Genetic architecture of population differences in oviposition behaviour of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1141-1151

  Fox, C W ^a   Stillwell, R C ^a   Amarillo S, A R ^a   Czesak, M E ^b   Messina, F J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b VASSAR COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominance; Egg dispersion; Epistasis; Host choice; Joint scaling; Line cross; Number of genes; Oviposition preference

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BEETLE; DOMINANCE; EPISTASIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; HOST SELECTION; OVIPOSITION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BURKINA FASO; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; EGG LAYING; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETICS; INDIA; INHERITANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BEETLES; BURKINA FASO; CROSSES, GENETIC; ENVIRONMENT; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; INDIA; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MODELS, GENETIC; OVIPOSITION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

BRUCHINAE; CALLOSOBRUCHUS; CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS; CHRYSOMELIDAE; COLEOPTERA; INSECTA; PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); VIGNA RADIATA VAR. RADIATA;

EID: 2942530257     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00719.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Agrawal, A.F., Brodie, E.D., Jr & Rieseberg, L.H. 2002. Possible consequences of genes of major effect: transient changes in the G-matrix. Genetica 112/113: 33-43.
2. Allison, P.D. 1995. Survival Analysis Using the SAS® System: A Practical Guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
3. Armbruster, P., Bradshaw, W.E. & Holzapfel, C.M. 1997. Evolution of genetic architecture underlying fitness in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Evolution 51: 451-458.
4. Barron, A.B. 2001. The life and death of Hopkins' host-selection principle. J. Ins. Behav. 14: 725-737.
5. Basford, K.E. & De Lacy, I.H. 1979. The use of matrix specifications in defining gene action in genotypic value models and generation mean analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 55: 225-229.
6. Bieri, J. & Kawecki, T.J. 2003. Genetic architecture of differences between populations of cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) evolved in the same environment. Evolution 57: 274-287.
7. Bradshaw, W.E. & Holzapfel, C.M. 2000. The evolution of genetic architecture and the divergence of natural populations. In: Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie III & M. J. Wade, eds), pp. 245-263. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
8. Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.A. 1998. Model Selection and Inference. Springer Mathematics, New York, NY.
9. Carroll, S.P., Dingle, H., Famula, T.R. & Fox, C.W. 2001. Genetic architecture of adaptive differentiation in evolving host races of the soapberry bug, Jadera haematolma. Genetica 112: 257-272.
10. Carroll, S.P., Dingle, H. & Famula, T.R. 2003. Rapid appearance of epistasis during adaptive divergence following colonization. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 270: S80-S83.
11. Charlesworth, B., Coyne, J.A. & Barton, N.H. 1987. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130: 113-146.
12. Cheverud, J.M. & Routman, E.J. 1995. Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics 139: 1455-1461.
13. Craig, T.P., Horner, J.D. & Itami, J.K. 2001. Genetics, experience, and host-plant preference in Eurosta solidaginis: implications for host shifts and speciation. Evolution 55: 773-782.
14. Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D.A. 1995. Dominance variance: associations with selection and fitness. Heredity 75: 530-540.
15. Czesak, M.E. & Fox, C.W. 2003. Evolutionary ecology of size and number in a seed beetle. Genetic trade-offs differ between environments. Evolution 57: 1121-1132.
16. Dres, M. & Mallet, J. 2002. Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 357: 471-492.
17. Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 2nd edn. Longman, New York, NY.
18. Fenster, C.B. & Galloway, L.F. 2000. In: Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie III & M. J. Wade, eds), pp. 232-244. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
19. Fox, C.W. 1993. A quantitative genetic analysis of oviposition preference and larval performance on two hosts in the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution 47: 166-175.
20. Fox, C.W. 1994. Maternal and genetic influences on egg size and larval performance in a seed beetle: multigenerational transmission of a maternal effect? Heredity 73: 509-517.
21. Fox, C.W. 1998. Genetic and maternal influences on body size and development time in the seed beetle, Stator limbatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91: 128-134.
22. Fox, C.W. & Savalli, U.M. 2000. Maternal effects mediate host expansion in a seed-feeding beetle. Ecology 81: 3-7.
23. Fox, C.W., Bush, M.L., Roff, D.A. & Wallin, W.G. 2004. The evolutionary genetics of lifespan and mortality rates in two populations of the seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus. Heredity 92: 170-181.
24. Gilchrist, A.S. & Partridge, L. 1999. A comparison of the genetic basis of wing size divergence in three parallel body size clines of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 153: 1775-1787.
25. Guldemond, J.A. 1990. Evolutionary genetics of the aphid Cryptomyzus, with a preliminary analysis of the inheritance of host plant preference, reproductive performance and host-alternation. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 57: 65-76.
26. Heath, D.D., Fox, C.W. & Heath, J.W. 1999. Maternal effects on offspring size: variation through early development of chinook salmon. Evolution 53: 1605-1611.
27. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
28. Jaenike, J. 1987. Genetics of oviposition-site preference in Drosophila tripunctata. Heredity 59: 363-369.
29. Jaenike, J. & Holt, R.D. 1991. Genetic variation for habitat preference: evidence and explanation. Am. Nat. 137: S67-S90.
30. Janz, N. 1998. Sex-linked inheritance of host-plant specialization in a polyphagous butterfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 1675-1678.
31. Johnson, N.A. 2000. Speciation: Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities, dominance and gene interactions. TREE 15: 480-482.
