Application of the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics

Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 163-187

  Schlosser, Ralf W ^a   Lee, David L ^b   Wendt, Oliver ^c  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mata analysis; Percentage of non overlapping data; Reporting characteristics; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DATA EXTRACTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERVENTION STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH SUBJECT; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 56549102209     PISSN: 17489539     EISSN: 17489547     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17489530802505412     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Algozzine, B, Browder, D., Karvonen, M., Test, DW and Wood, WM (2001) Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, pp. 219-277.
2. Barlow, DH, Nock, MK and Hersen, M. (2009) Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change, Pearson Education, Inc, Boston, MA
3. Barrios, BA and Hartmann, DP (1988) Recent developments in single-subject methodology: Methods for analyzing generalization, maintenance, and multicomponent treatments. Progress in behavior modification, 22, pp. 11-47. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi
4. Bellini, S and Akullian, J. (2007) A meta-analysis of video-modeling and self video-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73, pp. 264-287.
5. Bellini, S, Peters, JK, Benner, L. and Hopf, A. (2007) A meta-analysis of school-based interventions for child with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28, pp. 153-162.
6. Beretvas, SN and Chung, H. (2008) A review of single-subject experimental design meta-analyses: Methodological issues and practice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2:3
7. Beretvas, SN and Chung, H. (2008) An evaluation of modified change-in-R2 effect sizes for single-subject experimental designs. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2:3
8. Bonner, M. and Barnett, DW (2004) Intervention-based school psychology services: Training for child-level accountability; preparing for program-level accountability. Journal of School Psychology, 42, pp. 23-43.
9. Browder, DM, Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A. and Wakeman, S. (2008) A meta-analysis of teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, pp. 407-432.
10. Browder, DM, Wakeman, SY, Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. and Algozzine, B. (2006) Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, pp. 392-408.
11. Browder, DM and Xin, YP (2007) A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32, pp. 130-153.
12. Burns, MK and Wagner, D. (2008) Determining an effective intervention within a brief experimental analysis for reading: A meta-analytic review. School Psychology Review, 37, pp. 126-137.
13. Campbell, JM (2003) Efficacy of behavioral interventions for reducing problem behavior in persons with autism: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, pp. 120-138.
14. Campbell, JM (2004) Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single-subject designs. Behavior Modification, 28, pp. 234-246.
15. Center, BA, Skiba, RJ and Casey, A. (1985) A methodology for the quantitative synthesis of intra-subject design research. Journal of Special Education, 19, pp. 387-400.
16. Chen, C-W and Ma, H-H (2007) Effects of treatment on disruptive behaviors: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches using the PEM approach. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8, pp. 380-397.
17. Cirrin, FM and Gillam, RB (2008) Language intervention practices for school-age children with spoken language disorders: A systematic review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 39, pp. 110-137.
18. Didden, R, Duker, PC and Korzilius, H. (1997) Meta-analytic study on treatment effectiveness for problem behaviors with individuals who have mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, pp. 387-399.
19. Didden, R, Korzilius, H., van Oorsouw, W. and Sturmey, P. (2006) Behavioral treatment of challenging behaviors in individuals with mild mental retardation: Meta-Analysis of single-subject research. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, pp. 290-298.
20. Erion, J (2006) Parent tutoring: A meta-analysis. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, pp. 79-106.
21. Faith, MS, Allison, DB and Gorman, BS (1996) Meta-analysis of single-case research. Design and analysis of single-case research, pp. 245-277. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ
22. Gao, Y-J and Ma, H-H (2006) Effectiveness of interventions influencing academic behaviors: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches using the PEM Approach. The Behavior Analysts Today, 4, pp. 572-595.
23. Gast, DL and Wolery, M. (1988) Parallel treatments design: A nested single subject design for comparing instructional procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, pp. 270-285.
24. Glass, GV (1976) Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, pp. 3-8.
25. Graham, S (2006) Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. Handbook of writing research, pp. 187-207. The Guilford Press, New York
26. Graham, S and Harris, KR (2003) Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. Handbook of learning disabilities, pp. 323-344. Guilford Press, New York
27. Gresham, FM, McIntyre, LL, Olson-Tinker, H., Dolstra, L., McLaughlin, V. and Van, M. (2004) Relevance of functional behavioral assessment research for school-based interventions and positive behavioral support. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, pp. 19-37.
28. Herzinger, CV and Campbell, JM (2007) Comparing functional assessment methodologies: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, pp. 1430-1445.
29. Horner, RH and Baer, DM (1978) Multiple probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, pp. 189-196.
30. Horner, RH, Carr, EG, Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, SL and Wolery, M. (2005) The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, pp. 165-179.
31. Hughes, CA, Therrien, WJ and Lee, DL (2004) Efficacy of behavioral self-management techniques with adolescents with learning disabilities and behavior disorders. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 17, pp. 1-28.
32. Joseph, LM and Konrad, M. Teaching students with intellectual or developmental disabilities to write: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities
33. Kazdin, AE (1982) Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
34. Kazdin, AE and Hartmann, DP (1978) The simultaneous-treatment design. Behavior Therapy, 9, pp. 912-922.
35. Kennedy, CH (2005) Single-case designs for educational research, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA
36. Lee, DL (2005) Increasing compliance: A quantitative synthesis of applied research on high-probability request sequences. Exceptionality, 13, pp. 141-154.
37. Lee, S-H, Simpson, RL and Shogren, KA (2007) Effects and implications of self-management for students with autism: A meta-analysis. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, pp. 2-13.
