Male genotype affects female fitness in a paternally investing species

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1638-1645

  Wedell, N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Lifetime fecundity; Longevity; Male manipulation; Pieris napi; Polyandry; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; FECUNDITY; FEMALE; FITNESS; GENOTYPE; MALE; NATURAL SELECTION; PARENTAL INVESTMENT;

HEXAPODA; INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; PIERIDAE; PIERIS BRASSICAE; PIERIS NAPI;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SPERMATOGONIUM;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SPERMATOGONIA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33750591430     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/06-018.1     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Andres, J. A., and G. Arnqvist. 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in house flies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:399-405.
2. Arnqvist, G., and I. Danielsson. 1999. Postmating sexual selection: the effects of male body size and recovery period on paternity and egg production rate in a water strider. Behav. Ecol. 4:358-365.
3. Arnqvist, G., and T. Nilsson. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60:145-164.
4. Attia, F. A., and T. Tregenza. 2004. Divergence revealed by population crosses in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6:927-935.
5. Becker, W. A. 1984. Manual of quantitative genetics. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA.
6. Campbell, I. M. 1962. Reproductive capacity in the genus Choristoneura Led. (Lepidoptera: Torticidae). I. Quantitative inheritance and the genes as controllers of rates. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 4:272-288.
7. Chapman, T., L. F. Liddle, J. M. Kalb, M. F. Wolfner, and L. Partridge. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241-233.
8. Chen, P. S. 1984. The functional morphology and biochemistry of male accessory glands. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29:233-255.
9. Clark, A. G., D. J. Begun, and M. Prout. 1999. Female X male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283:217-220.
10. Cook, P. A., and N. Wedell. 1996. Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: A strategy for maximizing fertilization success? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:1047-1051.
11. _. 1999. Non-fertile sperm delay female remating. Nature 397:486.
12. Czesak, M. E., and C. W. Fox. 2003. Genetic variation in male effects on female reproduction and the genetic covariance between the sexes. Evolution 57:1359-1366.
13. Delisle, J., and M. Hardy. 1997. Male larval nutrition influences the reproductive success of both sexes of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Funct. Ecol. 11:451-463.
14. Eisner, T., and J. Meinwald. 1995. Defense-mechanisms of arthropods. 129. The chemistry of sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:50-55.
15. Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, New York.
16. Fedorka, K. M., and T. A. Mousseau. 2002. Nuptial gifts and the evolution of male body size. Evolution 56:590-596.
17. Forsberg, J., and C. Wiklund. 1989. Mating in the afternoon: time-saving courtship and remating by females of a polyandrous butterfly, Pieris napi. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25:349-356.
18. Fox, C. W. 1993. Multiple mating, lifetime fecundity and female mortality of the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Funct. Ecol. 7:203-208.
19. Fox, C. W., L. A. McLennan, and T. A. Mousseau. 1995. Male body size affects female lifetime reproductive success. Anim. Behav. 50:281-284.
20. Freeman-Gallant, C. R., and M. D. Rothstein. 1999. Apparent heritability of parental care in savannah sparrows. Auk 116:1132-1136.
21. Friberg, U., and G. Arnqvist. 2003. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred male are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females. J. Evol. Biol. 16:797-811.
22. Froman, D. P., T. Pizzari, A. J. Feltman, H. Castillo-Juarez, and T. R. Birkhead. 2002. Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the fowl, Gallus g. domesticus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:607-612.
23. Gwynne, D. T. 1984. Courtship feeding increases female reproductive success in bushcrickets. Nature 307:361-363.
24. Hosken, D. J., T. W. J. Garner, and P. I. Ward. 2001. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr. Biol. 11:489-493.
25. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
26. _. 1998. How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits? Genetica 102/103:241-253.
27. Iyengar, V. H., and T. Eisner. 1999. Heritability of body mass, a sexually selected trait, in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:9169-9171.
28. Kaitala, A., and C. Wiklund. 1995. Female mate choice and mating costs in the polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). J. Insect Behav. 8:355-363.
29. Karlsson, B. 1998. Nuptial gifts, resource budgets, and reproductive output in a polyandrous butterfly. Ecology 78:2931-2940.
30. Kirkpatrick, M., and D. W. Hall. 2004. Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58:683-691.
31. Kotiaho, J. S., L. W. Simmons, J. Hunt, and J. L. Tomkins. 2003. Male influences maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Othophagus taurus. Am. Nat. 161:852-859.