32. Kawecki, T.J. & Mery, F. 2003. Evolutionary conservation of geographic variation in host preference in Callosobruchus maculatus. Ecol. Entomol. 28: 449-456.
33. Kearsey, M.J. & Pooni, H.S. 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman & Hall, London.
34. Keese, M.C. 1996. Feeding responses of hybrids and the inheritance of host-use traits in leaf feeding beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Heredity 76: 36-42.
35. Lazarević, J., Peric-Mataruga, V., Ivanović, J. & Andjelković, M. 1998. Host plant effects on the genetic variation and correlations in the individual performance of the gypsy moth. Funct. Ecol. 12: 141-148.
36. Lu, W.H. & Logan, P. 1995. Inheritance of host-related feeding and ovipositional behaviors in Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Envir. Entomol. 24: 278-287.
37. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
38. Mark, G.A. 1981. Anomalous sex-related inheritance of oviposition rate in Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Behav. Gen. 11: 145-151.
39. Mather, K. & Jinks, J.L. 1982. Biometrical Genetics: the Study of Continuous Variation. Chapman & Hall, London.
40. Meffert, L.M. 2000. The evolutionary potential of morphology and mating behavior: the role of epistasis in bottlenecked populations. In: Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie III & M. J. Wade, eds), pp. 177-193. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
41. Meffert, L.M., Hicks. S.K. & Regan, J.L. 2002. Nonadditive genetic effects in animal behavior. Am. Nat. 160: S198-S213.
42. Messina, F.J. 1989. Genetic basis of variable oviposition behavior in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82: 792-796.
43. Messina, F.J. 1991. Life-history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competitive ability. Oecologia 85: 447-455.
44. Messina, F.J. 1993. Heritability and 'evolvability' of fitness components in Callosobruchus maculatus. Heredity 71: 623-629.
45. Messina, F.J. & Karren, M.E. 2003. Adaptation to a novel host modifies host discrimination by the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Anim. Behav. 65: 501-507.
46. Messina, F.J. & Mitchell, R. 1989. Intraspecific variation in egg-spacing behavior of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. J. Insect Behav. 2: 727-741.
47. Messina, F.J. & Slade, A.F. 1997. Inheritance of host-plant choice in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 90: 848-855.
48. Messina, F.J., Gardner, S.L. & Morse, G.E. 1991. Host discrimination by egg-laying seed beetles: causes of population differences. Anim. Behav. 41: 773-780.
49. Mitchell, R. 1991. The traits of a biotype of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) from South India. J. Stored Prod. Res. 27: 221-224.
50. Mousseau, T.A. & Fox, C.W. 1998. Maternal Effects as Adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
51. Price, T. & Schluter, D. 1991. On the low heritability of life-history traits. Evolution 45: 853-861.
52. Radtkey, R.R. & Singer, M.C. 1995. Repeated reversals of host-preference evolution in a specialist insect herbivore. Evolution 49: 351-359.
53. Rice, W.R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735-742.
54. Roff, D.A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
55. Roff, D.A. & Mousseau, T.A. 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58: 103-118.
56. Savalli, U.M., Czesak, M.E. & Fox, C.W. 2000. Paternal investment in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): variation among populations. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 1173-1178.
57. Scriber, J.M., Giebink, B.L. & Snider, D. 1991. Reciprocal latitudinal clines in oviposition behavior of Papilio glaucus and P. canadensis across the great-lakes hybrid zone - possible sex-linkage of oviposition preferences. Oecologia 87: 360-368.
58. Šešlija, D. & Tucíc, N. 2003. Selection for developmental time in bean weevil (Acanthoscelides obtectus): correlated responses for other life history traits and genetic architecture of line differentiation. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 106: 19-35.
59. Sezer, M. & Butlin, R.K. 1998. The genetic basis of oviposition preference differences between sympatric host races of the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 2399-2405.
60. Sheck, A.L. & Gould, F. 1995. Genetic analysis of differences in oviposition preferences of Heliothis virescens and H. subflexa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Envir. Entomol. 24: 341-347.
61. Sheck, A.L. & Gould, F. 1996. The genetic basis of differences in growth and behavior of specialist and generalist herbivore species: selection on hybrids of Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa (Lepidoptera). Evolution 50: 831-841.
62. Singer, M.C. 1986. The definition and measurement of oviposition preference in plant-feeding insects. In: Insect-Plant Relations (J. Miller & T. Miller, eds), pp. 65-94. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
63. Sperling, F.A.H. 1994. Sex-linked genes and species differences in Lepidoptera. Can. Entomol. 126: 807-818.
64. Summerville, K.S., Veech, J.A. & Crist, T.O. 2002. Does variation in patch use among butterfly species contribute to nestedness at fine spatial scales? Oikos 97: 195-204.
65. Thomas, C.D. & Singer, M.C. 1987. Variation in host preference affects movement patterns within a butterfly population. Ecology 68: 1262-1267.
66. Thompson, J.N. 1988. Evolutionary genetics of oviposition preference in swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 42: 1223-1234.
67. Thompson, J.N., Wehling, W. & Podolsky, R. 1990. Evolutionary genetics of host use in swallowtail butterflies. Nature 344: 148-150.
68. Wade, M.J. 2000. Epistasis as a genetic constraint within populations and an accelerant of adaptive divergence among them. In: Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie III & M. J. Wade, eds), pp. 213-231. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
69. Wade, M.J. 2002. A gene's eye view of epistasis, selection and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 337-346.
70. Wolf, J.B., Brodie, E.D. III & Wade, M.J. (eds) 2000. Epistasis and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
71. Zeng, Z.-B. 1992. Correcting the bias of Wright's estimator of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character: a further improved method. Genetics 131: 987-1001.