral Ecology 5:384-392.
78. Thornhill, R., and J. Alcock. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
79. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pages 136-179 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago.
80. Veen, T., T. Borge, S. C. Griffith, G. P. Saetre, S. Bures, L. Gustafsson, and B. C. Sheldon. 2001. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 411:45-50.
81. Wagner, R. H., M. D. Schug, and E. S. Morton. 1996. Confidence of paternity, actual paternity and parental effort by purple martins. Animal Behaviour 52:123-132.
82. Weatherhead, P. J., R. Montgomerie, H. L. Gibbs, and P. T. Boag. 1994. The cost of extra-pair fertilizations to female red-winged blackbirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 258:315-320.
83. Westneat, D. F. 1995. Paternity and paternal behaviour in the red-winged backbird, Agelaius phoeniceus. Animal Behaviour 49:21-35.
84. Westneat, D. F., and I. R. K. Stewart. 2003. Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34:365-396.
85. Westneat, D. F., A. B. Clark, and K. C. Rambo. 1995. Within brood patterns of paternity and paternal behavior in red-winged black-birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37:349-356.
86. Whittingham, L. A., and P. O. Dunn. 2001. Survival of extrapair and within-pair young in tree swallows. Behavioral Ecology 12:496-500.
87. _. 2005. Effects of extra-pair and within-pair reproductive success on the opportunity for selection in birds. Behavioral Ecology 16:138-144.
88. Whittingham, L. A., and J. T. Lifjeld. 1995. High paternal investment in unrelated young: extra-pair paternity and male parental care in house martins. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37:103-108.
89. Wright, J. 1998. Paternity and paternal care. Pages 117-145 in T. R. Birkhead and A. P. Møller, eds. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, New York.
90. Yezerinac, S. M., P. J. Weatherhead, and P. T. Boag. 1996. Cuckoldry and lack of parentage-dependent paternal care in yellow warblers: a cost-benefit approach. Animal Behaviour 52:821-832.