32. LaMunyon, C. W., and T. Eisner. 1994. Spermatophore size as determinant of paternity in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7081-7084.
33. Lindfors, V. 1998. Butterfly life history and mating systems. Ph.D. diss., University of Stockholm, Sweden.
34. Lynch, M., and J. B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
35. MacColl, A. D. C., and B. J. Hatchwell. 2003. Heritability of parental effort in a passerine bird. Evolution 57:2191-2195.
36. Miller, G. T., and S. Pitnick. 2002. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 198:1230-1233.
37. Moore, P. J., W. E. Harris, V. T. Montrose, D. Levin, and A. J. Moore. 2004. Constraints on evolution and postcopulatory sexual selection: trade-offs among ejaculate characteristics. Evolution 58:1773-1780.
38. Morrow, E. H., and M. J. G. Gage. 2001. Artificial selection and heritability of sperm length in Gryllus bimaculatus. Heredity 87:1-7.
39. Mousseau, T. A., and C. W. Fox. 1998. Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
40. Nilsson, T., C. Fricke, and G. Arnqvist. 2002. Patterns of divergence in the effects of mating on female reproductive performance in flour beetles. Evolution 56:111-112.
41. Pitnick, S., and F. García-González. 2002. Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:1821-1828.
42. Pomiankowski, A., and A. P. Møller. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260:21-29.
43. Qvarnström, A., and T. D. Price. 2001. Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:95-100.
44. Reinhold, K. 1999. Paternal investment in Poecilimon veluchianus bushcrickets: beneficial effects of nuptial feeding on offspring viability. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45:293-299.
45. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
46. Roff, D. 1997. Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman and Hall, London.
47. Sakaluk, S. K., and R. L. Smith. 1985. Inheritance of male parental investment in an insect. Am. Nat. 132:594-601.
48. Savalli, U. M., and C. W. Fox. 1998. Genetic variation in paternal investment in a seed beetle. Anim. Behav. 56:953-961.
49. Savalli, U. M., M. E. Czesak, and C. W. Fox. 2000. Paternal investment in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): variation among populations. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93:1173-1178.
50. Sawby, R., and K. A. Hughes. 2001. Male genotype affects female longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 55:834-839.
51. Service, P. M., and R. E. Vossbrink. 1996. Genetic variation in first male effects on egg laying and remating by female Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 26:39-48.
52. Sheldon, B. C. 2000. Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trend Ecol. Evol. 15:397-402.
53. Simmons, L. W., and J. S. Kotiaho. 2002. Evolution of ejaculates: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence in sperm competition traits. Evolution 56:1622-1631.
54. Vahed, K. 1998. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol. Rev. 73:43-78.
55. Ward, P. I. 2000. Sperm length is heritable and sex-linked in yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria). J. Zool. 251:349-353.
56. Wedell, N. 1996. Mate quality affects reproductive effort in a paternally investing species. Am. Nat. 148:1075-1088.
57. _. 1997. Ejaculate size in bushcrickets: the importance of being large. J. Evol. Biol. 10:315-325.
58. _. 2001. Female remating in butterflies: interaction between female genotype and non-fertile sperm. J. Evol. Biol. 14:746-754.
59. Wedell, N., and A. Arak. 1989. The wartbiter spermatophore and its effect on female reproductive output (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Decticus verrucivorus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24:117-125.
60. Wedell, N., and B. Karlsson. 2003. Paternal investment directly affects female reproductive effort in an insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:2065-2071.
61. Wedell, N., C. Wiklund, and P. A. Cook. 2002. Monandry and polyandry as alternative lifestyles in a butterfly. Behav. Ecol. 13:450-455.
62. Weigensberg, I., Y. Carriere, and D. A. Roff. 1998. Effects of male genetic contribution and paternal investment to egg and hatchling size in the cricket, Gryllus firmus. J. Evol. Biol. 11:135-146.
63. Wiklund, C., and J. Forsberg. 1991. Sexual size dimorphism in relation to female polygamy and protandry in butterflies: a comparative study of Swedish Pieridae and Satyridae. Oikos 60:373-381.
64. Wiklund, C., and A. Kaitala. 1995. Sexual selection for large male size in a polyandrous butterfly: the effect of body size on male versus female reproductive success in Pieris napi. Behav. Ecol. 6:6-13.
65. Wiklund, C., A. Kaitala, V. Lindfors, and J. Abenius. 1993. Polyandry and its effect on female reproduction in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi L.). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33:25-33.
66. Wiklund, C., A. Kaitala, and N. Wedell. 1998. Decoupling of reproductive rates and parental expenditure in a polyandrous butterfly. Behav. Ecol. 9:20-25.
67. Will, M. W., and S. K. Sakaluk. 1994. Courtship feeding in decorated crickets: Is the spermatophylax a sham? Anim. Behav. 48:1309-1315.
68. Wolf, J. B., A. J. Moore, and E. D. Brodie III. 1997. The evolution of indicator traits for parental quality: the role of maternal and paternal effects. Am. Nat. 150:639-649.