38. Lovelace, S. and Stewart, SR (2007) Increasing print awareness in preschoolers with language impairment using non-evocative print referencing. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 38, pp. 16-30.
39. Mastropieri, MA and Scruggs, TE (1985) Early intervention for socially withdrawn children. Journal of Special Education, 19, pp. 429-441.
40. Mastropieri, MA, Scruggs, TE, Bakken, JP and Whedon, C. (1996) Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 10, pp. 277-303.
41. Mathur, SR, Kavale, KA, Quinn, MM, Forness, SR and Rutherford, RB (1998) Social skills interventions with students with emotional and behavioral problems: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 23, pp. 193-201.
42. Millar, D, Light, JC and Schlosser, RW (2006) The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, pp. 248-264.
43. Moher, D., Tetzlaff, J., Tricco, AC, Sampson, M. and Altman, DG (2007) Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 4:3, p. e78.
44. Olive, ML and Smith, BW (2005) Effect size calculations and single subject designs. Educational Psychology, 25, pp. 313-324.
45. Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. (2006) Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA
46. Reynhout, G and Carter, M. (2006) Social stories for children with disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, pp. 445-469.
47. Rogers, L. and Graham, S. A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology
48. Rusch, RR and Kazdin, AE (1981) Toward a methodology of withdrawal designs for the assessment of response maintenance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, pp. 131-140.
49. Schlosser, RW (1999) Comparative efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, pp. 56-68.
50. Schlosser, RW, Belfiore, PJ, Nigam, R., Blischak, D. and Hetzroni, O. (1995) The effects of speech output technology in the learning of graphic symbols. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, pp. 537-549.
51. Schlosser, RW and Braun, U. (1994) Efficacy of AAC interventions: Methodologic issues in evaluating behavior change, generalization, and effects. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, pp. 207-223.
52. Schlosser, RW and Goetze, H. (1991) Selbstverletzendes Verhalten bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Geistiger Behinderung: Eine Meta-Analyse zur Effektivitat von Interventionen. Sonderpadagogik, 21, pp. 138-154.
53. Schlosser, RW and Goetze, H. (1992) Effectiveness and treatment validity of interventions addressing self-injurious behavior: From narrative reviews to meta-analysis. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 7, pp. 135-175.
54. Schlosser, RW and Lee, D. (2000) Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, pp. 208-227.
55. Schlosser, RW, Lee, D. and Wendt, O. (2008) Systematic review on PND reporting coding form, Unpublished manuscript, Northeastern University, Boston, MA
56. Schlosser, RW and Wendt, O. (2008) Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, pp. 212-230.
57. Schlosser, RW and Wendt, O. (2008) Augmentative and alternative communication interventions for children with autism. Effective Practices for Children with Autism: Educational and Behavior Support Interventions that Work, pp. 325-389. Oxford University Press, New York
58. Schlosser, RW, Wendt, O. and Sigafoos, J. (2007) Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, pp. 138-150.
59. Schwartz, JB and Nye, C. (2006) A systematic review, synthesis, and evaluation of the evidence for teaching sign language to children with autism. EBP Briefs, 1, pp. 1-17.
60. Scotti, JR, Evans, IM, Meyer, LH and Walker, P. (1991) A meta-analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: Treatment validity and standards of practice. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, pp. 233-256.
61. Scruggs, TE and Mastropieri, MA (1994) The effectiveness of generalization training: A quantitative synthesis of single subject research. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 8, pp. 259-280.
62. Scruggs, TE and Mastropieri, MA (2001) How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality, 9, pp. 227-244.
63. Scruggs, TE, Mastropieri, MA and Casto, G. (1987) The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, pp. 24-33.
64. Scruggs, TE, Mastropieri, MA, Cook, SB and Escobar, C. (1986) Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11, pp. 260-271.
65. Scruggs, TE, Mastropieri, MA, Forness, SR and Kavale, KA (1988) Early language intervention: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Journal of Special Education, 22, pp. 259-283.
66. Scruggs, TE, Mastropieri, MA and McEwen, I. (1988) Early intervention for developmental functioning: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, pp. 359-367.
67. Severtson, JM, Carr, JE and Lepper, TL (2008) Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities
68. Shogren, KA, Faggella-Luby, MN, Bae, SJ and Wehmeyer, ML (2004) The effect of choice-making as an intervention for problem behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 6, pp. 228-237.
69. Soto, G, Toro-Zambrana, W. and Belfiore, PJ (1994) Comparison of two instructional strategies on social skills acquisition and generalization among individuals with moderate and severe mental retardation working in a vocational setting: A meta-analytical review. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29, pp. 307-320.
70. Wehmeyer, M (1995) Intra-individual factors influencing efficacy of interventions for stereotyped behaviours: A meta-analysis. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 39, pp. 205-214.
71. Wehmeyer, ML, Palmer, SB, Smith, SJ, Parent, W., Davies, DK and Stock, S. (2006) Technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to support employment activities: A single-subject design meta analysis. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 24, pp. 81-86.
72. Wendt, O. (2008) A statistical comparison of five non-regression effect size metrics for single-subject experimental designs: Preliminary results and future research directions. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2:3
73. Xin, YP, Grasso, E., Dipipi-Hoy, CM and Jitendra, A. (2005) The effects of purchasing skill instruction for individuals with developmental disabilities: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 71, pp. 379-400.
74. Xin, YP and Jitendra, AK (1999) The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education, 32, pp. 207-225.