On the resolution of the lek paradox

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-3

  Kotiaho, Janne S ^a   LeBas, Natasha R ^b   Puurtinen, Mikael ^a   Tomkins, Joseph L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE BEHAVIOR; GENETIC VARIATION; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; SHORT SURVEY;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 37549010249     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.012     Document Type: Short Survey

References (18)

1. Charmantier A., and Sheldon B.C. Testing genetic models of mate choice evolution in the wild. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 (2006) 417-419
2. Kotiaho J.S., and Puurtinen M. Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm. Funct. Ecol. 21 (2007) 638-644
3. Tomkins J.L., et al. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 (2004) 323-328
4. Pomiankowski A., and Møller A.P. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 260 (1995) 21-29
5. Rowe L., and Houle D. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 263 (1996) 1415-1421
6. Kotiaho J.S., et al. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410 (2001) 684-686
7. Hoffman J.I., et al. Female fur seals show active choice for males that are heterozygous and unrelated. Nature 445 (2007) 912-914
8. Petrie M., and Roberts G. Sexual selection and the evolution of evolvability. Heredity 98 (2007) 198-205
9. Miller C.W., and Moore A.J. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 274 (2007) 1279-1286
10. Reid J.M. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 274 (2007) 1395-1402
11. Reid J.M., et al. Intrinsic parent-offspring correlation in inbreeding level in a song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population open to immigration. Am. Nat. 168 (2006) 1-13
12. Proulx S.R. Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 55 (2001) 2401-2411
13. Reinhold K. Modeling a version of the good-genes hypothesis: female choice of locally adapted males. Org. Divers. Evol. 4 (2004) 157-163
14. Cotton S., and Pomiankowski A. Sexually selected mutation rates. Heredity 98 (2007) 185-186
15. Ritchie M. What is 'the paradox of the lek'?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 (1996) 175
16. Reynolds J.D., and Gross M.R. Costs and benefits of female mate choice - is there a lek paradox?. Am. Nat. 136 (1990) 230-243
17. Borgia G. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum M.S., and Blum N.A. (Eds). Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition (1979), Academic Press 19-80
18. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78 (1981) 3721-3725