An evaluation of modified R2-change effect size indices for single-subject experimental designs

Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 120-128

  Beretvas, S Natasha ^a   Chung, Hyewon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Effect sizes; Meta analysis; Multiple regression; Single subject experimental designs

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; INTERVENTION STUDY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 56549131092     PISSN: 17489539     EISSN: 17489547     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17489530802446328     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Beretvas, SN, Chung, H., Machalicek, WA and Riviello, C. (2008) Computation of regression-based effect size measures. Paper presented at the 8th Annual International Campbell Collaboration Colloquium in Vancouver, Canada
2. Busk, PL and Marascuilo, LA (1988) Autocorrelation in single-subject research: A counterargument to the myth of no autocorrelation. Behavioral Assessment, 10, pp. 229-242.
3. Center, BA, Skiba, RJ and Casey, A. (1985) A methodology for the quantitative synthesis of intra-subject design research. Journal of Special Education, 19, pp. 387-400.
4. Cooper, H. and Hedges, LV (1994) The handbook of research synthesis, Russell Sage Foundation, New York
5. Crosbie, J. (1995) Interrupted time-series analysis with short series: Why it is problematic; how it can be improved. The analysis of change, pp. 361-395. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
6. Faith, MS, Allison, DB and Gorman, BS (1996) Meta-analysis of single-case research. Design and analysis of single-case research, pp. 245-277. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
7. Gorsuch, RL (1983) Three methods for analyzing limited time-series (n of 1) data. Behavioral Assessment, 5, pp. 141-154.
8. Hedges, LV and Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis, Academic Press, New York
9. Huitema, BE (1985) Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. Behavioral Analysis, 7, pp. 107-110.
10. Huitema, BE and McKean, JW (1998) Irrelevant autocorrelation in least-squares intervention models. Psychological Methods, 3, pp. 104-116.
11. Huitema, BE and McKean, JW (2000) A simple and powerful test for autocorrelated errors in OLS intervention models. Psychological Reports, 87, pp. 3-20.
12. Huitema, BE and McKean, JW (2000) Design specification issues in time-series intervention models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, pp. 38-58.
13. Jones, RR, Weinrott, M. and Vaught, RS (1978) Effects of serial dependency on the agreement between visual and statistical inference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, pp. 277-283.
14. Kazdin, AE (1982) Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings, Oxford University Press, New York
15. Pankratz, A. (1983) Forecasting with univariate Box-Jenkins models: Concepts and cases, Wiley, New York
16. Riviello, C. and Beretvas, SN (2008) Detecting lag-one autocorrelation in interrupted time series designs with small sample sizes. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
17. Tryon, WW (1982) A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, pp. 423-429.
18. van den Noortgate, W and Onghena, P. (2003) Hierarchical linear models for the quantitative integration of effect sizes in single-case research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, pp. 1-10.